Biopsy Needle Size in Soft Tissue Sarcoma
Diagnostic Accuracy of Different Tru-Cut Needle Sizes in Soft Tissue Sarcomas: A Prospective Blinded Study
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) require accurate biopsy for diagnosis, grading, and management decisions. Although tru-cut biopsy is widely used, the optimal needle gauge remains uncertain. This study aimed to compare diagnostic accuracy and biopsy concordance rates of 14 G, 16 G, and 18 G tru-cut biopsy needles for extremity STS.
- 1.Is there any difference between the diagnostic accuracy measurements of 14G, 16G and 18G tru-cut biopsy needles for diagnosis of soft tissue sarcomas in extremities?
- 2.Do tumor size, tumor depth, tumor subtype and histological grade of the tumor affect the "matching score"s of biopsies?
- 3.Do tumor size, tumor depth, tumor subtype and histological grade of the tumor affect the biopsy result concordance and/or diagnostic accuracy measurements?
- 4.Does needle gauge effect successful tumoral tissue sampling or prediction of histological grade of soft tissue sarcomas?
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 3, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 18, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 4, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 15, 2025
CompletedJuly 15, 2025
July 1, 2025
4 months
July 4, 2025
July 4, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Diagnostic accuracy methods
Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, false positive rate and false negative rate was analyzed for 3 different needle sizes
From enrollment to the end of study at 4 months
Study Arms (3)
14G Needle
EXPERIMENTALEach patient undergoes a tru-cut biopsy with a 14 G needle, obtaining 5 tissue cores (tumor center, superior, inferior, medial, lateral).
16G Needle
EXPERIMENTALEach participant underwent Percutaneous Tru-cut Biopsy with 16G tru-cut needles in a single session procedure and within-subject repeated measuring data is obtained
18G Needle
EXPERIMENTALEach participant underwent Percutaneous Tru-cut Biopsy with 16G tru-cut needles in a single session procedure and within-subject repeated measuring data is obtained
Interventions
Each participant underwent Percutaneous Tru-cut Biopsy with 14G tru-cut needle in a single session procedure. There are no studies to our knowledge to compare samples from the same tumor
Each participant underwent Percutaneous Tru-cut Biopsy with 16 tru-cut needle in a single session procedure. There are no studies to our knowledge to compare samples from the same tumor
Each participant underwent Percutaneous Tru-cut Biopsy with 18G tru-cut needle in a single session procedure. There are no studies to our knowledge to compare samples from the same tumor
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients presenting to the Orthopedic Oncology outpatient clinic at Ankara Bilkent City Hospital with suspected or preliminary findings on physical examination suggesting soft tissue sarcoma.
- Patients presenting to the Orthopedic Oncology outpatient clinic at Ankara Bilkent City Hospital with suspected or preliminary findings on radiological imaging suggesting soft tissue sarcoma.
- Patients with soft tissue masses in extremities which require pathological examination
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with a prior diagnosis of the existing mass, coagulation disorders, active infection at the tumor site, a history of previous surgery or radiotherapy to the tumor region, medical conditions contraindicating tru-cut biopsy, or those who did not consent to participate after detailed explanation of the study, were excluded.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ankara Bilkent City Hospital
Ankara, Cankaya, 06800, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (1)
Birgin E, Yang C, Hetjens S, Reissfelder C, Hohenberger P, Rahbari NN. Core needle biopsy versus incisional biopsy for differentiation of soft-tissue sarcomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer. 2020 Jan 1;126(9):1917-1928. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32735. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
PMID: 32022262BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 4, 2025
First Posted
July 15, 2025
Study Start
February 3, 2025
Primary Completion
June 1, 2025
Study Completion
June 18, 2025
Last Updated
July 15, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
IPD will no affect the study results or analysis.