Hydrotherapy in Labor: Outcomes for Pain, Birth, and Breastfeeding
HYDROTHERAPY
The Effect of Hydrotherapy During Labor on Labor Pain, Duration of Labor, Birth Affectivity, and Breastfeeding
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Warm showers are increasingly gaining attention for their positive impact on labor, yet studies on this topic in Turkey remain limited. No previous research has simultaneously evaluated the effects of warm showers on labor pain, duration, emotional state, and breastfeeding. As a simple, economical, accessible, and side-effect-free method, warm showers represent a practical and safe non-pharmacological option for pain relief and comfort during labor. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of hydrotherapy on labor pain, duration, breastfeeding, and emotional experience during childbirth.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable pregnancy
Started Jul 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable pregnancy
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 3, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 22, 2025
CompletedJuly 1, 2025
June 1, 2025
6 months
June 3, 2025
June 26, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
The VAS is used to assess the pain felt. On the VAS, the patient marks the location of their pain on a ruler. This ruler is 10 cm long. One end of the ruler indicates no pain, and the other end indicates the most unbearable pain. The use of this scale must be explained very clearly to the pregnant woman. The pregnant woman is told that there are two endpoints on the ruler and that she should mark the point between these two endpoints that best represents the intensity of her pain. The distance between the "no pain" point and the point marked by the pregnant woman is measured in centimeters using the ruler and recorded. This determines the pregnant woman's pain level.
First time: Latent phase of labor, Second time: Second stage of labor (the stage in which the baby is born), Third time: Third stage of labor (the stage in which the placenta is born), Forth time: Second hour after birth
Breastfeeding Scoring System (LATCH)
The LATCH scale is a tool used to assess mothers' breastfeeding behaviors and skills. Developed by Jensen et al. in 1994, it evaluates five key areas: L (Latch onto the breast), A (Audible swallowing), T (Type of nipple), C (Comfort of breast/nipple), and H (Hold/positioning). Each criterion is scored 0 to 2 points, with a total score ranging from 0 to 10. Higher scores reflect more effective breastfeeding, while lower scores indicate potential difficulties. The scale's reliability and validity for the Turkish population were confirmed by Koyun (2001) and Okumuş and Yenal (2003). Widely used by healthcare professionals, the LATCH scale helps identify breastfeeding challenges early and supports mothers through education and intervention, promoting better breastfeeding outcomes and bonding.
Within the first two hours after birth
Birth Emotion Scale (BES)
The Birth Emotion Scale (BES), developed by Hodnett in 1987, measures women's emotional experiences during childbirth. Gençalp validated and tested its reliability for the Turkish population in 1998. The scale contains 28 items scored on a 5-point Likert scale with options: "constantly," "frequently," "occasionally," "very rarely," and "never," coded from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate more positive emotions during birth, while lower scores reflect negative emotions. Total scores range from 40 to 140. The Turkish version showed high internal consistency with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.87. The BES is widely used in research and clinical settings to assess psychological responses to childbirth and guide supportive care.
Within the first two hours after birth
Labor Monitoring Form
To determine labor stage durations in pregnant women, researchers recorded key time points during labor and delivery. These included hospital arrival, and transitions between labor stages: latent, active, transition phases, birth, placenta delivery, and transfer to the postpartum ward. Timing was measured in minutes for accuracy. The latent phase involves mild contractions and cervical dilation up to 4 cm. The active phase features stronger contractions and dilation from 4 to 7 cm. The transition phase completes dilation to 10 cm. Measuring these stages, along with placenta delivery and postpartum transfer, provides valuable data to assess labor progress, detect abnormalities, and evaluate interventions. This detailed timing supports improved obstetric care tailored to each woman's needs.
First time: Latent phase of labor, Second time: Second stage of labor (the stage in which the baby is born), Third time: Third stage of labor (the stage in which the placenta is born), Forth time: Second hour after birth
Study Arms (2)
HYDROTHERAPY Group
EXPERIMENTALPregnant women who met the inclusion criteria and agreed to participate in the intervention group received a warm shower once cervical dilation reached 5 cm. Based on their preference, participants either stood or sat during the 30-minute shower. After random assignment, the participants in the intervention group completed the "Informed Consent Form," "Personal Information Form," and the "Visual Analog Scale (VAS)" upon admission to the delivery room. During the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th stages of labor, the "Labor Monitoring Form" was used, and the VAS was repeated immediately after the intervention, and again at 30 and 60 minutes. Breastfeeding status was assessed using the LATCH scale within the first two hours after birth, and emotional responses to birth were evaluated using the Labor Affect Scale.
Control group
NO INTERVENTIONIn the control group, routine hospital procedures were followed, including admission, history-taking, informed consent, recording of vital signs, and connecting the mother to the non-stress test (NST) monitor. No additional intervention was administered. After random assignment, control group participants also completed the "Informed Consent Form," "Personal Information Form," and "Visual Analog Scale" at admission. The "Labor and Postpartum Monitoring Form" was used during the 1st through 4th stages of labor, and the VAS was repeated at 30 and 60 minutes after entering the active phase. Within the first two hours postpartum, breastfeeding was evaluated using the LATCH scale, and emotional responses to birth were assessed using the Labor Affect Scale.
Interventions
Pregnant women who met the inclusion criteria and agreed to participate in the intervention group received a warm shower once cervical dilation reached 5 cm. Based on their preference, participants either stood or sat during the 30-minute shower.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Primiparous women who were expected to give birth vaginally
- Women who became pregnant spontaneously
- Women who were in the latent phase of labor upon admission
- Women who were not given oxytocin
- Women who were at term (38-42 weeks of gestation)
- Women who had a single healthy fetus in the vertex position
- Women who did not have any risk factors (such as preeclampsia, eclampsia, placenta previa, or placental abruption).
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant women with any complications that could cause dystocia during labor (such as contraction abnormalities birth objects, birth canal dystocia, maternal psychological dystocia)
- Who are unable to move
- Who cannot speak, read, or understand Turkish
- Who have communication problems.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Selcuk Universitylead
- Health Institutes of Turkeycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Mardin Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi
Mardin, Midyat, 47100, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (6)
Thomson G, Feeley C, Moran VH, Downe S, Oladapo OT. Women's experiences of pharmacological and non-pharmacological pain relief methods for labour and childbirth: a qualitative systematic review. Reprod Health. 2019 May 30;16(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0735-4.
PMID: 31146759BACKGROUNDPrice DD, McGrath PA, Rafii A, Buckingham B. The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain. Pain. 1983 Sep;17(1):45-56. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(83)90126-4.
PMID: 6226917BACKGROUNDMallen-Perez L, Roe-Justiniano MT, Colome Ochoa N, Ferre Colomat A, Palacio M, Terre-Rull C. Use of hydrotherapy during labour: Assessment of pain, use of analgesia and neonatal safety. Enferm Clin (Engl Ed). 2018 Sep-Oct;28(5):309-315. doi: 10.1016/j.enfcli.2017.10.004. Epub 2017 Nov 24. English, Spanish.
PMID: 29239794BACKGROUNDM. (2018). "Comparing the effects of hot shower and intravenous injection of hyoscine on the pain intensity and duration of active phase of labour in nulliparous women". Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 12(8), QC07-QC11.
BACKGROUNDHenrique AJ, Gabrielloni MC, Rodney P, Barbieri M. Non-pharmacological interventions during childbirth for pain relief, anxiety, and neuroendocrine stress parameters: A randomized controlled trial. Int J Nurs Pract. 2018 Jun;24(3):e12642. doi: 10.1111/ijn.12642. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
PMID: 29512230BACKGROUNDACOG Committee Opinion No. 766: Approaches to Limit Intervention During Labor and Birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Feb;133(2):e164-e173. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003074.
PMID: 30575638BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Hacer Alan Dikmen, Assoc. Prof.
Selcuk Uni̇versi̇ty
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- To prevent bias in the study sample, inclusion, exclusion, and withdrawal criteria were established. The intervention was performed solely by the researcher, therefore performance bias could not be prevented. Group assignments were done using random numbers generated by random.org, placed in opaque sealed envelopes, and assigned by an independent person not involved in the study. This ensured that participants were blinded to their group allocation. All data were collected by the researcher, who was aware of the group assignments; thus, measurement bias could not be prevented. However, data analyses were conducted by an independent statistician not involved in the research process, preventing statistical bias.
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assoc. Prof.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 3, 2025
First Posted
June 22, 2025
Study Start
July 1, 2024
Primary Completion
January 1, 2025
Study Completion
January 1, 2025
Last Updated
July 1, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share