NCT07061353

Brief Summary

Hemodialysis is a treatment method used in the treatment of acute or chronic renal failure, the main function of which is based on the cleaning of accumulated waste materials in the blood, and is rapidly developing and spreading in parallel with today's technology. Patients undergoing hemodialysis treatment are trying to cope with social and physical problems that may develop due to chronic disease. At the same time, their quality of life is affected due to the psychosocial, economic problems and complications brought about by machine dependency. From past to present, individuals have used various methods to protect/improve their health. Today, in addition to modern medicine, complementary/alternative therapies are increasingly used. One of these alternative therapies is the therapeutic touch application, which has recently gained popularity. Therapeutic touch is based on the therapeutic effect of the act of touching. Therapeutic touch, alternatively known as healing touch, is a complementary/alternative treatment method applied by touching energy points in the body. Therefore, this study was planned to examine the effect of therapeutic touch applied to hemodialysis patients on perceived stress and comfort levels. This study, planned as a randomized experimental study with a pre-test-post-test intervention control group, will be a study on dialysis patients receiving treatment at the hemodialysis unit of Fırat University Hospital between June 2025-June 2026. The sample will consist of a minimum of 60 dialysis patients (30 intervention, 30 control) who meet the research criteria and accept the study. The patients in the intervention and control groups will first be informed about the application before starting the application and their verbal and written consents will be obtained. Then, the Patient Identification Form, Visual Analog Scale-Comfort (VAS-Comfort), Hemodialysis Comfort Scale (HKS) and Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) will be applied and the 1st measurement will be obtained. The application will last approximately 15-30 minutes for the patients in the intervention group every three days. After three days of alternate application, data forms will be filled in again for patients and 2nd measurements will be obtained. During this period, no intervention will be made to patients in the control group and only the normal treatment protocol will be applied. At the end of three days, data forms will be filled in again and 2nd measurements will be obtained. In the analysis of data; frequency and percentage analyses, chi-square analysis, standard deviation, t-test in dependent groups, t-test analysis in independent groups will be performed.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
1mo left

Started Dec 2025

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress84%
Dec 2025Jun 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 2, 2025

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 11, 2025

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 31, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2026

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2026

Expected
Last Updated

November 18, 2025

Status Verified

November 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

July 2, 2025

Last Update Submit

November 14, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Therapeutic touchHemodialysis PatientStressComfortNursing

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Visual Analog Scale - Comfort

    The Visual Analog Scale was developed by Price et al. (1983) to assess pain intensity. In previous studies, VAS was also used to determine the comfort levels of patients. In this study, VAS was used to assess the comfort levels of patients. A score of 0 on the scale for comfort assessment indicates "I have no comfort at all", and a score of 10 indicates "I have great comfort".

    At the end of the third day

  • Hemodialysis Comfort Scale

    The scale, developed by Şahin Orak and colleagues (2017) to determine the comfort levels of hemodialysis patients, consists of 9 items and two sub-dimensions. The responses to item 4 of the scale are scored as "never" 1 point, "very rarely" 2 points, "sometimes" 3 points, "very often" 4 points and "always" 5 points. The scores given to the other items (1-3, 5-9) are scored in reverse: "never" 5 points, "very rarely" 4 points, "sometimes" 3 points, "very often" 2 points and "always" 1 point. The scale has two sub-dimensions: "Relaxation" (items 7-9) and "Overcoming" (items 1-6). The total score evaluation of the scale and its sub-dimensions is determined by calculating the average score. The increase in the total score obtained from the scale indicates that the comfort level increases. In the validity and reliability study of the developed scale, the Cronbach alpha value for the total scale was determined as 0.87.

    At the end of the third day

  • Perceived Stress Scale

    The Perceived Stress Scale was developed by Cohen et al. in 1983 to determine the level of stress that threatens human health. Its Turkish validity and reliability were determined by Eskin et al. (2013). The scale consists of 2 factors: "insufficient self-efficacy" and "stress" perception. The scale is a 5-point Likert-type scale and consists of 14 items. As the scores obtained from the scale increase, the stress level perceived by the person also increases. PSS scores range from 0 to 56, with a score range of 0-35 indicating a normal stress level and a score range of 35-56 indicating that the individual is under stress. In the original study of the scale, the Cronbach Alpha coefficient was found to be 0.84

    At the end of the third day

Study Arms (2)

Therapeutic Touch

EXPERIMENTAL

Therapeutic Touch group

Behavioral: Therapeutic touch

Control

NO INTERVENTION

No therapeutic touch group

Interventions

Therapeutic touch will be performed

Therapeutic Touch

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • At least 3 months of hemodialysis treatment • Cognitive function is in place

You may not qualify if:

  • Those with communication problems
  • Those who do not agree to participate in the study
  • Patients who receive traditional treatment for the disease

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Fırat university

Elâzığ, Center, 25240, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Therapeutic Touch

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Mind-Body TherapiesComplementary TherapiesTherapeuticsSpiritual Therapies

Central Study Contacts

Gülcan Bahçecioğlu Turan

CONTACT

Eda Doğan

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The person performing the analysis will be blinded.
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 2, 2025

First Posted

July 11, 2025

Study Start

December 31, 2025

Primary Completion

March 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Last Updated

November 18, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations