NCT07056075

Brief Summary

Although sedation during endoscopy is sufficiently safe, desaturations are among the most common side effects of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedures, occurring in approximately 20-30% of cases. Sedation during endoscopy increases the complication rate, and a significant proportion of severe and serious side effects are respiratory/airway-related. However, most patients require sedation to complete the procedure and achieve adequate outcomes during therapeutic ERCP. Therefore, improved measures to increase ERCP safety are needed. Since the demand for anesthesia in many centers already (far) exceeds current capacities, performing additional ERCPs under general anesthesia is not an option. Innovative ways to improve cardiorespiratory monitoring or respiratory management during ERCP could offer a solution without significantly increasing costs. Fortunately, dedicated devices for respiratory management and/or monitoring during endoscopy already exist, but their impact on improving patient safety has not yet been well studied. Therefore, the aim of this prospective, randomized, open-label, non-interventional study is to investigate the effects of non-invasive airway management and respiratory monitoring devices on desaturation rate during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. For this purpose, 288 adult patients (male and female, 18+ years) undergoing ERCP for medical reasons will be enrolled and randomized to one of three groups: (i) airway management using positive airway pressure (PAP group), (ii) additional monitoring using capnography (capnography group), and (iii) a control group with standard monitoring/treatment (i.e., 2 L O2/min via nasal cannula) (control group). Patients are monitored during the ERCP procedure according to medical standards (non-invasive blood oxygen saturation measurement = SpO2, regular non-invasive blood pressure measurement, pulse), and all desaturation events (defined as an SpO2 \<85% for any duration according to guidelines) are recorded and treated according to guideline recommendations (the studies do not specify any measures for the (non-)treatment of desaturations). After the procedure, patients are followed (passively) for 30 days (review of medical records) to record late complications. The main outcome parameter is the comparison of the desaturation rate in the PAP versus the control group.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
288

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
8mo left

Started Jul 2025

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress56%
Jul 2025Dec 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 24, 2025

Completed
13 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 7, 2025

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 9, 2025

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 30, 2026

Expected
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 30, 2026

Last Updated

March 24, 2026

Status Verified

December 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1.4 years

First QC Date

June 24, 2025

Last Update Submit

March 21, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

ERCPSedation-related adverse eventsdesaturationtrial

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Difference in desaturation rate

    Differences of rates of desaturations (i.e., SpO2 \<85% for any duration) of the PAP group vs. the standard management group

    during endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography

Secondary Outcomes (11)

  • Difference in desaturation rate

    during endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography

  • Difference in desaturation rate

    during endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography

  • Difference in desaturation rate

    during endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography

  • Rates of interventions for hypoxemic events

    during endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography

  • Rates of interventions for hypoxemic events

    during endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography

  • +6 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

PAP group

EXPERIMENTAL

Nasal PAP Ventilation System

Device: Nasal PAP Ventilation System

Control group

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Standard management consisting of low-flow oxygen through nasal cannula

Device: Low Flow Oxygen

Capnometry group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

capnometry and low-flow oxygen through nasal cannula

Device: Low Flow OxygenDevice: Capnometry

Interventions

capnometry measurement

Capnometry group

medical devices that provide nasal positive airway pressure ventilation during endoscopy

Also known as: nasal positive airway pressure
PAP group

low flow oxygen though nasal cannula

Capnometry groupControl group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 99 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • undergoing an interventional (intent) ERCP procedure
  • years
  • Male or female
  • Nurse-administered sedation

You may not qualify if:

  • History of allergic reaction to Propofol
  • Tracheostomy
  • Procedure requiring intubation, general anesthesia, or anesthesiologist backup (acute exacerbation of obstructive lung disease, acute congestive heart failure, supra-glottic or sub-glottic tumor, septic shock, e.g.) according to the endoscopist in charge
  • Pregnant patients

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Medical University Graz

Graz, Austria

RECRUITING

Department of Internal Medicine 2, University Hospital of St Pölten

Sankt Pölten, 3100, Austria

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Hypoxia

Interventions

Continuous Positive Airway PressureCapnography

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Signs and Symptoms, RespiratorySigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Positive-Pressure RespirationRespiration, ArtificialAirway ManagementTherapeuticsRespiratory TherapyRespiratory Function TestsDiagnostic Techniques, Respiratory SystemDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosis

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Clinician Researcher

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 24, 2025

First Posted

July 9, 2025

Study Start

July 7, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2026

Last Updated

March 24, 2026

Record last verified: 2025-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations