Early NK Precut vs TPS in Difficult Cannulation: A RCT (ENKPT Trial)
ENKPT
Comparison of Early Needle-knife Precut Papillotomy Over a Pancreatic Stent and Transpancreatic Sphincterotomy in Difficult Cannulation: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
300
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Hello. This study is about a special kind of endoscopy called ERCP, which is used to treat bile duct infections, gallstones, and blockages that cause jaundice. Normally, doctors use a standard method to insert a tube into the bile duct during the procedure. However, even skilled doctors sometimes have trouble - in about 10% to 20% of patients, it's difficult to get the tube in. When this happens, doctors use advanced techniques called "precut" methods to help make the procedure successful. One of these is called "early needle-knife precut," which is done after trying for 5 minutes without success. Studies have shown this method can reduce the chance of getting pancreatitis (inflammation of the pancreas) afterward. There are two common types of these advanced techniques: Needle-knife precut over a pancreatic stent, which gently opens the area using a small cut over a temporary plastic tube. Transpancreatic sphincterotomy, which also helps open the duct through a different approach. Both methods can help the procedure succeed and have similar safety results. However, not many studies have compared these two methods early on in the procedure when a pancreatic stent is used. This study wants to compare them in a safe and scientific way. If you or your family member agrees to join, the doctor will explain everything clearly. Joining is completely voluntary, and saying "no" will not affect the medical care you receive.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Dec 2021
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 17, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 3, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 28, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 28, 2025
CompletedJuly 3, 2025
June 1, 2025
3.8 years
June 17, 2025
June 30, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Success rate of common bile duct (CBD) cannulation
Successful selective biliary cannulation using the assigned intervention during the index ERCP session.
During the ERCP procedure (up to 60 minutes)
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP)
Within 24 hours after ERCP
Incidence of perforation
Within 72 hours after ERCP
Study Arms (2)
NKP-SIPS group
EXPERIMENTALknife precut papillotomy following the pancreas stent placement
TPS group
ACTIVE COMPARATORTranpancreatic sphincterotomy followed by the pancreas stent placement
Interventions
If the papilla was treated with three unintended MPD cannulations, a needle-knife precut papillotomy with a small incision over a pancreatic stent (NKP-SIPS)
TPS was performed as Goff reported; in short, after cannulation of the pancreatic duct was achieved, a pull-sphincterotome on a guidewire was used to cut the septum between the bile and pancreatic ducts along the direction from 11 o'clock to 12 o'clock. After that, the pancreatic stent is placed first, and the sphincterotomy is extended to expose the biliary lumen, and the biliary duct can be cannulated.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- At least 20 years old and needed ERCP intervention for obstructive jaundice. They presented the "difficult CBD cannulation".
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with successful CBD cannulation within 5 minutes of standard attempts and fewer than three passages of the guidewire into the main pancreatic duct (MPD)
- Previous sphincterotomy,
- Peripapillary diverticula,
- Active pancreatitis,
- Prior gastric surgery,
- Current use of antiplatelet agents,
- Coagulopathy,
- Peri-ampullary tumor-related obstruction,
- Pregnancy,
- Refused or were unable to give informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Kaohsiung City, Others, 833, Taiwan
Related Publications (2)
Pecsi D, Farkas N, Hegyi P, Balasko M, Czimmer J, Garami A, Illes A, Mosztbacher D, Par G, Parniczky A, Sarlos P, Szabo I, Szemes K, Szucs A, Vincze A. Transpancreatic sphincterotomy has a higher cannulation success rate than needle-knife precut papillotomy - a meta-analysis. Endoscopy. 2017 Sep;49(9):874-887. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-111717. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
PMID: 28609791RESULTMariani A, Di Leo M, Giardullo N, Giussani A, Marini M, Buffoli F, Cipolletta L, Radaelli F, Ravelli P, Lombardi G, D'Onofrio V, Macchiarelli R, Iiritano E, Le Grazie M, Pantaleo G, Testoni PA. Early precut sphincterotomy for difficult biliary access to reduce post-ERCP pancreatitis: a randomized trial. Endoscopy. 2016 Jun;48(6):530-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-102250. Epub 2016 Mar 18.
PMID: 26990509RESULT
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Patients are randomized into two groups at the time of providing informed consent by a 1:1 ratio, by opening a sealed envelope containing a noted marked with both groups.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Deputy Director of Division of Hepato-Gastroenterology, Clinical Associate Professor.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 17, 2025
First Posted
July 3, 2025
Study Start
December 1, 2021
Primary Completion
September 28, 2025
Study Completion
October 28, 2025
Last Updated
July 3, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared due to concerns regarding patient privacy and institutional policies. In addition, the scope of this single-center study does not include external data sharing in its original ethical approval or informed consent documentation.