NCT07047651

Brief Summary

The effectiveness and efficacy of the combination of pharmacotherapy with the two new recovery-oriented programs, RECOVERYTRSGR for patients with treatment- resistant schizophrenia and RECOVERYTRSBDGR for patients with treatment- resistant bipolar disorder.

Trial Health

75
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
84

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_4

Timeline
20mo left

Started Jun 2025

Typical duration for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress36%
Jun 2025Dec 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 11, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 4, 2025

Completed
28 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 2, 2025

Completed
2.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 20, 2027

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 20, 2027

Last Updated

May 1, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

2.5 years

First QC Date

April 11, 2025

Last Update Submit

April 30, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

RECOVERYTRSGRRECOVERYTRSBDGRTreatment resistant schizophreniaTreatment resistant bipolar disorderRecovery-oriented therapy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (90)

  • MCCB BACS symbol coding (for RECOVERYTRSGR)

    It measures speed of processing. Minimum 0, maximum 110, high scores better

    Pre-intervention

  • MCCB BACS symbol coding (for RECOVERYTRSGR)

    It measures speed of processing. Minimum 0, maximum 110, high scores better

    Immediately after the intervention

  • MCCB BACS symbol coding (for RECOVERYTRSGR)

    It measures speed of processing. Minimum 0, maximum 110, high scores better

    Follow-up up to 24 weeks

  • MCCB Wechsler memory scale-spatial span (for RECOVERYTRSGR)

    It measures non-verbal working memory. Minimum 0, maximum 32, high scores better, Summary of forward and backward total score.

    Pre-intervention

  • MCCB Wechsler memory scale-spatial span (for RECOVERYTRSGR)

    It measures non-verbal working memory. Minimum 0, maximum 32, high scores better. Summary of forward and backward total score

    Immediately after the intervention

  • MCCB Wechsler memory scale-spatial span (for RECOVERYTRSGR)

    It measures non-verbal working memory. Minimum 0, maximum 32, high scores better. Summary of forward and backward total score

    Follow-up up to 24 weeks

  • MCCB Neurospychological Assessment Battery (NAB) (for RECOVERYTRSGR)

    It measures reasoning and problem-solving. Minimum 0, maximum 26. high scores better

    Pre-intervention

  • MCCB Neurospychological Assessment Battery (NAB) (for RECOVERYTRSGR)

    It measures reasoning and problem-solving. Minimum 0, maximum 26. high scores better

    Immediately after the intervention

  • MCCB Neurospychological Assessment Battery (NAB) (for RECOVERYTRSGR)

    It measures reasoning and problem-solving. Minimum 0, maximum 26. high scores better

    Follow-up up to 24 weeks

  • MCCB Brief visuospatial memory test (for RECOVERYTRSGR)

    It measures visual memory. Sum of Trial 1, 2, 3. Minimum 0, maximum 12. high scores better.

    Pre-intervention

  • MCCB Brief visuospatial memory test (for RECOVERYTRSGR)

    It measures visual memory. Sum of Trial 1, 2, 3. Minimum 0, maximum 12. high scores better.

    Immediately after the intervention

  • MCCB Brief visuospatial memory test (for RECOVERYTRSGR)

    It measures visual memory. Sum of Trial 1, 2, 3. Minimum 0, maximum 12. high scores better.

    Follow-up up to 24 weeks

  • Social Perception Scale (SPS) Stimuli (for RECOVERYTRSGR)

    It measures social cognition. Minimum 0, maximum 67. high scores better.

    Pre-intervention

  • Social Perception Scale (SPS) Stimuli (for RECOVERYTRSGR)

    It measures social cognition. Minimum 0, maximum 67. high scores better.

    Immediately after the intervention

  • Social Perception Scale (SPS) Stimuli (for RECOVERYTRSGR)

    It measures social cognition. Minimum 0, maximum 67. high scores better.

    Follow-up up to 24 weeks

  • Social Perception Scale (SPS) Interpretation (for RECOVERYTRSGR)

    It measures social cognition. Minimum 0, maximum 12. high scores better.

    Pre-intervention

  • Social Perception Scale (SPS) Interpretation (for RECOVERYTRSGR)

    It measures social cognition. Minimum 0, maximum 12. high scores better.

    Immediately after the intervention

  • Social Perception Scale (SPS) Interpretation (for RECOVERYTRSGR)

    It measures social cognition. Minimum 0, maximum 12. high scores better.

    Follow-up up to 24 weeks

  • Social Perception Scale (SPS) Title (for RECOVERYTRSGR)

    It measures social cognition. Minimum 0, maximum 12. high scores better.

    Pre-intervention

  • Social Perception Scale (SPS) Title (for RECOVERYTRSGR)

    It measures social cognition. Minimum 0, maximum 12. high scores better.

    Immediately after the intervention

  • Social Perception Scale (SPS) Title (for RECOVERYTRSGR)

    It measures social cognition. Minimum 0, maximum 12. high scores better.

    Follow-up up to 24 weeks

  • The Greek verbal memory test (Kosmidou & Vlahou, 2010) (for RECOVERYTRSGR)

    It measures oral verbal memory. Semantic. Sum of the 3 categories divided to 3. Minimum 0, maximum 40. high scores better.

    Pre-intervention

  • The Greek verbal memory test (Kosmidou & Vlahou, 2010) (for RECOVERYTRSBDGR)

    It measures oral verbal memory. Semantic. Sum of the 3 categories divided to 3. Minimum 0, maximum 40. high scores better.

    Pre-intervention

  • The Greek verbal memory test (Kosmidou & Vlahou, 2010) (for RECOVERYTRSGR)

    It measures oral verbal memory. Semantic. Sum of the 3 categories divided to 3. Minimum 0, maximum 40. high scores better.

    Immediately after the intervention

  • The Greek verbal memory test (Kosmidou & Vlahou, 2010) (for RECOVERYTRSBDGR)

    It measures oral verbal memory. Semantic. Sum of the 3 categories divided to 3. Minimum 0, maximum 40. high scores better.

    Immediately after the intervention

  • The Greek verbal memory test (Kosmidou & Vlahou, 2010) (for RECOVERYTRSGR)

    It measures oral verbal memory. Semantic. Sum of the 3 categories divided to 3. Minimum 0, maximum 40. high scores better.

    Follow-up up to 24 weeks

  • The Greek verbal memory test (Kosmidou & Vlahou, 2010) (for RECOVERYTRSBDGR)

    It measures oral verbal memory. Semantic. Sum of the 3 categories divided to 3. Minimum 0, maximum 40. high scores better.

    Follow-up up to 24 weeks

  • The Greek verbal memory test (Kosmidou & Vlahou, 2010) (for RECOVERYTRSGR)

    It measures oral verbal memory. Phonological. Sum of the 3 categories divided to 3. Minimum 0, maximum 40. high scores better.

    Pre-intervention

  • The Greek verbal memory test (Kosmidou & Vlahou, 2010) (for RECOVERYTRSBDGR)

    It measures oral verbal memory. Phonological. Sum of the 3 categories divided to 3. Minimum 0, maximum 40. high scores better.

    Pre-intervention

  • The Greek verbal memory test (Kosmidou & Vlahou, 2010) (for RECOVERYTRSGR)

    It measures oral verbal memory. Phonological. Sum of the 3 categories divided to 3. Minimum 0, maximum 40. high scores better.

    Immediately after the intervention

  • The Greek verbal memory test (Kosmidou & Vlahou, 2010) (for RECOVERYTRSBDGR)

    It measures oral verbal memory. Phonological. Sum of the 3 categories divided to 3. Minimum 0, maximum 40. high scores better.

    Immediately after the intervention

  • The Greek verbal memory test (Kosmidou & Vlahou, 2010) (for RECOVERYTRSGR)

    It measures oral verbal memory. Phonological. Sum of the 3 categories divided to 3. Minimum 0, maximum 40. high scores better.

    Follow-up up to 24 weeks

  • The Greek verbal memory test (Kosmidou & Vlahou, 2010) (for RECOVERYTRSBDGR)

    It measures oral verbal memory. Phonological. Sum of the 3 categories divided to 3. Minimum 0, maximum 40. high scores better.

    Follow-up up to 24 weeks

  • The Greek verbal memory test (Kosmidou & Vlahou, 2010) (for RECOVERYTRSGR)

    It measures written verbal memory. Sum of the 2 tasks. Minimum 0, maximum as much as possible. high scores better.

    Pre-intervention

  • The Greek verbal memory test (Kosmidou & Vlahou, 2010) (for RECOVERYTRSBDGR)

    It measures written verbal memory. Sum of the 2 tasks. Minimum 0, maximum as much as possible. high scores better.

    Pre-intervention

  • The Greek verbal memory test (Kosmidou & Vlahou, 2010) (for RECOVERYTRSGR)

    It measures written verbal memory. Sum of the 2 tasks. Minimum 0, maximum as much as possible. high scores better.

    Immediately after the intervention

  • The Greek verbal memory test (Kosmidou & Vlahou, 2010) (for RECOVERYTRSBDGR)

    It measures written verbal memory. Sum of the 2 tasks. Minimum 0, maximum as much as possible. high scores better.

    Immediately after the intervention

  • The Greek verbal memory test (Kosmidou & Vlahou, 2010) (for RECOVERYTRSGR)

    It measures written verbal memory. Sum of the 2 tasks. Minimum 0, maximum as much as possible. high scores better.

    Follow-up up to 24 weeks

  • The Greek verbal memory test (Kosmidou & Vlahou, 2010) (for RECOVERYTRSBDGR)

    It measures written verbal memory. Sum of the 2 tasks. Minimum 0, maximum as much as possible. high scores better.

    Follow-up up to 24 weeks

  • PANNS total (for RECOVERYTRSGR)

    It measures positive, negative symptoms and general psychopathology. Minimum 31, maximum 210. Low scores better

    Pre-intervention

  • PANNS total (for RECOVERYTRSGR)

    It measures positive, negative symptoms and general psychopathology. Minimum 31, maximum 210. Low scores better

    Immediately after the intervention

  • PANNS total (for RECOVERYTRSGR)

    It measures positive, negative symptoms and general psychopathology. Minimum 31, maximum 210. Low scores better

    Follow-up up to 24 weeks

  • WHODAS total (for RECOVERYTRSGR)

    It measures functional outcome. Minimum 0, maximum 100. low scores better.

    Pre-intervention

  • WHODAS total (for RECOVERYTRSGR)

    It measures functional outcome. Minimum 0, maximum 100. low scores better.

    Immediately after the intervention

  • WHODAS total (for RECOVERYTRSGR)

    It measures functional outcome. Minimum 0, maximum 100. low scores better.

    Follow-up up to 24 weeks

  • RAS-DS total (for RECOVERYTRSGR)

    It measures recovery. Minimum 0, maximum 152. High scores better.

    Pre-intervention

  • RAS-DS total (for RECOVERYTRSGR)

    It measures recovery. Minimum 0, maximum 152. High scores better.

    Immediately after the intervention

  • RAS-DS total (for RECOVERYTRSGR)

    It measures recovery. Minimum 0, maximum 152. High scores better.

    Follow-up up to 24 weeks

  • The Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI) (for RECOVERYTRSGR)

    It measures severity of illness. Minimum 0, Maximum 7, low scores better.

    Pre-intervention

  • The Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI) (for RECOVERYTRSGR)

    It. measures severity of illness. Minimum 0, Maximum 7, low scores better.

    Immediately after the intervention

  • The Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI) (for RECOVERYTRSGR)

    It. measures severity of illness. Minimum 0, Maximum 7, low scores better.

    Follow-up up to 24 weeks

  • The Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI) (for RECOVERYTRSGR)

    It measures global improvement. Minimum 0, Maximum 7, low scores better.

    Pre-intervention

  • The Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI) (for RECOVERYTRSGR)

    It measures global improvement. Minimum 0, Maximum 7, low scores better.

    Immediately after the intervention

  • The Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI) (for RECOVERYTRSGR)

    It measures global improvement. Minimum 0, Maximum 7, low scores better.

    Follow-up up to 24 weeks

  • SRSDA (for RECOVERYTRSBDGR)

    It measures Depression. Minimum 0, maximum 14 or higher. Low scores better

    Pre-intervention

  • SRSDA (for RECOVERYTRSBDGR)

    It measures Depression. Minimum 0, maximum 14 or higher. Low scores better

    Immediately after the intervention

  • SRSDA (for RECOVERYTRSBDGR)

    It measures Depression. Minimum 0, maximum 14 or higher. Low scores better

    Follow-up up to 24 weeks

  • SRSDA (for RECOVERYTRSBDGR)

    It measures Anxiety. Minimum 0, maximum 10 or higher. Low scores better

    Pre-intervention

  • SRSDA (for RECOVERYTRSBDGR)

    It measures Anxiety. Minimum 0, maximum 10 or higher. Low scores better

    Immediately after the intervention

  • SRSDA (for RECOVERYTRSBDGR)

    It measures Anxiety. Minimum 0, maximum 10 or higher. Low scores better

    Follow-up up to 24 weeks

  • Hamilton Depression Scale (for RECOVERYTRSBDGR)

    It measures depression. Minimum 0, maximum 23. Low scores better.

    Pre-intervention

  • Hamilton Depression Scale (for RECOVERYTRSBDGR)

    It meaasures depression. Minimum 0, maximum 23. Low scores better.

    Immediately after the intervention

  • Hamilton Depression Scale (for RECOVERYTRSBDGR)

    It meaasures depression. Minimum 0, maximum 23. Low scores better.

    Follow-up up to 24 weeks

  • Montgomery and Asperg depression scale (for RECOVERYTRSBDGR)

    It measures depression. Minimum 0, maximum 60. Low scores better.

    Pre-intervention

  • Montgomery and Asperg depression scale (for RECOVERYTRSBDGR)

    It measures depression. Minimum 0, maximum 60. Low scores better.

    Immediately after the intervention

  • Montgomery and Asperg depression scale (for RECOVERYTRSBDGR)

    It measures depression. Minimum 0, maximum 60. Low scores better.

    Follow-up up to 24 weeks

  • The Altman self-rating scale (for RECOVERYTRSBDGR)

    It measures mania. Minimum 0, maximum 6 or higher. Low scores better.

    Pre-intervention

  • The Altman self-rating scale (for RECOVERYTRSBDGR)

    It measures mania. Minimum 0, maximum 6 or higher. Low scores better.

    Immediately after the intervention

  • The Altman self-rating scale (for RECOVERYTRSBDGR)

    It measures mania. Minimum 0, maximum 6 or higher. Low scores better.

    Follow-up up to 24 weeks

  • PSYRAT (for RECOVERYTRSBDGR)

    It measures psychotic symptoms. Hallucinations. Minimum 0, maximum 44. Low scores better.

    Pre-intervention

  • PSYRAT (for RECOVERYTRSBDGR)

    It measures psychotic symptoms. Hallucinations. Minimum 0, maximum 24. Low scores better.

    Immediately after the intervention

  • PSYRAT (for RECOVERYTRSBDGR)

    It measures psychotic symptoms. Hallucinations. Minimum 0, maximum 24. Low scores better.

    Follow-up up to 24 weeks

  • PSYRAT (for RECOVERYTRSBDGR)

    It measures psychotic symptoms. Delusions. Minimum 0, maximum 44. Low scores better.

    Pre-intervention

  • PSYRAT (for RECOVERYTRSBDGR)

    It measures psychotic symptoms. Delusions. Minimum 0, maximum 44. Low scores better.

    Immediately after the intervention

  • PSYRAT (for RECOVERYTRSBDGR)

    It measures psychotic symptoms. Delusions. Minimum 0, maximum 24. Low scores better.

    Follow-up up to 24 weeks

  • WHODAS total (for RECOVERYTRSBDGR)

    It measures functional outcome. Minimum 0, maximum 100. Low scores better.

    Pre-intervention

  • WHODAS total (for RECOVERYTRSBDGR)

    It measures functional outcome. Minimum 0, maximum 100. Low scores better.

    Immediately after the intervention

  • WHODAS total (for RECOVERYTRSBDGR)

    It measures functional outcome. Minimum 0, maximum 100. Low scores better.

    Follow-up up to 24 weeks

  • RAS-DS Total (for RECOVERYTRSBDGR)

    It measures recovery. Minimum 0, maximum 152. High scores better

    Pre-intervention

  • RAS-DS Total (for RECOVERYTRSBDGR)

    It measures recovery. Minimum 0, maximum 152. High scores better

    Immediately after the intervention

  • RAS-DS Total (for RECOVERYTRSBDGR)

    It measures recovery. Minimum 0, maximum 152. High scores better

    Follow-up up to 24 weeks

  • The Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI) (for RECOVERYTRSBDGR)

    It measures severity of illness. Minimum 0, Maximum 7, low scores better.

    Pre-intervention

  • The Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI) (for RECOVERYTRSBDGR)

    It measures severity of illness. Minimum 0, Maximum 7, low scores better.

    Immediately after the intervention

  • The Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI) (for RECOVERYTRSBDGR)

    It measures severity of illness. Minimum 0, Maximum 7, low scores better.

    Follow-up up to 24 weeks

  • The Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI) (for RECOVERYTRSBDGR)

    It measures global improvement. Minimum 0, Maximum 7, low scores better.

    Pre-intervention

  • The Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI) (for RECOVERYTRSBDGR)

    It measures global improvement. Minimum 0, Maximum 7, low scores better.

    Immediately after the intervention

  • The Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI) (for RECOVERYTRSBDGR)

    It measures global improvement. Minimum 0, Maximum 7, low scores better.

    Follow-up up to 24 weeks

  • The Young mania rating scale (for RECOVERYTRSBDGR)

    It measures mania. Minimum 0, maximum 60. Low scores better

    Pre-intervention

  • The Young mania rating scale (for RECOVERYTRSBDGR)

    It measures mania. Minimum 0, maximum 60. Low scores better

    Immediately after the intervention

  • The Young mania rating scale (for RECOVERYTRSBDGR)

    It measures mania. Minimum 0, maximum 60. Low scores better

    Follow-up up to 24 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • WAIS (for RECOVERYTRSGR)

    Pre-intervention

  • WAIS (for RECOVERYTRSBDGR)

    Pre-intervention

Study Arms (4)

Group A

EXPERIMENTAL

Pharmacotherapy and RECOVERYTRSGR 22 participants

Combination Product: Group A: (Clozapine, quietiapine, olanzapine, aripiprazole, zyprasidone, risperidone, asenapine, paliperidone, clopixol,anxiolytics: clonazepam, stedon, tavor antidepressants: seropram),

Group B

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Pharmacotherapy and TAU. 20 participants

Combination Product: Group B (Pharmacotherapy and TAU) (Clozapine, quietiapine, olanzapine, aripiprazole, zyprasidone, risperidone, asenapine, paliperidone, clopixol, clonazepam, stedon, tavor, antidepressants,

Group C

EXPERIMENTAL

Pharmacotherapy and RECOVERYTRSBDGR. 22 participants

Combination Product: Group C (Pharmacotherapy and Psychotherapy) Clozapine, quietiapine, olanzapine, aripiprazole, zyprasidone, risperidone, asenapine, paliperidone, clopixol, clonazepam, stedon, tavor, lithium, depakine

Group D

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Pharmacotherapy and TAU. 20 participants

Combination Product: Group D (Pharmacotherapy and TAU)Clozapine, quietiapine, olanzapine, aripiprazole, zyprasidone, risperidone, asenapine, paliperidone, clopixol, clonazepam, stedon, tavor, seropram, lithium, depakine)

Interventions

A combination of pharmacotherapy with RECOVERYTRSBDGR (antipsychotics, anxiolytics, antidepressants, mood stabilizers) for patients with treatment-resistant bipolar disorder. 140 sessions, 22 people

Group C

A combination of pharmacotherapy (antipsychotics, anxiolytics, antidepressants) with RECOVERYTRSGR (psychotherapy) for patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. 190 sessions. 22 patients

Group A

The combination of pharmacotherapy (antipsychotics, anxiolytics, antidepressants) and TAU (psychotherapy) for patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. 190 sessions. The control group of Group A 20 patients

Group B

A combination of pharmacotherapy (antipsychotics, anxiolytics, antidepressants, mood stabilizers) and TAU (psychotherapy). A control group to RECOVERYTRSBDGR. 140 sessions. 20 people

Group D

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • age 18-65
  • IQ ≥ 80
  • Diagnosis TRS.
  • age 18-65
  • IQ ≥ 80
  • Diagnosis TRSBD.

You may not qualify if:

  • Substance abuse and head injury. If substance abuse is successfully treated, the participant will be accepted into our program.
  • Relapse and hospitalization.
  • Substance abuse and head injuries. If substance abuse is successfully treated, the participant will be acknowledged into our program.
  • Relapse and hospitalization.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Private practice of Dr. S. Rakitzi and Dr. P. Georgila ILISION 34 15771 ATHENS GREECE

Athens, 15771, Greece

Location

Related Publications (21)

  • Altman EG, Hedeker D, Peterson JL, Davis JM. The Altman Self-Rating Mania Scale. Biol Psychiatry. 1997 Nov 15;42(10):948-55. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3223(96)00548-3.

    PMID: 9359982BACKGROUND
  • 2. Aster, M., Neubauer, M., & Horn R. (2006) Wechsler-Intelligenztest für Erwachsene WIE. Frankfurt: Harcourt Test Services.

    BACKGROUND
  • 3. Bech, P. (1993). Rating scales for Psychopathology, Health Status and Quality of Life. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer-Verlag.

    BACKGROUND
  • Busner J, Targum SD. The clinical global impressions scale: applying a research tool in clinical practice. Psychiatry (Edgmont). 2007 Jul;4(7):28-37.

    PMID: 20526405BACKGROUND
  • 5. Donias, S., Karastergiou, A., & Manos N. (1991). Standardization of the symptom checklist-90-R rating scale in a Greek population. Psychiatriki, 2(1), 42-48.

    BACKGROUND
  • Fountoulakis KN, Iacovides A, Kleanthous S, Samolis S, Gougoulias K, St Kaprinis G, Bech P. The Greek translation of the symptoms rating scale for depression and anxiety: preliminary results of the validation study. BMC Psychiatry. 2003 Dec 10;3:21. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-3-21.

    PMID: 14667249BACKGROUND
  • 7. Guy, W. (ed). (1976). ECDEU Assessment. Manual for Psychopharmacology. Rockville, MD: US Department of Heath, Education, and Welfare Public Health Service Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration, 1976.

    BACKGROUND
  • Haddock G, McCarron J, Tarrier N, Faragher EB. Scales to measure dimensions of hallucinations and delusions: the psychotic symptom rating scales (PSYRATS). Psychol Med. 1999 Jul;29(4):879-89. doi: 10.1017/s0033291799008661.

    PMID: 10473315BACKGROUND
  • 9. Hancock, N., Scanlan, J.N., Bundy, A.C., Honey, A. (2019). Recovery Assessment Scale -Domains & Stages (RAS-DS) Manual- Version 3. Sydney: University of Sydney.

    BACKGROUND
  • 10. Hancock, N., & the University of Sydney (2023). Rakitzi S. Katoudi S. Recovery Assessment Scale-Domains & Stages (RAS-DS). The Greek version.

    BACKGROUND
  • Kay SR, Fiszbein A, Opler LA. The positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 1987;13(2):261-76. doi: 10.1093/schbul/13.2.261.

    PMID: 3616518BACKGROUND
  • 12. Kosmidou, M., & Vlahou, Ch. (2010). The Greek verbal memory test. Athens: Parisianos.

    BACKGROUND
  • 13. Koumpouros, Y., Papageorgiou, E., & Sakellari E. et al. (2018). Adaptation and psychometric properties evaluation of the Greek version of WHODAS 2.0. Pilot application in Greek elderly population. Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, 18(1), 63-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10742-017-0176-x

    BACKGROUND
  • 14. Lykouras, L., Botsis, A., & Oulis P. (2005). The PANSS Scale. Athens: Scientific Publications.

    BACKGROUND
  • Montgomery SA, Asberg M. A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. Br J Psychiatry. 1979 Apr;134:382-9. doi: 10.1192/bjp.134.4.382.

    PMID: 444788BACKGROUND
  • 16. Nuechterlein, K.H., & Green, M.F. (2006). Matrics Consensus Cognitive Battery. MATRICS. Los Angeles: MATRICS Assessment Inc.

    BACKGROUND
  • 17. Rakitzi, S., & Georgila, P. (2024). Treatment resistant schizophrenia. Evidence-based pharmacotherapy, cognitive behavioral psychotherapy and rehabilitation. Springer.

    BACKGROUND
  • 18. Rakitzi, S., & Georgila, P. (2024b). Treatment resistant bipolar disorder. Evidence-based pharmacotherapy, cognitive behavioral psychotherapy and rehabilitation. Springer.

    BACKGROUND
  • Williams JB, Kobak KA. Development and reliability of a structured interview guide for the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (SIGMA). Br J Psychiatry. 2008 Jan;192(1):52-8. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.106.032532.

    PMID: 18174510BACKGROUND
  • 20. World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.

    BACKGROUND
  • Fuentes, I., Garcia, S., Ruiz, J.C., Soler, J., & Roder, V. (2007). Social perception scale in Schizophrenia. A pilot study. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological therapy, 7 (1), 1-12

    BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Schizophrenia, Treatment-Resistant

Interventions

ClozapineOlanzapineAripiprazoleRisperidoneasenapinePaliperidone PalmitateClopenthixolDrug TherapyClonazepamoxybutyninAntidepressive AgentsPsychotherapyLithiumValproic AcidCitalopram

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

SchizophreniaSchizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic DisordersMental Disorders

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

DibenzazepinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 3-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsBenzodiazepinesBenzazepinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 2-RingPiperazinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingQuinolonesQuinolinesPyrimidinonesPyrimidinesIsoxazolesAzolesThioxanthenesSulfur CompoundsOrganic ChemicalsXanthenesTherapeuticsBenzodiazepinonesPsychotropic DrugsCentral Nervous System AgentsTherapeutic UsesPharmacologic ActionsChemical Actions and UsesBehavioral Disciplines and ActivitiesMetals, AlkaliElementsInorganic ChemicalsMetals, LightMetalsPentanoic AcidsValeratesAcids, AcyclicCarboxylic AcidsFatty Acids, VolatileFatty AcidsLipidsPropylaminesAminesNitrilesBenzofurans

Study Officials

  • Dr. Stavroula Rakitzi, PhD

    Private Practice

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Dr. Polyxeni Georgila, M. D.

    Private Practice

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Pharmacotherapy and RECOVERYTRSGR (190 sessions) will be compared to treatment as usual (TAU) and pharmacotherapy (190 sessions) and Pharmacotherapy and RECOVERYTRSBDGR (140 sessions) will be compared also to TAU and pharmacotherapy (140 sessions).
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Director

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 11, 2025

First Posted

July 2, 2025

Study Start

June 4, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 20, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 20, 2027

Last Updated

May 1, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

This is the first study regarding the efficacy and effectiveness of RECOVERYTRSGR, and RECOVERYTRSBDGR, which are developed by us.

Locations