NCT07061197

Brief Summary

This online randomized controlled trial will evaluate whether adding a key information section to patient information leaflets leads to more accurate expectations and improves participants' understanding. We will test the impact of including quantitative information on drug benefits in addition to qualitative statements, versus including qualitative statements only. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: (1) a standard patient leaflet that contains no information on drug benefits, (2) a leaflet featuring a key information section that includes qualitative statements about drug benefits, or (3) a leaflet featuring a key information section that includes quantitative information about drug benefits in addition to qualitative statements.

Trial Health

35
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
2,100

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable cancer

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2025

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 2, 2025

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 11, 2025

Completed
21 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

July 11, 2025

Status Verified

July 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

Same day

First QC Date

July 2, 2025

Last Update Submit

July 2, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

CancerPrescription drug information

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Expectations

    Multiple choice questions assessing expectations about the benefits of tivozanib, a cancer drug approved by the European Medicines Agency. For example, "does Fotivda cure advanced kidney cancer?" Measured on a 4 point-Likert scale: definitely yes; probably yes; probably no; definitely no.. See attached protocol.

    Assessed during 15-minute survey.

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Understanding

    Assessed during 15-minute survey.

  • Perceived magnitude of benefits and harms

    Assessed during 15-minute survey

  • Satisfaction with information in the patient leaflet

    Assessed during 15-minute survey.

Study Arms (3)

Control (standard patient leaflet)

PLACEBO COMPARATOR
Other: Control (standard patient leaflet)

Patient leaflet with the EMA's proposed key information section including qualitative statements

EXPERIMENTAL
Other: Patient leaflet with the EMA's proposed key information section including qualitative statements.

Patient leaflet with a key information section providing qualitative and quantitative information

EXPERIMENTAL
Other: Patient leaflet with a key information section providing both qualitative and quantitative information on drug benefits and harms.

Interventions

The standard patient leaflet supplemented with a key information section. This section included qualitative descriptions of the goal of treatment, the main benefits, contraindications, and the most serious side effects. The content was designed to reflect the EMA's proposed format for improving the patient information leaflet.

Patient leaflet with the EMA's proposed key information section including qualitative statements

The standard patient information leaflet for a recently approved cancer drug, tivozanib (Fotivda), obtained electronically from the EMA website. The standard patient information does not contain structured benefit information.

Control (standard patient leaflet)

The standard patient leaflet, supplemented with a key information section including quantitative data on the drug's main benefits and side effects, presented in a summary table format. This section provided structured information about the indication and goal of treatment, how the drug was studied (the comparator treatment and number of patients enrolled in the clinical trial that supported the drug's approval), and data on the drug's benefits and side effects.

Patient leaflet with a key information section providing qualitative and quantitative information

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adults 18 years of age and older,
  • Adults fluent in English,
  • Adults residing in the United Kingdom (i.e., nationally representative sample of UK adults).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Neoplasms

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Double-blind
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 2, 2025

First Posted

July 11, 2025

Study Start

August 1, 2025

Primary Completion

August 1, 2025

Study Completion

August 1, 2025

Last Updated

July 11, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share