Erector Spınae Plane Block and Transmuscular Quadratus Lumborum Block In Kıdney Transplantatıon
Comparıson Of Analgesıc Effectıveness Of Erector Spınae Plane Block and Transmuscular Quadratus Lumborum Block In Kıdney Transplantatıon
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Perioperative anesthesia and pain management are among the difficult situations for anesthesiologists to manage in kidney transplant patients. These patients are often complicated by comorbidities related to chronic kidney disease. The main issues in postoperative pain management for kidney transplant patients include dose adjustment, prevention of further renal damage, and maintenance of graft perfusion. Pain management in patients with end-stage renal disease may be inadequate due to limited options of systemic analgesics. In addition, regional analgesia techniques can be considered to avoid the adverse effects of anesthetics and systemic analgesics (1). Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a regional fascial plane block method developed in recent years. In this method, analgesia is provided by injecting local anesthetic between the transverse process and the erector spinae muscles and anesthetizing the dorsal and ventral branches of the regional spinal nerves. It has a wide range of applications including thoracic, lumbar, and thoracic and abdominal surgeries (2,3). Transmuscular quadratus lumborum block (TMQLB) is a nerve block technique in which local anesthetic is applied to the fascial plane between the psoas major (PM) and quadratus lumborum (QL) muscles. Anatomical evidence has shown that local anesthetic can spread through the thoracolumbar fascia into the thoracic paravertebral space, thus infiltrating the thoracic spinal nerves and sympathetic trunk, providing both somatic and visceral analgesia for abdominal surgery (4). This study aims to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of ESPB and TMQLB in terms of pain management after kidney transplantation. The primary aim of the study was to evaluate pain scores and analgesic consumption between groups in the 24-hour postoperative period. The secondary aim was to evaluate the time to first analgesic requirement after block, the number of patients requiring analgesics, and the levels of nausea and vomiting.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 25, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 23, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 10, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2025
CompletedJanuary 16, 2026
June 1, 2025
5 months
June 23, 2025
January 15, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
evaluate pain scores and analgesic consumption between groups
Patients' pain levels will be measured at 0, 1, 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours using a 10-point VAS. No pain will be assessed as 0 points, and severe pain will be assessed as 10 points.
postoperative 24 hours
Study Arms (2)
erectör spinae plane block
ACTIVE COMPARATORErector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a regional fascial plane block method developed in recent years. In this method, analgesia is provided by injecting local anesthetic between the transverse process and the erector spinae muscles and anesthetizing the dorsal and ventral branches of the regional spinal nerves. It has a wide range of use in thoracic, lumbar, and thoracic and abdominal surgeries
Transmuskuler quadratus lumborum block
ACTIVE COMPARATORTransmuscular quadratus lumborum block (TMQLB) is a nerve block technique in which local anesthetic is applied to the fascial plane between the psoas major (PM) and quadratus lumborum (QL) muscles. Anatomical evidence has shown that local anesthetic can spread through the thoracolumbar fascia into the thoracic paravertebral space, thus infiltrating the thoracic spinal nerves and sympathetic trunk, providing both somatic and visceral analgesia for abdominal surgery
Interventions
Under general anesthesia, patients in the ESP group will be positioned in the left or right lateral decubitus position, depending on the side of the surgical procedure. After the T10 spinous process is identified by manual examination, sterile conditions will be established. The transverse process and erector spinae muscles will be visualized using an ultrasound probe. Using an in-plane technique, 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected between the transverse process and erector spinae muscles using a 22-gauge blocking needle.
Following standard anesthesia monitoring, patients will be placed in the lateral decubitus position. After the field is sterilized, a 2-5 MHz convex ultrasound probe (Samsung, HM70 EVO) will be placed between the iliac crest and costal arch at the level of the posterior axillary line. The transverse process of the L4 vertebra, erector spinae, QL, and PM muscles will be visualized. After inducing local anesthesia with 2% lidocaine (2 ml), a blocking needle (22G\*100 mm, Braun) will be advanced from posterolateral to anteromedial, inserting it between the QL and PM muscles, and 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Renal transplantation
- Patients between the ages of 18-65
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who do not agree to participate in the study,
- Patients havecoagulopathy, liver function problems, local anesthetic allergy
- Body mass index (BMI) \> 40
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Kartal Dr Lutfi Kirdar City Hospital
Istanbul, Kartal, 34000, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- ASSOCİATED PROFESSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 23, 2025
First Posted
July 10, 2025
Study Start
March 25, 2025
Primary Completion
August 30, 2025
Study Completion
September 30, 2025
Last Updated
January 16, 2026
Record last verified: 2025-06