Application of Low-dose Muscle Relaxants in Bronchoscopic Interventional Procedures
Effects of Low-Dose Neuromuscular Blocking Agents on Perioperative Complications During Bronchoscopic Procedures
1 other identifier
interventional
153
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this clinical trial is to observe the use of low-dose muscle relaxants in bronchoscopy intervention surgeries, compared with no muscle relaxants, in terms of the satisfaction of tracheal tube insertion after anesthesia induction, the incidence of laryngospasm, the grading of intraoperative cough and movement, and the recovery of patients after surgery. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- How safe and feasible is the use of low-dose muscle relaxants in bronchoscopy intervention surgeries?
- Is the muscle relaxant regimen better than the no-muscle-relaxant regimen? Participants will:
- During anesthesia induction, the experimental group will use low-dose muscle relaxants for anesthesia, while the control group will not use muscle relaxants for anesthesia.
- Record the satisfaction of mask ventilation and the incidence of laryngospasm.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Mar 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 17, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 12, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 25, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 31, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 31, 2025
CompletedMarch 3, 2026
February 1, 2026
5 months
May 12, 2025
February 28, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The incidence rate of laryngeal spasm
Observe the degree of glottic opening (grade I: glottis opens well; grade II: glottis opens \>⅔, mild laryngospasm; grade III: glottis opens ⅓-⅔, moderate laryngospasm; grade IV: glottis opens ≤⅓ or is completely closed, severe laryngospasm).Grades III and IV were defined as laryngospasm.
At the beginning of the operation
Secondary Outcomes (39)
The severity of postoperative sore throat
When the patient regained consciousness (assessed up to 30 minutes after surgery)
Dysphagia
When the patient regained consciousness (assessed up to 30 minutes after surgery)
The incidence of oxygen desaturation (SpO₂ < 92%) during mask ventilation
during anesthesia induction
Grading of body movement during bronchoscope insertion
At the beginning of the operation
Grading of chest wall rigidity
During the process of anesthesia induction
- +34 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
normal saline
PLACEBO COMPARATORDuring the induction of anesthesia, rocuronium is not used for anesthesia.
rocuronium bromide
EXPERIMENTALUsing rocuronium for anesthesia during the induction phase of anesthesia.
Interventions
During anesthesia induction, an equal volume of normal saline was used instead of rocuronium for anesthesia.
Lidocaine was administered at a dose of 0.5mg/kg for the induction of anesthesia.
Remimazolam was administered at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg for the induction of anesthesia.
Remifentanil was administered at a dose of 3 micrograms per kilogram for the induction of anesthesia.
Rocuronium was administered at a dose of 0.15mg/kg for the induction of anesthesia.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients undergoing elective electronic bronchoscopic interventional surgery;
- Age 18 years or older;
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-III;
- The duration of bronchoscopic surgery \>=20min;
- Through pre-anesthesia assessment, the patient/family member has informed consent and signed the consent form;
- The general clinical information of the patient is complete.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with predictable difficult airway;
- Small mouth opening (\<2 transverse fingers);
- Combined with severe cardiovascular disease, abnormal liver and kidney function;
- Morbidly obese patients with body mass index (BMI) greater than 35kg/m\^2;
- Has a history of gastroesophageal reflux disease.
- High risk of reflux aspiration;
- Those who have a history of abnormal surgical anesthesia recovery in the past;
- Patients with mental illness and previous allergies to conventional anesthetic drugs.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University
Harbin, Heilongjiang, 150001, China
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
SHI Jinghui SHI
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Graduate student
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 12, 2025
First Posted
June 25, 2025
Study Start
March 17, 2025
Primary Completion
July 31, 2025
Study Completion
July 31, 2025
Last Updated
March 3, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR
The original data sharing platform (IPD sharing platform) of ResMan, a clinical trial registration center of China, on June 30, 2028.