Enhancing Mammography Programs for Outreach, Wellness, Education, and Resources (EMPOWER) in Underserved Populations Study
EMPOWER
2 other identifiers
interventional
2,700
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study is investigating the feasibility of a digital tool called a chatbot for providing educational information about mammography through a tablet, computer, or phone. This study will recruit participants who recently had a mammogram with the University of Utah. Based on their mammography results, women will be placed into two cohorts using their BI-RADS category. Once mammogram results are available, patients will be randomized 1:1 to either usual care or usual care with chatbot. This study will randomly invite participants from four groups for focus group discussions (FGDs) based on their mammogram results and adherence to screening recommendations
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable breast-cancer
Started Nov 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 11, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 19, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 19, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2028
November 21, 2025
November 1, 2025
2.3 years
June 11, 2025
November 20, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Screening Adherence
This outcome measure will test the addition of virtual navigation to usual processes of care to increase screening adherence for underserved women undergoing mobile mammography who have an abnormal breast cancer screening exam. Screening adherence will be measured as a two-point survey item (Yes/No). This outcome measure will report the proportion of participants who self-reported screening adherence.
up to 24 months from initiation of study intervention
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Receipt of follow-up testing
up to 12 months from initiation of study intervention
Receipt of episode completion
up to 12 months from initiation of study intervention
Study Arms (2)
Usual Care
NO INTERVENTIONUsual Care: This will include participants randomized to usual care.
Chatbot
EXPERIMENTALChatbot: This will include participants randomized to usual care with the Chatbot.
Interventions
The Chatbot used in this study will be used after mammography to facilitate follow-up, answer patient questions, and provide information.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult (equal to or above 18 years old)
- English or Spanish speaking
- Visit a mammography program for routine screening.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who are currently in treatment for breast cancer
- Patients who are not of 18 years of age.
- Patients who don't speak English or Spanish
- Men
- Cognitive limitations that impede informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Utahlead
- American Cancer Society, Inc.collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Huntsman Cancer Institute/ University of Utah
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84108, United States
Related Publications (15)
Cancer Stat Facts: Female Breast Cancer. https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/breast.html. Accessed Oct 11, 2021.
BACKGROUNDAmerican Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures for Hispancis/Latinos 2018-2020. Atlanta: American Cancer Society, Inc.;2018.
BACKGROUNDDeath Rates for Selected Cancers by Race and Ethnicity, US, 2010-2014. 2016; https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/annual-cancer-facts-and-figures/2017/death-rates-for-selected-cancers-by-race-and-ethnicity-us-2010-2014.pdf. Accessed Oct 11, 2021.
BACKGROUNDHenry KA, Sherman R, Farber S, Cockburn M, Goldberg DW, Stroup AM. The joint effects of census tract poverty and geographic access on late-stage breast cancer diagnosis in 10 US States. Health Place. 2013 May;21:110-21. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2013.01.007. Epub 2013 Mar 1.
PMID: 23454732BACKGROUNDDeSantis CE, Ma J, Goding Sauer A, Newman LA, Jemal A. Breast cancer statistics, 2017, racial disparity in mortality by state. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 Nov;67(6):439-448. doi: 10.3322/caac.21412. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
PMID: 28972651BACKGROUNDDoescher MP, Jackson JE. Trends in cervical and breast cancer screening practices among women in rural and urban areas of the United States. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2009 May-Jun;15(3):200-9. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3181a117da.
PMID: 19363399BACKGROUNDRoche LM, Niu X, Stroup AM, Henry KA. Disparities in Female Breast Cancer Stage at Diagnosis in New Jersey: A Spatial-Temporal Analysis. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2017 Sep/Oct;23(5):477-486. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000524.
PMID: 28430705BACKGROUNDWilliams F, Jeanetta S, O'Brien DJ, Fresen JL. Rural-urban difference in female breast cancer diagnosis in Missouri. Rural Remote Health. 2015 Jul-Sep;15(3):3063. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
PMID: 26223824BACKGROUNDBennett KJ, Pumkam C, Bellinger JD, Probst JC. Cancer screening delivery in persistent poverty rural counties. J Prim Care Community Health. 2011 Oct 1;2(4):240-9. doi: 10.1177/2150131911406123. Epub 2011 May 17.
PMID: 23804842BACKGROUNDBennett KJ, Probst JC, Bellinger JD. Receipt of cancer screening services: surprising results for some rural minorities. J Rural Health. 2012 Jan;28(1):63-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2011.00365.x. Epub 2011 Mar 11.
PMID: 22236316BACKGROUNDCoughlin SS, Leadbetter S, Richards T, Sabatino SA. Contextual analysis of breast and cervical cancer screening and factors associated with health care access among United States women, 2002. Soc Sci Med. 2008 Jan;66(2):260-75. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.09.009. Epub 2007 Nov 19.
PMID: 18022299BACKGROUNDHorner-Johnson W, Dobbertin K, Iezzoni LI. Disparities in receipt of breast and cervical cancer screening for rural women age 18 to 64 with disabilities. Womens Health Issues. 2015 May-Jun;25(3):246-53. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2015.02.004. Epub 2015 Apr 9.
PMID: 25864023BACKGROUNDLeung J, McKenzie S, Martin J, McLaughlin D. Effect of rurality on screening for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing mammography. Rural Remote Health. 2014;14(2):2730. Epub 2014 Jun 23.
PMID: 24953122BACKGROUNDIncidence Rates for Utah by County Breast (Late Stage), 2014-2018, All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages. https://statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov/map/map.withimage.php?49&county&001&055211&00&2&11&0&1&5&0#results. Accessed Oct 11, 2021.
BACKGROUNDGuillaume E, Launay L, Dejardin O, Bouvier V, Guittet L, Dean P, Notari A, De Mil R, Launoy G. Could mobile mammography reduce social and geographic inequalities in breast cancer screening participation? Prev Med. 2017 Jul;100:84-88. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.04.006. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
PMID: 28408217BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 11, 2025
First Posted
June 19, 2025
Study Start
November 19, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
March 1, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2028
Last Updated
November 21, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share