Extracorporeal Shock-Wave Therapy (ESWT) vs Phytotherapy vs Combined in Treatment of Chronic Prostatitis
Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Combined Extracorporeal Shock- Wave Therapy (ESWT) With Phytotherapy Versus Each of Them Alone in Chronic Prostatitis Category ⅢB
1 other identifier
interventional
90
1 country
1
Brief Summary
to compare the efficacy and safety of ESWT combined with phytotherapy, ESWT alone and phytotherapy alone in treatment of chronic prostatitis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 28, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 15, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 20, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2026
CompletedJuly 17, 2025
July 1, 2025
7 months
June 28, 2025
July 14, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
compare the degree of symptoms relief between the three groups
using National Institutes of Health-developed Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIHCPSI) that will be filled by the patients pre and post intervention at 4 weeks and 8 weeks, 2 and 4 months. It comprises three key domains: pain (scored from 0 to 21), urinary symptoms (0 to 10), and the impact on quality of life (0 to 12), with a total score range spanning from 0 to 43. Higher scores reflect more severe symptoms and a worse overall outcome, while lower scores indicate milder symptoms and a better clinical picture. Severity is typically interpreted as mild (0-9), moderate (10-18), severe (19-31), and very severe (32-43), making the scale valuable for both diagnosis and monitoring treatment progress.
pre intervenon, at 4 and 8 weeks post intervention and at 2 and 4 months post intervention.
Study Arms (3)
Group A ESWT and Phytotherapy
EXPERIMENTALFirst group will undergo ( ESWT -Transperineal- once a week for 8 consecutive weeks with a protocol of 3000 pulses each; pressure: 1.8-2.0 bar and a frequency of 10 Hertz (Hz) (Zhang et al . 2018) combined with Phytotherapy that contains powder extract of (saw palmetto , tomato , uva ursi , pygeum , pumpkin ) 1capsule twice daily.
Group B: ESWT alone
EXPERIMENTALTransperineal- once a week for 8 consecutive weeks with a protocol of 3000 pulses each; pressure: 1.8-2.0 bar and a frequency of 10 Hertz (Hz)
Group 3: Phytotherapy alone
ACTIVE COMPARATORPhytotherapy that contains powder extract of (saw palmetto , tomato , uva ursi , pygeum , pumpkin ) 1capsule twice daily
Interventions
Transperineal Shockwaves that are applied once a week for 8 consecutive weeks with a protocol of 3000 pulses each; pressure: 1.8-2.0 bar and a frequency of 10 Hertz (Hz)
1capsule tob be taken twice daily for one month.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Perineal or pelvic pain or discomfort of at least 3 months
- NIH-CPSI total score greater than 15,
- Negative semen cultures for bacteria.
You may not qualify if:
- Evidence of bacteria in seminal culture tests,
- Urinary stones,
- Uncontrolled coagulopathy,
- Chronic bacterial prostatitis,
- Bladder and prostate cancer,
- Medications that could affect lower urinary tract function during the last month
- Serum prostate-specific antigen levels (PSA) more than 4 ng/mL
- History of prostate surgery or radiotherapy
- Perineal anatomical abnormalities
- Neurological abnormalities.
- Previous extensive pelvic injuries
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
AinShams University hospitals
Cairo, Egypt
Related Publications (3)
Wagenlehner FM, van Till JW, Magri V, Perletti G, Houbiers JG, Weidner W, Nickel JC. National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI) symptom evaluation in multinational cohorts of patients with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome. Eur Urol. 2013 May;63(5):953-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.10.042. Epub 2012 Nov 2.
PMID: 23141933BACKGROUNDSakr AM, Fawzi AM, Kamel M, Ali MM. Outcomes and clinical predictors of extracorporeal shock wave therapy in the treatment of chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: a prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2022 Mar;25(1):93-99. doi: 10.1038/s41391-021-00464-8. Epub 2021 Oct 11.
PMID: 34635804BACKGROUNDPalmieri A, Cai T, Di Luise L, D'Alterio C, La Cava G, Cirigliano L, Di Giovanni A, Gallelli L, Capece M. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy in association with bromelain and escin for the management of patients affected by chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome. Biomed Rep. 2022 Nov 25;18(1):7. doi: 10.3892/br.2022.1589. eCollection 2023 Jan.
PMID: 36544851BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Mohammed Y. Yassin, Professor
Ain Shams University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Lecturer of Urology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 28, 2025
First Posted
July 15, 2025
Study Start
July 20, 2025
Primary Completion
February 1, 2026
Study Completion
March 1, 2026
Last Updated
July 17, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share