Evaluating AI and Human Expert Decisions in Colorectal Cancer
Comparison of Large Language Models and Expert Multidisciplinary Team Decisions in Colorectal Cancer
1 other identifier
observational
1,500
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this observational study is to evaluate the decision-making consistency between large language models (LLMs) and expert multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) in adult patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer who underwent MDT consultation between January 2023 and December 2024. The main questions it aims to answer are: How consistent are the treatment decisions generated by LLMs compared to actual MDT decisions? Do different LLMs (e.g., ChatGPT, DeepSeek) show varying levels of agreement with expert recommendations? What clinical factors contribute to differences between AI-generated and human expert decisions? Researchers will compare the AI-generated treatment recommendations with real-world MDT decisions using anonymized patient records to see if LLMs can reliably support clinical decision-making in oncology. Participants will: Have their de-identified clinical data (e.g., imaging, pathology, MDT notes) processed through several LLMs Not be contacted or receive any interventions, as this is a retrospective study using existing clinical records only.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jul 2025
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 22, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2026
CompletedJuly 1, 2025
June 1, 2025
11 months
June 22, 2025
June 22, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Agreement Between AI-Generated and MDT Treatment Decisions
Description: The primary outcome is the consistency between treatment recommendations generated by large language models (LLMs) and those made by expert multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) for colorectal cancer cases. Consistency will be quantified using Cohen's Kappa coefficient. Higher Kappa values indicate stronger agreement
January 1, 2023 to December 31, 2024 (based on MDT consultation date)
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Comparison of Agreement Across Different AI Models
January 1, 2023 to December 31, 2024
Output Stability of AI Models on Repeated InputsDescription
January 1, 2023 to December 31, 2024
Identification of Clinical Factors Associated With Decision Discordance
January 1, 2023 to December 31, 2024
Interventions
Leveraging large language models (LLMs) to Generate Multidisciplinary Team (MDT) Treatment Recommendations
Eligibility Criteria
This study includes adult patients with histologically confirmed colorectal cancer who received multidisciplinary team (MDT) consultation at Peking University Cancer Hospital between January 1, 2023 and December 31, 2024. All clinical data were retrospectively collected from electronic medical records, including imaging, pathology, and MDT treatment recommendations. Patients represent a real-world tertiary cancer center population and were not selected based on treatment response or prognosis.
You may qualify if:
- Patients with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of colorectal cancer
- Patients who received multidisciplinary team (MDT) consultation at Peking University Cancer Hospital between January 1, 2023 and December 31, 2024
- Availability of complete clinical records, including(MDT consultation notes, CT or MRI imaging reports, Pathology reports, Outpatient or inpatient medical summaries)
You may not qualify if:
- Incomplete or missing medical records related to MDT decision-making
- MDT consultations conducted for non-oncologic purposes (e.g., hernia evaluation, stoma planning)
- Missing critical clinical data such as imaging or pathology reports
- Duplicate or conflicting records that prevent reliable data analysis
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Peking University Cancer Hospital
Beijing, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 22, 2025
First Posted
July 1, 2025
Study Start
July 1, 2025
Primary Completion
June 1, 2026
Study Completion
June 1, 2026
Last Updated
July 1, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share