NCT07077343

Brief Summary

The effectiveness of traditional craniotomy in the treatment of intracerebral hemorrhage remains controversial. Minimally invasive surgery, specially, image-guided hematoma aspiration, proves to be effective and may have some advantages compared with craniotomy. This multicenter randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate and compare the clinical efficacy of two minimally invasive treatment strategies for patients with spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) with moderate hematoma volume (20-50 mL): (1) AI-assisted, navigation-guided hematoma aspiration, and (2) targeted pharmacological therapy. This study is designed to address the current lack of prospective comparative evidence between advanced image-guided surgical intervention and medical management in this specific patient population. By focusing on functional recovery, hematoma resolution, and safety outcomes, this trial seeks to provide high-quality evidence to guide treatment decision-making and optimize individualized care for patients with spontaneous ICH.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
680

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
61mo left

Started Jul 2025

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress16%
Jul 2025Jun 2031

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 18, 2020

Completed
5.3 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2025

Completed
21 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 22, 2025

Completed
5.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2030

Expected
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 30, 2031

Last Updated

April 27, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

5.5 years

First QC Date

March 18, 2020

Last Update Submit

April 22, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

intracerebral hemorrhagenavigated hematoma aspirationconservative treatmentmodified rankin scaleartificial intellegience

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • modified Rankin Scale

    The degree of disability or dependence in the daily activities. The scale runs from 0-6, running from perfect health without symptoms to death.

    6 months

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Postoperative Glasgow Coma Scale

    7 days

  • Days of ICU Stay

    14 days

  • Mortality

    30 days

  • WHO Quality of Life

    6 months

  • Medical expenses and health economic burden

    up to 6 months

Study Arms (2)

AI-Assisted Navigated Hematoma Aspiration

EXPERIMENTAL

This technique integrates AI-driven imaging analysis with navigation systems to enable accurate targeting and aspiration of intracerebral hematomas through a burr-hole approach, reducing surgical trauma and improving functional outcomes.

Procedure: AI-Assisted Navigated Hematoma Aspiration

Conservative Treatment

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Conservative treatment for intracerebral hemorrhage involves medical management without surgical intervention, focusing on stabilizing the patient, controlling blood pressure, managing intracranial pressure, and preventing secondary complications.

Procedure: Conservative Treatment

Interventions

By leveraging AI algorithms for real-time hematoma segmentation, volume calculation, and trajectory optimization, this approach enhances the accuracy of minimally invasive catheter placement and facilitates efficient clot removal under image-guided navigation.

AI-Assisted Navigated Hematoma Aspiration

Compared to surgical hematoma aspiration, conservative treatment relies on medical stabilization and the body's natural clearance mechanisms, and remains the standard of care in many cases of moderate or deep-seated ICH without signs of clinical deterioration.

Conservative Treatment

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Confirmed supratentorial hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage on brain CT scan
  • Hematoma volume 20-50mL
  • Patients with with GCS score ≥8
  • Admitted within 24h of ictus

You may not qualify if:

  • Intracerebral hemorrhage caused by tumor, coagulopathy, aneurysm, or arteriovenous malformation
  • Concurrent head injury or history of head injury
  • Multiple intracerebral hemorrhage
  • Known advanced demential or disability before
  • Severe concomitant diseases that affect life expectancy
  • With severe intraventricular hemorrhage
  • Pregnant women

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Chinese PLA General Hospital

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100853, China

RECRUITING

Related Publications (1)

  • Xu X, Zhang J, Yuan Q, Lang S, Gan Z, Jin H, Chen X. AI-driven navigated hematoma aspiration vs. conservative treatment for spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2026 Apr 23. doi: 10.1186/s13063-026-09738-9. Online ahead of print.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Cerebral Hemorrhage

Interventions

Conservative Treatment

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Intracranial HemorrhagesCerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesHemorrhagePathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Therapeutics

Study Officials

  • Xiaolei Chen, MD

    Chinese PLA General Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Xinghua Xu, MD

CONTACT

Qun Wang, MD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Patients' personal data are made anonymous and numbered by the system. A list of patient names and study numbers is kept in a separate file to ensure that patients' confidentiality is maintained.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 18, 2020

First Posted

July 22, 2025

Study Start

July 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2030

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2031

Last Updated

April 27, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04

Locations