NCT07049419

Brief Summary

Within the UK there are over 15 million people who live with at least one long term condition. Of these people, over 4 million suffer from mental health problems. Environmental control systems are a type of assistive technology that can be controlled by a wide variety of different access methods (e.g. switches) and can assist people with physical disabilities usually with a neurological condition to control various electronic devices in the home environment. The systems are designed to provide independence, removing the requirement to be reliant on other people (for the operation of the controlled devices) and potentially could have a positive effect on mental health and quality of life. The research question for this study is to determine impact of environmental controls on mental health. It is hypothesised that there will be a positive impact on mental health of the participants. The question above will be answered by collecting questionnaire data pre and post intervention. Participants will be identified by Clinical Scientists working in NHS Lothian's Environmental Control Service (ECS). Participants will be recruited from NHS Lothian and so will be living in the Lothian area. The patient will be contacted following the normal protocol for arranging an environmental control assessment, at which point they will be approached to join the study. Participants will answer questions in their home environment both in person and over the phone. The end point of the study will be 14 months from the start date (allowing for follow up data to be collected for anyone recruited towards the end of the 12-month recruitment period.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
5

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2024

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 29, 2024

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 27, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 27, 2025

Completed
23 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 19, 2025

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 3, 2025

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

April 7, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

May 5, 2026

Status Verified

January 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1.3 years

First QC Date

June 19, 2025

Results QC Date

January 29, 2026

Last Update Submit

April 14, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Environmental controlsActivities of daily livingMental healthSelf-help devicesPsychological well-being

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Percentage of Participants Achieving MCID in PROMIS Global10 Score.

    Percentage of participants who achieved the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in the PROMIS-10 Mental Health score from baseline to post-intervention. The MCID for this measure was defined as an improvement of ≥6 points on the PROMIS-10 Mental Health T-score. All scoring was performed according to standard PROMIS guidelines. All participants included in the analysis met the MCID threshold for this outcome. Therefore, the number of participants achieving MCID is equal to the number analysed. These values represent actual measured data and are not placeholders.

    From baseline to 8 weeks post installation of the environmental control system.

  • Percentage of Participants Achieving MCID in the PIADS.

    The Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS) is a self-report questionnaire measuring the perceived impact of assistive technology on psychological well-being, functional independence, and quality of life. The outcome measure was the percentage of participants who achieved the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in the PIADS total score from baseline to post-intervention. The MCID was defined as an improvement of ≥0.5 points on the PIADS scale. Scoring was conducted according to standard PIADS procedures.

    From baseline to 8 weeks post installation of the environmental control system.

Study Arms (1)

Environmental control system users

Patients who are eligible for environmental control system users as part of standard clinical care.

Device: Provision of an environmental control system

Interventions

Part of standard clinical care for patients referred to the NHS Lothian environmental control service.

Environmental control system users

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

NHS Lothian patients who have been referred to the Environmental Control Service and are eligible for environmental controls.

You may qualify if:

  • Eligible for environmental control system (as per NHS Scotland criteria).
  • New user (no previous intervention).
  • Neurological condition.
  • Cognitive ability to answer the questions and to give consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • Previous environmental control intervention.
  • Patients requiring equipment not supplied by NHS Lothian's ECS (e.g. door interface).
  • Patient recently diagnosed (within 6 months).
  • Rapidly deteriorating condition.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

SMART Centre

Edinburgh, EH9 2HL, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Vessoyan K, Steckle G, Easton B, Nichols M, Mok Siu V, McDougall J. Using eye-tracking technology for communication in Rett syndrome: perceptions of impact. Augment Altern Commun. 2018 Sep;34(3):230-241. doi: 10.1080/07434618.2018.1462848. Epub 2018 Apr 27.

    PMID: 29703090BACKGROUND
  • Terwee CB, Peipert JD, Chapman R, Lai JS, Terluin B, Cella D, Griffiths P, Mokkink LB. Minimal important change (MIC): a conceptual clarification and systematic review of MIC estimates of PROMIS measures. Qual Life Res. 2021 Oct;30(10):2729-2754. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02925-y. Epub 2021 Jul 10.

    PMID: 34247326BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Nervous System DiseasesPsychological Well-Being

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Personal SatisfactionBehavior

Limitations and Caveats

The sample size and demographic characteristics may limit generalisability. All outcome analyses are reported in the corresponding results tables.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Graham Henderson
Organization
NHS Lothian

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE ONLY
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 19, 2025

First Posted

July 3, 2025

Study Start

January 29, 2024

Primary Completion

May 27, 2025

Study Completion

May 27, 2025

Last Updated

May 5, 2026

Results First Posted

April 7, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

IPD is not required to be shared.

Locations