NCT07075094

Brief Summary

This study will be conducted to determine the effects of bladder stimulation and subrapubic cutaneous stimulation techniques applied during urine sampling in infants on the success of urine sampling, pain and procedure time.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
72

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2025

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 11, 2025

Completed
4 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 15, 2025

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 20, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 15, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 15, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

November 20, 2025

Status Verified

November 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

July 11, 2025

Last Update Submit

November 19, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

InfantUrine collectionNoninvasive stimulation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Procedural pain score- FLACC Pain Scale

    The Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) scale consists of five categories (face, legs, activity, crying, and consolability), and each category is scored between 0 and 2 depending on the pain or distress behaviors observed. The total score ranges from 0 to 10, with 0 indicating no pain or distress and 10 indicating extreme pain or distress. The FLACC scale was developed to assess pain in children aged 2 months to 7 years and is one of the widely recommended scales for assessing pain and distress among pediatric patients.

    At the beginning of the procedure, at the end of the procedure

  • Urine sample collection success

    Infants who can have a urine sample collected during the procedure will be recorded as having a successful procedure.

    During the procedure (Average 5 minutes)

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Procedure time

    Through the procedure completion, an average of 5 minutes.

Study Arms (3)

Control Group

NO INTERVENTION

Urine samples from infants in the control group will be collected according to the clinic's routine practice. Unlike routine practice, these infants will be positioned to ensure similarity to the experimental groups. Urine samples will be collected in an upright position, held under the arms. No noninvasive stimulation will be used.

Bladder stimulation

EXPERIMENTAL

These babies will be held in an upright position by holding them under their arms during the urine sample collection process. A bladder stimulation technique will be used during the procedure.

Procedure: Bladder stimulation

Subrapubic cutaneous stimulation

EXPERIMENTAL

These babies will be held in an upright position by holding them under their arms during the urine sample collection process. A subrapubic cutaneous stimulation technique will be used during the procedure.

Procedure: Subrapubic cutaneous stimulation

Interventions

This stimulation consists of two stages. In the first maneuver, the bladder is stimulated by gentle tapping of the suprapubic area for 30 seconds. In the second maneuver, the paravertebral area is massaged in a circular motion for 30 seconds. The two stimulation maneuvers are repeated sequentially for 5 minutes.

Bladder stimulation

Circular rubbing movements will be made on the baby's suprapubic area with gauze soaked in cold salt water until micturition begins.

Subrapubic cutaneous stimulation

Eligibility Criteria

Age1 Month - 6 Months
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • A urine sample must be collected due to suspicion of a urinary tract infection,
  • The infant must be being fed orally,
  • The skin in the area where the maneuver will be performed must be intact,
  • The infant must be conscious and have stable vital signs.
  • The infant must be from families that can speak and understand Turkish and are willing to participate in the study

You may not qualify if:

  • Presence of respiratory distress and signs of dehydration,
  • Presence of a diagnosed chronic health problem,
  • Presence of a neurological or anatomical abnormality that may affect bladder function,
  • Presence of any diagnostic suspicion (distension, intussusception, appendicitis, etc.) that would preclude the application of the stimulation maneuver,
  • Presence of cold stress.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Istanbul Medeniyet University

Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Marchal S, Janicot J, Salicis J, Demonchy D, Herisse AL, Olla M, Rancurel A, Haas H, Berard E, Breaud J, Bernardor J, Ribet C, Freyssinet E, Donzeau D, Desmontils J, Schori-Fortier C, Fontas E, Tran A. Quick-Wee versus bladder stimulation to collect midstream urine from precontinent infants under 1 year of age: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (ES.Stimquick.U). BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 16;11(9):e046324. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046324.

    PMID: 34531206BACKGROUND
  • Korkmaz N, Narter FK, Mutlu B, Sahin K, Ozgoru H. Effects of the bladder stimulation technique on urine sample collection in newborns: A randomized controlled study. Int J Nurs Pract. 2024 Oct;30(5):e13255. doi: 10.1111/ijn.13255. Epub 2024 Apr 15.

    PMID: 38622105BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Aynur Aytekin Ozdemir, Professor

    İstanbul Medeniyet University

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Using the block randomization technique, participants will be divided into 3 groups. A web-based randomization list creation tool will be used to create the blocked randomization list. Control and intervention groups will be coded as A, B and C using the sealed envelope method. Randomization information will be kept from the researcher involved in data collection until data collection begins. The researcher will learn which group each child is in just before the application (researcher blinding).Research data will be entered into the computer database by coding the group name as A, B and C, and statistical analysis will be performed using this coding (statistician blinding).
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Participants will be assigned to experimental and control groups using block randomization method. Age and sex variables will be used for block randomization. In order to reach the sample size calculated in the study, strata will be repeated two times (2X2X6) and 24 infant will be included in each group.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 11, 2025

First Posted

July 20, 2025

Study Start

July 15, 2025

Primary Completion

September 15, 2025

Study Completion

September 15, 2025

Last Updated

November 20, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Individual participant data may be shared upon request from the principal investigator, subject to the appropriateness of the request, while ensuring adherence to the rules of confidentiality regarding individual data.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL
Time Frame
January through March of 2027
Access Criteria
Individual participant data may be shared upon request from the principal investigator, subject to the appropriateness of the request, while ensuring adherence to the rules of confidentiality regarding individual data.

Locations