Determination of the Effectiveness of Two Different Noninvasive Stimulation Methods in Urine Collection in Infants
1 other identifier
interventional
72
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will be conducted to determine the effects of bladder stimulation and subrapubic cutaneous stimulation techniques applied during urine sampling in infants on the success of urine sampling, pain and procedure time.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 11, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 15, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 20, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 15, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 15, 2025
CompletedNovember 20, 2025
November 1, 2025
2 months
July 11, 2025
November 19, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Procedural pain score- FLACC Pain Scale
The Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) scale consists of five categories (face, legs, activity, crying, and consolability), and each category is scored between 0 and 2 depending on the pain or distress behaviors observed. The total score ranges from 0 to 10, with 0 indicating no pain or distress and 10 indicating extreme pain or distress. The FLACC scale was developed to assess pain in children aged 2 months to 7 years and is one of the widely recommended scales for assessing pain and distress among pediatric patients.
At the beginning of the procedure, at the end of the procedure
Urine sample collection success
Infants who can have a urine sample collected during the procedure will be recorded as having a successful procedure.
During the procedure (Average 5 minutes)
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Procedure time
Through the procedure completion, an average of 5 minutes.
Study Arms (3)
Control Group
NO INTERVENTIONUrine samples from infants in the control group will be collected according to the clinic's routine practice. Unlike routine practice, these infants will be positioned to ensure similarity to the experimental groups. Urine samples will be collected in an upright position, held under the arms. No noninvasive stimulation will be used.
Bladder stimulation
EXPERIMENTALThese babies will be held in an upright position by holding them under their arms during the urine sample collection process. A bladder stimulation technique will be used during the procedure.
Subrapubic cutaneous stimulation
EXPERIMENTALThese babies will be held in an upright position by holding them under their arms during the urine sample collection process. A subrapubic cutaneous stimulation technique will be used during the procedure.
Interventions
This stimulation consists of two stages. In the first maneuver, the bladder is stimulated by gentle tapping of the suprapubic area for 30 seconds. In the second maneuver, the paravertebral area is massaged in a circular motion for 30 seconds. The two stimulation maneuvers are repeated sequentially for 5 minutes.
Circular rubbing movements will be made on the baby's suprapubic area with gauze soaked in cold salt water until micturition begins.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- A urine sample must be collected due to suspicion of a urinary tract infection,
- The infant must be being fed orally,
- The skin in the area where the maneuver will be performed must be intact,
- The infant must be conscious and have stable vital signs.
- The infant must be from families that can speak and understand Turkish and are willing to participate in the study
You may not qualify if:
- Presence of respiratory distress and signs of dehydration,
- Presence of a diagnosed chronic health problem,
- Presence of a neurological or anatomical abnormality that may affect bladder function,
- Presence of any diagnostic suspicion (distension, intussusception, appendicitis, etc.) that would preclude the application of the stimulation maneuver,
- Presence of cold stress.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Istanbul Medeniyet University
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (2)
Marchal S, Janicot J, Salicis J, Demonchy D, Herisse AL, Olla M, Rancurel A, Haas H, Berard E, Breaud J, Bernardor J, Ribet C, Freyssinet E, Donzeau D, Desmontils J, Schori-Fortier C, Fontas E, Tran A. Quick-Wee versus bladder stimulation to collect midstream urine from precontinent infants under 1 year of age: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (ES.Stimquick.U). BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 16;11(9):e046324. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046324.
PMID: 34531206BACKGROUNDKorkmaz N, Narter FK, Mutlu B, Sahin K, Ozgoru H. Effects of the bladder stimulation technique on urine sample collection in newborns: A randomized controlled study. Int J Nurs Pract. 2024 Oct;30(5):e13255. doi: 10.1111/ijn.13255. Epub 2024 Apr 15.
PMID: 38622105BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Aynur Aytekin Ozdemir, Professor
İstanbul Medeniyet University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Using the block randomization technique, participants will be divided into 3 groups. A web-based randomization list creation tool will be used to create the blocked randomization list. Control and intervention groups will be coded as A, B and C using the sealed envelope method. Randomization information will be kept from the researcher involved in data collection until data collection begins. The researcher will learn which group each child is in just before the application (researcher blinding).Research data will be entered into the computer database by coding the group name as A, B and C, and statistical analysis will be performed using this coding (statistician blinding).
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 11, 2025
First Posted
July 20, 2025
Study Start
July 15, 2025
Primary Completion
September 15, 2025
Study Completion
September 15, 2025
Last Updated
November 20, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
- Time Frame
- January through March of 2027
- Access Criteria
- Individual participant data may be shared upon request from the principal investigator, subject to the appropriateness of the request, while ensuring adherence to the rules of confidentiality regarding individual data.
Individual participant data may be shared upon request from the principal investigator, subject to the appropriateness of the request, while ensuring adherence to the rules of confidentiality regarding individual data.