RCT on the Efficacy and Safety of Minimally Invasive SAIF Technique vs Spinal Fixation in Unstable Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures
SAIF
A Multicenter Prospective Randomized Controlled Non-Inferiority Trial Comparing Minimally Invasive SAIF Vertebral Reconstruction Technique Versus Spinal Fixation in Unstable Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures
1 other identifier
interventional
140
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVF) represent a significant cause of morbidity, mortality, decreased level of function and quality of life. The most severe OVFs are unstable and in these cases surgical stabilization, with various techniques, is considered necessary to restore the physiological loading capacity of the spine, and allow fast and painless mobilization. Unfortunately, the elderly, osteoporotic patient population poses serious challenges to spinal surgery, due to tissue frailty and frequent comorbidities. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the SAIF intervention in comparison with multilevel surgical stabilization in participants with unstable OVFs.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2027
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 30, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 17, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2027
ExpectedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2029
Study Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2030
April 22, 2026
April 1, 2026
3 years
April 30, 2025
April 17, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in the Quality of Life questionnaire of the European Foundation of Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO) score.
The QUALEFFO score is patient-reported and comprises 41 items on five domains: pain, physical function, social function, general health perception, and mental function. All answers are standardized so that 1 represents the best and 5 (or 3, or 4) represents the worst quality of life. The total score is calculated by summing all answers of questions 1-41. The raw total score ranges from 41 to 205 and this is transformed to scores from 0 to 100. A high score indicates a poor quality of life.
at 12 months from baseline.
Secondary Outcomes (11)
restoration of angular kyphosis at index level
pre-operative and at 1, 6 and 12 months follow up
vertebral body height restoration
Baseline and 1 day after the intervention
global kyphosis/lordosis
pre-operative and at 1, 6 and 12 months follow up
Global Sagittal Balance
pre-operative and at 1, 6 and 12 months follow up
length of operation
Perioperative
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (1)
Safety outcomes
up to 12 months.
Study Arms (2)
Stent-screw Assisted Internal Fixation (SAIF)
EXPERIMENTALSAIF technique, performed by percutaneous access, consists of, implanting vertebral body stents (VBS) under fluoroscopic guidance, followed by insertion of percutaneous, fenestrated, cement-augmented pedicular screws that act as anchors to the posterior elements for the cement/stent complex. The screws reduce the risk of stent mobilization in a non-intact vertebral body (VB) cortical shell and bridge middle column and pedicular fractures.
Surgical stabilization
ACTIVE COMPARATORSpinal stabilization with augmented or non-augmented pedicle screws bridging the fractured vertebra, with or without (percutaneous) cement augmentation of the fractured vertebra, with or without reconstruction of the anterior column via anterior or lateral approach.
Interventions
Implanting vertebral body stents (VBS), followed by insertion of percutaneous, fenestrated, cement-augmented pedicular screws
Spinal fixation with cement augmented pedicle screws bridging the fractured vertebra
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- one to two unstable OVFs\* type OF 3-5\*\* as assessed on CT scan, located between T2 and L5, of age \<3 months or with persistent edema on STIR, or with pseudarthrosis, at the index level
- patients reporting pain upon mobilization
- a diagnosis of osteoporosis, based on a DEXA T-score ≤ -2.5, or on a spontaneous thoracolumbar vertebral fracture or a vertebral fracture caused by minor trauma
- able to read and speak the official language of the region of the site,
- informed consent
- additional OVF without unstable features (OF 1-2) allowed \*\* OF-Classification
You may not qualify if:
- compressive neurologic symptoms such as myelopathy or radiculopathy with motor deficit
- acute infection
- spinal malignancy
- comorbid severe psychiatric conditions
- known or suspected non-compliance, drug or alcohol abuse
- known hypersensitivity or allergy to the investigational product
- inability to follow the procedures of the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
EOC Lugano
Lugano, Canton Ticino, 6900, Switzerland
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD PhD LLM
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 30, 2025
First Posted
July 17, 2025
Study Start (Estimated)
January 1, 2027
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2029
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2030
Last Updated
April 22, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
- Time Frame
- Beginning 6 months following publication and available for up to 5 years.
- Access Criteria
- Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal. Proposals should be directed to the corresponding author. Data will be shared after approval and signing of a data access agreement.
De-identified individual participant data, including baseline characteristics, imaging data and clinical outcomes, will be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author following publication. Data will be shared with researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal, subject to approval and after signing a data access agreement