Adaptation of a Values Assessment Tool
Values Assessment Tailored for Women With Metastatic Breast Cancer and Their Caregivers: Adaptation and Pilot Study of a Values Assessment Tool (VAsT)
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of values assessment tool on patient and caregiver perception of decisional conflict, and communication with their oncology clinician.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable cancer
Started Jan 2023
Typical duration for not_applicable cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 5, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 26, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 16, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 24, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 24, 2026
October 10, 2025
October 1, 2025
3.6 years
June 26, 2025
October 9, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Decisional engagement
Values Assessment Tool participants will be assessed using decisional engagement, Patient-Centered Communication in Cancer Care (PCC-Ca) 36. Each item included in the PCC-Ca instrument consists of a question stem and five response options. The response options are scored from 1 to 5, with higher scores representing better communication; for example, where 1 = Never and 5 = Always. There are no reverse-scored items. Some items have a sixth "does not apply" option. This response is not scored.
Baseline and every clinic visit for 3 months
Decisional conflict
Decisional Conflict will be assessed using the Decisional Conflict Scale (10-item low literacy version). Scoring and Interpretation: Items are given a score value of: 0 = 'yes'; 2 = 'unsure'; 4 = 'no' Total Score: 10 items \[items 1-10 inclusive\] are: a) summed; b) divided by 10; and c) multiplied by 25. Scores range from 0 \[no decisional conflict\] to 100 \[extremely high decisional conflict\]
Baseline and every clinic visit for 3 months
Communication perceptions
Communication perceptions will be assessed using Patient-Centered Communication in Cancer Care (PCC-Ca) 36. Each item included in the PCC-Ca instrument consists of a question stem and five response options. The response options are scored from 1 to 5, with higher scores representing better communication; for example, where 1 = Never and 5 = Always. There are no reverse-scored items. Some items have a sixth "does not apply" option. This response is not scored.
Baseline and every clinic visit for 3 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
The number of participants who started and completed
Baseline and 3 months
Shared decision making evaluation
Baseline and 3 months
Study Arms (1)
Values assessment tool
EXPERIMENTALParticipants are assessed at baseline and every clinic visit for 3 months
Interventions
The Values Assessment Tool was provided to the participants at baseline and every clinic visit for 3 months
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥18 years
- Diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer.
- Understand and read English.
- Receive care or anticipate receiving care at the North Carolina Cancer Hospital ambulatory cancer clinic or affiliated community cancer clinic.
- Able to understand and participate in study procedures for length of study.
You may not qualify if:
- Unable to provide consent, unable to communicate verbally.
- Unable to understand or read English.
- Enrolled in hospice care.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
UNC Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, United States
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lorinda Coombs, PhD, FNP-BC, AOCNP
UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 26, 2025
First Posted
July 16, 2025
Study Start
January 5, 2023
Primary Completion (Estimated)
August 24, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
August 24, 2026
Last Updated
October 10, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-10