Reducing Crises and Suicide Within the Idaho Army National Guard
1 other identifier
interventional
450
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Military suicide is an ongoing public health concern, particularly within the Army National Guard (ARNG), with longstanding effects on fellow soldiers, family, and friends. The straddling of military and civilian worlds for ARNG can worsen risk factors for suicide, including increased social isolation, disruption to family life, and employment difficulties. One promising framework that addresses both unit cohesion and social support is the First Line Leaders (FLL) program, recently designated by ARNG for nation-wide dissemination. The program is centered on enhancing the relationship between junior enlisted soldiers (JES) and their assigned non-commissioned officer (NCO). The Investigators propose to study an augmented FLL program that includes templated guides developed in collaboration with Idaho ARNG stakeholders. The guides, referred to as TAP (Total Health Action Plan), were adapted from two empirically based interventions, Crisis Response Planning and Problem-Solving Therapy, and consist of prompts for open communication and effective engagement and guidelines for responding to impending or current behavioral distress. Given their elevated suicide risk, the Idaho ARNG is a crucial setting to develop this upstream intervention. In this study, the Investigators propose to compare the augmented FLL + TAP program to FLL only, and training as usual (n= 50 NCOs and 100 JES per group) with quarterly assessments for up to one year. The Investigators will examine a random selection of deidentified counseling templates to examine the type and frequency of counseling sessions involving acute crisis and behavioral health difficulties, and online ratings from a random selection of JES using validated instruments to assess upstream indicators of behavioral distress and suicide risk and resilience. The Investigators will also conduct qualitative interviews with a random selection of 20% of the NCOs (n = 30) and JES (n = 60) enrolled in the project to provide personalized perspectives of program experiences. The Investigators propose three aims to guide this research. (1) Collaborate with Idaho ARNG stakeholders to integrate TAP into FLL programming via: a) development and refinement of TAP training materials, b) building templated counseling statements that align with FLL and TAP, and c) education of Idaho ARNG training cadre in the delivery of TAP. (2) Evaluate fidelity, feasibility, and acceptability of FLL and FLL + TAP through a mixed methods approach of qualitative interviews with FLLs and JESs and evaluation of data from templated counseling sessions. (3) Examine the impact of FLL+TAP versus FLL versus training as usual on unit morale, cohesion, and general functioning.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2026
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 27, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 24, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2026
ExpectedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2028
Study Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2028
April 14, 2026
April 1, 2026
1.9 years
May 27, 2025
April 9, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Mean change in Fidelity to TAP.
Fidelity to TAP will be assessed by examining counseling statements where an intervention was completed on the templated counseling statement forms generated by our Stakeholder Advisory Board (SAB) using a Likert-type scale (e.g., 1 = poor fidelity, 5 = excellent fidelity). The total range of possible scores is from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating better fidelity.
Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, and, Month 12.
Estimate of TAP usage at Follow-Up Assessments
Participants will be asked to complete a survey item assessing how many times they used a TAP during the 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-month follow-up visits. Response options will range from 0 to 99. The higher the score, the more TAPs the participant estimates they used during the given assessment period.
Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, and Month 12
Mean satisfaction with TAP while in the FLL training program
Participants will be asked to complete a survey called Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ). CSQ items are rated on a Likert-type scale that ranges from 0 to 4, with the higher total score indicating greater satisfaction with the intervention.
Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, and, Month 12
Study Arms (3)
FLL + TAP
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis will be a 1-day initial training that incorporates 12 leadership meetings, delivered during monthly drill weekends, and the FLLs will discuss program feasibility and acceptability with the program leadership. In addition to the standard FLL training, this group will learn about the Total Health Action Plan (TAP) and how to deploy it with their soldiers. The Investigators will measure fidelity of TAP delivery, soldier engagement and satisfaction rates, and whether NCOs are more responsive to soldiers reporting problems.
FLL
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis is the existing 1-day initial training that incorporates 12 leadership meetings, delivered during monthly drill weekends currently being delivered by the Idaho Army National Guard. FLLs will discuss program feasibility and acceptability with the program leadership.
No FLL
NO INTERVENTIONParticipants assigned to this condition will receive training as usual and have not been assigned FLL training by the Idaho Army National Guard.
Interventions
The Investigators are developing training programs for soldiers and leaders to enhance their communication skills, problem-solving abilities, and approachability. They will be randomized to one of three different groups.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Enlistment or commission in the Idaho ARNG at the time of enrollment
- Age 18 or greater
- Ability to complete all study questionnaires and interview procedures
- Has at least one year remaining on National Guard contract
You may not qualify if:
- \- Less than one year remaining on their contract with the National Guard
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Rochesterlead
- Idaho Army National Guardcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Idaho Army National Guard
Boise, Idaho, 83716, United States
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Todd Bishop, PhD
University of Rochester
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor- Department of Psychiatry
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 27, 2025
First Posted
June 24, 2025
Study Start (Estimated)
June 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
May 1, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
May 1, 2028
Last Updated
April 14, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share