NCT07056959

Brief Summary

A stable band of keratinized mucosa (KM) around dental implants is thought to minimize tissue recession and provide resistance against mechanical, chemical, and microbial challenges, thereby preserving peri-implant tissue health. Soft tissue augmentation is often employed to enhance the soft tissue phenotype in such cases. While autogenous grafts such as free gingival grafts (FGG) remain the gold standard, xenogeneic collagen matrices (XCM) have emerged as promising alternatives, offering reduced patient morbidity and surgical time. This randomized controlled clinical trial aims to compare the clinical efficacy and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of XCM versus FGG for soft tissue phenotype modification when performed during healing abutment connection around dental implants, with evaluations at both short-term (6 months) and long-term (1 and 2 years) intervals. Thirty participants will be recruited at Dubai Health Dental Hospital and randomly assigned to receive either XCM (test) or FGG (control) augmentation. Clinical assessments will be conducted at baseline (T0), 2 weeks (T2w), and at 1 (T1), 3 (T3), 6 (T6), 12 (T12), and 24 (T24) months post-surgery. The primary outcome is the change in KM width, measured from the mucosal margin to the mucogingival junction. Secondary outcomes include KM thickness, supracrestal tissue height, and soft tissue dimensional changes, assessed using intraoral scans (Trios 5) and superimposed STL files. Additional measurements include peri-implant soft tissue level and phenotype. PROMs will be recorded in the first postoperative week and at the 3-year mark using a visual analog scale (VAS). Clinical indices such as plaque index, bleeding index, and probing depth will be evaluated at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years. Marginal bone level changes and implant survival rates will also be tracked throughout the study period.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
25mo left

Started Nov 2025

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress20%
Nov 2025Jun 2028

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 29, 2025

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 9, 2025

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2025

Completed
2.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2027

Expected
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2028

Last Updated

December 4, 2025

Status Verified

June 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2.1 years

First QC Date

June 29, 2025

Last Update Submit

November 26, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

keratinized mucosaimplantssoft tissue augmentation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Changes in Keratinized Mucosa width

    Changes in KM width - as measured from the free mucosal margin to the mucogingival junction at the mid-buccal aspect of the implant abutment or crown with a UNC-15 probe; at the follow-up time point relative to the baseline at T0

    6 months

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Changes in KM thickness and supracrestal tissue height

    6 months

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs)

    6 months

Study Arms (2)

Test group - Mucograft

EXPERIMENTAL

XCM (Mucograft©, Geistlich Pharma® AG, Wolhusen, Switzerland) when placed at the time of healing abutment connection and its impact on peri-implant soft tissue phenotype modification

Procedure: Soft tissue substitute for peri-implant phenotype modification

Control Group - Free gingival graft

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Use of Free gingival graft placed at the time of healing abutment connection and its impact on peri-implant soft tissue phenotype modification

Procedure: Control Group - Free gingival graft for soft tissue augmentation

Interventions

XCM (Mucograft©, Geistlich Pharma® AG, Wolhusen, Switzerland) placed at the time of healing abutment connection and its impact on peri-implant soft tissue phenotype modification when

Test group - Mucograft

Free gingival graft around implants placed at the time of healing abutment connection and its impact on peri-implant soft tissue phenotype modification

Control Group - Free gingival graft

Eligibility Criteria

Age21 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Aged 21 or over.
  • Insufficient KM width (\< 2 mm) at the buccal aspect of implants at time of healing abutment placement, either for single anterior or posterior implants.
  • Controlled oral hygiene (full-mouth plaque and bleeding scores ≤ 25% at baseline).
  • Good compliance and commitment to attend follow-up review appointments.
  • Willing to provide informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • Smoking
  • Untreated localized or generalized periodontal diseases
  • Uncontrolled systemic diseases
  • Long term use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications
  • History of malignancy, radiotherapy or chemotherapy
  • Collagen allergy
  • History of mucogingival surgery

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Dubai Dental Hospital

Dubai, United Arab Emirates

RECRUITING

Related Publications (3)

  • Sanz M, Lorenzo R, Aranda JJ, Martin C, Orsini M. Clinical evaluation of a new collagen matrix (Mucograft prototype) to enhance the width of keratinized tissue in patients with fixed prosthetic restorations: a randomized prospective clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2009 Oct;36(10):868-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01460.x. Epub 2009 Aug 12.

  • Naenni N, Bienz SP, Benic GI, Jung RE, Hammerle CHF, Thoma DS. Volumetric and linear changes at dental implants following grafting with volume-stable three-dimensional collagen matrices or autogenous connective tissue grafts: 6-month data. Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Apr;22(3):1185-1195. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2210-3. Epub 2017 Sep 18.

  • Cosyn J, Eeckhout C, De Bruyckere T, Eghbali A, Vervaeke S, Younes F, Christiaens V. A multi-centre randomized controlled trial comparing connective tissue graft with collagen matrix to increase soft tissue thickness at the buccal aspect of single implants: 1-year results. J Clin Periodontol. 2022 Sep;49(9):911-921. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13691. Epub 2022 Jul 20.

Central Study Contacts

Maanas shah, BDS MSD CAGS MRACDS

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 29, 2025

First Posted

July 9, 2025

Study Start

November 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2028

Last Updated

December 4, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-06

Locations