NCT07066774

Brief Summary

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) require accurate biopsy for diagnosis, grading, and management decisions. Although tru-cut biopsy is widely used, the optimal needle gauge remains uncertain. This study aimed to compare diagnostic accuracy and biopsy concordance rates of 14 G, 16 G, and 18 G tru-cut biopsy needles for extremity STS.

  1. 1.Is there any difference between the diagnostic accuracy measurements of 14G, 16G and 18G tru-cut biopsy needles for diagnosis of soft tissue sarcomas in extremities?
  2. 2.Do tumor size, tumor depth, tumor subtype and histological grade of the tumor affect the "matching score"s of biopsies?
  3. 3.Do tumor size, tumor depth, tumor subtype and histological grade of the tumor affect the biopsy result concordance and/or diagnostic accuracy measurements?
  4. 4.Does needle gauge effect successful tumoral tissue sampling or prediction of histological grade of soft tissue sarcomas?

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2025

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 3, 2025

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2025

Completed
17 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 18, 2025

Completed
16 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 4, 2025

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 15, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

July 15, 2025

Status Verified

July 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

July 4, 2025

Last Update Submit

July 4, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

needle size, soft tissue sarcoma, diagnostic accuracy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Diagnostic accuracy methods

    Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, false positive rate and false negative rate was analyzed for 3 different needle sizes

    From enrollment to the end of study at 4 months

Study Arms (3)

14G Needle

EXPERIMENTAL

Each patient undergoes a tru-cut biopsy with a 14 G needle, obtaining 5 tissue cores (tumor center, superior, inferior, medial, lateral).

Diagnostic Test: Tru-cut Biopsy with 14 G Needle

16G Needle

EXPERIMENTAL

Each participant underwent Percutaneous Tru-cut Biopsy with 16G tru-cut needles in a single session procedure and within-subject repeated measuring data is obtained

Diagnostic Test: Tru-cut Biopsy with 16G tru-cut needle

18G Needle

EXPERIMENTAL

Each participant underwent Percutaneous Tru-cut Biopsy with 16G tru-cut needles in a single session procedure and within-subject repeated measuring data is obtained

Diagnostic Test: Tru-cut Biopsy with 18G tru-cut needle

Interventions

Each participant underwent Percutaneous Tru-cut Biopsy with 14G tru-cut needle in a single session procedure. There are no studies to our knowledge to compare samples from the same tumor

14G Needle

Each participant underwent Percutaneous Tru-cut Biopsy with 16 tru-cut needle in a single session procedure. There are no studies to our knowledge to compare samples from the same tumor

16G Needle

Each participant underwent Percutaneous Tru-cut Biopsy with 18G tru-cut needle in a single session procedure. There are no studies to our knowledge to compare samples from the same tumor

18G Needle

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients presenting to the Orthopedic Oncology outpatient clinic at Ankara Bilkent City Hospital with suspected or preliminary findings on physical examination suggesting soft tissue sarcoma.
  • Patients presenting to the Orthopedic Oncology outpatient clinic at Ankara Bilkent City Hospital with suspected or preliminary findings on radiological imaging suggesting soft tissue sarcoma.
  • Patients with soft tissue masses in extremities which require pathological examination

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with a prior diagnosis of the existing mass, coagulation disorders, active infection at the tumor site, a history of previous surgery or radiotherapy to the tumor region, medical conditions contraindicating tru-cut biopsy, or those who did not consent to participate after detailed explanation of the study, were excluded.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Ankara Bilkent City Hospital

Ankara, Cankaya, 06800, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Birgin E, Yang C, Hetjens S, Reissfelder C, Hohenberger P, Rahbari NN. Core needle biopsy versus incisional biopsy for differentiation of soft-tissue sarcomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer. 2020 Jan 1;126(9):1917-1928. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32735. Epub 2020 Feb 5.

    PMID: 32022262BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Sarcoma

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplasms, Connective and Soft TissueNeoplasms by Histologic TypeNeoplasms

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 4, 2025

First Posted

July 15, 2025

Study Start

February 3, 2025

Primary Completion

June 1, 2025

Study Completion

June 18, 2025

Last Updated

July 15, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

IPD will no affect the study results or analysis.

Locations