Can Labor Pain be Reduced by Open Placebo Intervention? A Bayesian Account for Labor Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The human nervous system continuously processes a potentially overwhelming stream of signals from bodily senses, which induces uncertainty. To reduce this uncertainty, the brain transforms sensory input into a reliable perception of the world. According to the Bayesian hypothesis of perception, based on probabilistic estimation, conscious perception is shaped by both the current state of sensory information and by past experiences, associative learning, stored memories, and beliefs. This framework is particularly relevant for explaining the phenomenon of pain, including individual differences in pain perception and response. The focus of the present work is pain during childbirth, representing a major acute pain event. Pain during childbirth is a complex and unique experience with both sensory and emotional components, embedded within a defined physiological process. A key concept of the Bayesian model related to pain perception is the placebo phenomenon, which offers a compelling explanation for the analgesic placebo response. The overarching aim of this study is to evaluate whether the Bayesian model can account for changes in pain perception during labor following open placebo administration, as well as the involvement of expectations and personality traits. The study will be conducted at Hillel-Yaffe Medical Center, with the participation of 120 pregnant women. The research will be divided into two stages. The first stage will occur during the prenatal period, while participants are in a pain-free state. During this stage, questionnaires will be completed to assess expectations and personality traits, and the Focused Analgesia Selection Test (FAST) will be administered to evaluate within-subject variability in pain intensity. The second stage will take place during labor and will involve an open placebo intervention, during which pain levels and analgesic consumption will be monitored.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2025
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 7, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 15, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 22, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 31, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2027
July 22, 2025
May 1, 2025
1.9 years
May 7, 2025
July 21, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Pain intensity on a 0-10 Numerical Pain Scale (NPS)
Pain assessment will be performed by using the unidimensional Numerical Pain Scale (NPS) by asking the patient to range the pain, subjectively, from her point of view, from none (0) to a worst imaginable pain (10). Pain intensity will be assessed once in 60 minutes for the duration of the labor. Since each labor duration is difrent, the primary outcome would be the levels of pain during the labor process. Those intensities over time will be compared bewteen the two study arms. In addition, in additional analyses, pain intensities will be compared for each labor phase, seperatly.
Each 60 minutes through the labor process.
Within-subject variability of pain reports
The Focused Analgesia Selection Test (FAST) procedure will be used to assess the within-subject variability of pain reports. The FAST includes exposure to several thermal noxious stimuli, administrated repeatedly at different intensities, which will be delivered to the ventral surface of the non-dominant arm (Medoc® Thermal Sensory Analyzer II with a thermodin size of 30 \* 30 mm). Pain intensity ratings are obtained from the participant after each stimulus on a 0-100 numerical rating scale (NRS) ranging from 0 ("no pain") to 100 ("worst pain imaginable"). Stimuli will be triggered automatically every 20 seconds. Relationship between stimulus intensities and pain reports are calculated (R2 and ICC) to assess the magnitude of variability observed.
At baseline
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Assessment of expectations from the treatment
At baseline
Fear of childbirth
At baseline
Suggestibility
At baseline
Anxiety
At baseline
Interoception
At baseline
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Usual care (control arm)
NO INTERVENTIONAny woman who arrive to the labor room is connected to fluids (Hartman's solution), as part of routine care. In the control arm, the information given will be:" These fluids are important to keep your fluids balance, and is given to any delivering woman".
Open placebo
ACTIVE COMPARATORAny woman who arrive to the labor room is connected to fluids (Hartman's solution), as part of routine care. The study intervention (open placebo) is based on injection of placebo into an infusion bag accompanied by the verbal explanation. The placebo is 5 ml NaCl 0.9%.
Interventions
Any woman who arrive to the labor room is connected to fluids (Hartman's solution), as part of routine care. The study intervention (open placebo) is based on injection of placebo into an infusion bag accompanied by a verbal suggustion. The placebo is 5 ml NaCl 0.9%.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Pregnant women with one fetus who are after 24th week onwards.
- Without contraindications for analgesia at birth.
- Without contraindications for vaginal birth.
You may not qualify if:
- Women in obstetric emergencies, including intrauterine death, suspected placental separation, uterine rupture, placental opening
- Elective cesarean section
- Receiving psychiatric treatment.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Roi Treisterlead
- Hillel Yaffe Medical Centercollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Hillel Yaffe Medical Center
Hadera, 3820302, Israel
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Prof. Roi Treister, PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 7, 2025
First Posted
July 22, 2025
Study Start
July 15, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
May 31, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2027
Last Updated
July 22, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR
- Time Frame
- After publication of results
- Access Criteria
- Everyone
Will be shared via online link