The Effect of Asymmetrical vs. Symmetrical High Flow Nasal Cannula on the Work of Breathing
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this study randomized single-center crossover study is to evaluate the impact of asymmetrical versus symmetrical nasal high flow (NHF) therapy on work of breathing (WOB). The main question it aims to answer are: 1\. Does the asymmetrical NHF interface improve the work of breathing compared to the symmetrical NHF interface? Researchers will compare the symmetrical NHF interface to the symmetrical NHF interface to see if the the asymmetrical interface has a greater impact on the work of breathing. Participants will :
- 1.receive NHF via both interfaces (FiO₂ 0.21, 50 L/min) for 15 minutes, in random order, with esophageal pressure monitoring and bioelectrical impedance analysis performed.
- 2.baseline characteristics will me monitored throughout the interventions
- 3.Esophageal pressure and minute ventilation will be monitored.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 9, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 24, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 15, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2025
CompletedJuly 18, 2025
July 1, 2025
1.4 years
June 24, 2025
July 15, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change in the pressure time product after the use of symmetrical high flow nasal interface for 15 minutes.
This outcome measures the change in the Pressure-Time Product (PTP) before and after the application of a symmetrical high-flow nasal interface (HFNI) in patients requiring noninvasive respiratory support. The PTP is a physiological index that reflects the work of breathing and respiratory muscle effort. It is calculated using airway pressure and inspiratory time data over a defined period. The primary goal is to assess whether the symmetrical HFNI leads to a measurable reduction in the PTP, indicating improved respiratory mechanics and decreased patient effort.
Baseline and 15 minutes
Change in the pressure time product after the use of asymmetrical nasal high flow interface for 15 minutes.
This outcome measures the change in the Pressure-Time Product (PTP) before and after the application of a symmetrical high-flow nasal interface (HFNI) in patients requiring noninvasive respiratory support. The PTP is a physiological index that reflects the work of breathing and respiratory muscle effort. It is calculated using airway pressure and inspiratory time data over a defined period. The primary goal is to assess whether the asymmetrical HFNI leads to a measurable reduction in the PTP, indicating improved respiratory mechanics and decreased patient effort.
Baseline and 15 minutes
Study Arms (2)
Recovery patients from respiratory disease - Asymmetric or conventional nasal high flow cannula
EXPERIMENTALPatients recovered from acute respiratory disease will be randomized to NHF oxygen therapy with asymmetrical cannula or conventional cannula
Recovery patients from respiratory disease - Conventional or asymmetric nasal high flow cannula
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients recovered from acute respiratory disease will be randomized to NHF oxygen therapy with conventional cannula or asymmetrical cannula
Interventions
DUET asymmetric nasal high flow interface that fits best to patients' nostrils (size: one nostril of the patient should be fully occluded) Patients will be crossed - over between the 2 interventions
Well - established conventional nasal high flow cannula (size: medium) Patients will be cross - over between the 2 interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age ≥18 years old
- absence of symptoms and signs of respiratory failure (SpO2\>95% at FiΟ2 0.21)
You may not qualify if:
- pregnancy
- SpO2\<94% at FiΟ2 0.21
- neuromuscular disease
- contraindications to esophageal pressure monitoring (e.g., uncontrolled coagulopathy, esophageal disease, nasal trauma, allergy to local lidocaine)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University Hospital of Larissa, Department of Pulmonary Medicine
Larissa, 41222, Greece
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Demosthenes Makris
Professor of Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Larissa
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor of Respiratory & Emergency Medicine Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, Greece
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 24, 2025
First Posted
July 15, 2025
Study Start
April 9, 2024
Primary Completion
September 1, 2025
Study Completion
September 1, 2025
Last Updated
July 18, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share