Empowering Caregivers to Promote Child Independence
2 other identifiers
interventional
32
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The proposed study aims to address the unique needs of caregivers and their adolescent children with profound autism. The constant supervision and 24/7 care that caregivers need to provide their children to ensure their health and safety often leaves little time for household duties, self-care routines, and spending time with family and friends. Investigators aim to alleviate the vigilant monitoring provided by caregivers for brief periods by increasing their child's independent, sustained engagement in meaningful activities and improving the quality of life for both adolescents with profound autism and their caregivers. Caregivers will either receive training to use picture-based activity schedules or continue with their usual routines. After the study, caregivers who continued their usual routines will also be offered the training. Investigators will evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the training based on the children's performance, pre- and post-study improvement ratings, and caregiver feedback.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 9, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 10, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 15, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 31, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 31, 2026
CompletedOctober 10, 2025
July 1, 2025
9 months
June 9, 2025
October 8, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Number of Participant Accrued
Number of caregivers who accept random assignment as determined by refusal rate of eligible participants.
Until accrual is complete, approximately 1 year
Rate of Participant Attrition
Participant attrition rate will be determined over the course of the study.
Up to 6 weeks
Ratings of Caregiver Activity Schedules Treatment Acceptability
The acceptability of the Caregiver Activity Schedules Treatment (CAST) intervention by the caregiver will be measured using a 1 to 5 scale (anchored by 1 strongly disagree, and 5, strongly agree) by average ratings of agree (4) or strongly agree (5) to all acceptability rating scale statements and adolescents willingness to participate in intervention sessions.
Up to 6 weeks
Caregiver Reported Continued Use of Activity Schedules Treatment
The reported continued use of the Caregiver Activity Schedules Treatment activity schedules at home by the caregiver will be determined at 6-weeks by responses to a 5 question open-ended questionaire.
Up to 6 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Total Number of Activities Completed
Baseline (enrollment) to end of treatment, up to 6 weeks
Number of Consecutive Activities Completed
Baseline (enrollment) to end of treatment, up to 6 weeks
Duration of Sustained Activity Engagement
Baseline (enrollment) to end of treatment, up to 6 weeks
Number of Prompts to Complete Activities
Baseline (enrollment) to end of treatment, up to 6 weeks
Number of Redirections to Stay on Task
Baseline (enrollment) to end of treatment, up to 6 weeks
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Treatment as Usual
NO INTERVENTIONTreatment as Usual (TAU) will consist of 3-6 weeks of continuing usual care.
Caregiver Activity Schedules Treatment
EXPERIMENTALCaregiver Activity Schedules Treatment (CAST) consists of a picture-based activity schedule compiled into binders created for each participant. Activities for each participant will be selected with caregivers to include preference and feasibility. Activity steps include 1) opening the schedule/turning the page, 2) orienting to the picture, 3) retrieving the activity, 4) completing the activity, 5) putting the activity away, and 6) repeating each step until all activities are completed. Graduated guidance without verbal prompts will be used to support schedule completion. Implementer proximity will be faded within and between sessions. Caregivers will receive written descriptions of procedures. The researcher will describe and model all procedures and answer questions. Caregivers will implement procedures with their child and receive in-vivo feedback.
Interventions
Activity completion will be evaluated based the number of consecutive and total activities completed, duration of sustained activity engagement, prompts or redirection, and adult proximity at baseline and post-trial.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Autistic individuals 10 to 17 years of age
- Severe or profound intellectual disability diagnosis or reportedly in line with diagnostic criteria based on Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, Second Edition ADOS-2
- Developmental Profile 4 (DP-4) Cognitive/Communication Domain scores below 70 (Delayed)
- Adaptive Behavior Assessment System (ABAS-3) Communication, Health and Safety, and Leisure Domains adaptive skill scores in the Low to Extremely Low range
- Can complete between 3-10 simple leisure or daily living skill tasks or activities independently (caregiver may prompt or provide oversight)
- Caregivers can remain present to assist with toileting if more than one person is needed to assist
- No medication or stable medication regimen with no planned changes for study duration
- Stable intervention and/or educational services with no planned changes for study duration
- English spoken by at least one caregiver
You may not qualify if:
- Known serious medical condition or serious behavioral/psychiatric condition requiring immediate alternative focused intervention
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Nebraskalead
- Autism Science Foundationcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Munroe-Meyer Insitute University of Nebraska Medical Center
Omaha, Nebraska, 68106, United States
Related Publications (23)
Scahill L, Shillingsburg MA, Ousley O, Pileggi ML, Kilbourne RL, Buckley D, Gillespie SE, McCracken C. A Randomized Trial of Direct Instruction Language for Learning in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2022 Jun;61(6):772-781. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2021.11.034. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
PMID: 35093490BACKGROUNDBearss K, Johnson C, Smith T, Lecavalier L, Swiezy N, Aman M, McAdam DB, Butter E, Stillitano C, Minshawi N, Sukhodolsky DG, Mruzek DW, Turner K, Neal T, Hallett V, Mulick JA, Green B, Handen B, Deng Y, Dziura J, Scahill L. Effect of parent training vs parent education on behavioral problems in children with autism spectrum disorder: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015 Apr 21;313(15):1524-33. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.3150.
PMID: 25898050BACKGROUNDSheridan E, Gillespie S, Johnson CR, Lecavalier L, Smith T, Swiezy N, Turner K, Pritchett J, Mruzek DW, Evans AN, Bearss K, Scahill L. Using Parent Target Problem Narratives to Evaluate Outcomes in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol. 2021 Nov;49(11):1527-1535. doi: 10.1007/s10802-021-00843-8. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
PMID: 34213717BACKGROUNDHirst K, Zamzow RM, Stichter JP, Beversdorf DQ. A Pilot Feasibility Study Assessing the Combined Effects of Early Behavioral Intervention and Propranolol on Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). Children (Basel). 2023 Sep 30;10(10):1639. doi: 10.3390/children10101639.
PMID: 37892301BACKGROUNDShillingsburg MA, Hansen B, Wright M. Rapport Building and Instructional Fading Prior to Discrete Trial Instruction: Moving From Child-Led Play to Intensive Teaching. Behav Modif. 2019 Mar;43(2):288-306. doi: 10.1177/0145445517751436. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
PMID: 29338313BACKGROUNDGordon KR, Shillingsburg MA. Teaching mands for social information to individuals with develop mental disabilities. Adv Neurodev Disord. 2019;3;363-371. doi: 10.1007/s41252-019-00126-w
BACKGROUNDFrampton SE, Shillingsburg MA, Simeone PJ. Feasibility and Preliminary Efficacy of Direct Instruction for Individuals With Autism Utilizing Speech-Generating Devices. Behav Anal Pract. 2020 Feb 11;13(3):648-658. doi: 10.1007/s40617-020-00412-3. eCollection 2020 Sep.
PMID: 32953393BACKGROUNDShillingsburg MA, Frampton SE, Juban B, Weddle SA, Silva MR. Implementing an applied verbal behavior model in classrooms. Behav Intervent. 2022;37(1), 56-78. doi.org/10.1002/bin.1807
BACKGROUNDKoyama T, Wang HT. Use of activity schedule to promote independent performance of individuals with autism and other intellectual disabilities: a review. Res Dev Disabil. 2011 Nov-Dec;32(6):2235-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.05.003. Epub 2011 Jun 6.
PMID: 21645988BACKGROUNDLequia J, Machalicek W, Rispoli MJ. Effects of activity schedules on challenging behavior exhibited in children with autism spectrum disorders: A systematic review. Res Autism Spectr Disord. 2012;6(1); 480- 492. doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2011.07.008
BACKGROUND. Cho S, Noor NHBM, Sonoyama S. A review of activity schedules for individuals with autism spectrum disorder. J of Spec Educ Resear. 2017;5(2):65-76. doi:10.6033/specialeducation.5.65
BACKGROUNDCavalari RN, Romanczyk RG. Caregiver perspectives on unintentional injury risk in children with an autism spectrum disorder. J Pediatr Nurs. 2012 Dec;27(6):632-41. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2011.07.013. Epub 2011 Sep 13.
PMID: 23101727BACKGROUNDKnight V, Sartini E, Spriggs AD. Evaluating visual activity schedules as evidence-based practice for individuals with autism spectrum disorders. J Autism Dev Disord. 2015 Jan;45(1):157-78. doi: 10.1007/s10803-014-2201-z.
PMID: 25081593BACKGROUNDLang R., O'Reilly M, Rispoli M, Shogren K., Machalicek W, Sigafoos J, Regester A. Review of interventions to increase functional and symbolic play in children with autism. Educ and Train in Dev Disab. 2009;44;481-492. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24234257
BACKGROUNDSchwartz IS, Kelly EM. Quality of life for people with disabilities: Why applied behavior analysts should consider this a primary dependent variable. Resear and Pract Severe Disabil. 2021;46(3);159-172. doi.org/10.1177/15407969211033629
BACKGROUNDEdwards CK, Landa RK, Frampton SE, Shillingsburg MA. Increasing Functional Leisure Engagement for Children With Autism Using Backward Chaining. Behav Modif. 2018 Jan;42(1):9-33. doi: 10.1177/0145445517699929. Epub 2017 May 3.
PMID: 28466648BACKGROUNDCelia T, Freysteinson W, Fredland N, Bowyer P. Battle weary/battle ready: A phenomenological study of parents' lived experiences caring for children with autism and their safety concerns. J Adv Nurs. 2020 Jan;76(1):221-233. doi: 10.1111/jan.14213. Epub 2019 Oct 27.
PMID: 31566790BACKGROUNDVaz S, Thomson A, Cuomo B, Falkmer T, Chamberlain A, Black MH. Co-occurring intellectual disability and autism: Associations with stress, coping, time use, and quality of life in caregivers. Research in ASD. 2021; 84;101765. doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2021.101765
BACKGROUNDMarsack-Topolewski CN, Church HL. Impact of Caregiver Burden on Quality of Life for Parents of Adult Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder. Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2019 Mar;124(2):145-156. doi: 10.1352/1944-7558-124.2.145.
PMID: 30835531BACKGROUNDDupont A. A study concerning the time-related and other burdens when severely handicapped children are reared at home. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavia. 1980;62(Suppl. 285);249-257.
BACKGROUNDDudley, Carolyn and Emery, J. C. Herbert.The Value of Caregiver Time: Costs of Support and Care for Individuals Living with Autism Spectrum Disorder. SPP Research Paper. 2014; 7-1. doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2379633
BACKGROUNDLord C, Charman T, Havdahl A, Carbone P, Anagnostou E, Boyd B, Carr T, de Vries PJ, Dissanayake C, Divan G, Freitag CM, Gotelli MM, Kasari C, Knapp M, Mundy P, Plank A, Scahill L, Servili C, Shattuck P, Simonoff E, Singer AT, Slonims V, Wang PP, Ysrraelit MC, Jellett R, Pickles A, Cusack J, Howlin P, Szatmari P, Holbrook A, Toolan C, McCauley JB. The Lancet Commission on the future of care and clinical research in autism. Lancet. 2022 Jan 15;399(10321):271-334. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01541-5. Epub 2021 Dec 6. No abstract available.
PMID: 34883054BACKGROUNDHughes MM, Shaw KA, DiRienzo M, Durkin MS, Esler A, Hall-Lande J, Wiggins L, Zahorodny W, Singer A, Maenner MJ. The Prevalence and Characteristics of Children With Profound Autism, 15 Sites, United States, 2000-2016. Public Health Rep. 2023 Nov-Dec;138(6):971-980. doi: 10.1177/00333549231163551. Epub 2023 Apr 19.
PMID: 37074176BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Alice Shillingsburg, PhD, BCBA-D
University of Nebraska
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 9, 2025
First Posted
July 10, 2025
Study Start
July 15, 2025
Primary Completion
March 31, 2026
Study Completion
March 31, 2026
Last Updated
October 10, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Time Frame
- October 1, 2025
- Access Criteria
- All IPD and supporting information will be availabile in the open science data repository the National Database for Autism Research (NDAR)
All study outcome measures will be shared with the National Database for Autism Reserch. Global Unique Identifiers will be used to share data from the study and all indentifying participant information will be removed before sharing.