Evaluation of Treosulfan Versus Melphalan Conditioning Followed by PTCy in Patients With AML and MDS Undergoing Allogeneic Transplantation
RELEVANT
Randomized Evaluation of Treosulfan Versus Melphalan Conditioning Followed by PTCy in Patients With AML and MDS Undergoing Allogeneic Transplantation
1 other identifier
interventional
220
1 country
4
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness and tolerability of two conditioning chemotherapies prior to allogeneic stem cell transplantation. The following will also be investigated:
- Survival
- Remission and Relapse rate
- Engraftment or graft failure
- Graft versus Host Disease (GvHD)
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Sep 2025
Typical duration for phase_2
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 10, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 18, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2028
September 3, 2025
September 1, 2025
3.3 years
June 10, 2025
September 2, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
overall survival (OS)
2 years after randomization
Secondary Outcomes (7)
non-relapsed mortality (NRM)
2 years after randomization
relapse-free survival (RFS)
2 years after randomization
-Cumulative incidences of acute and chronic GvHD
2 years after randomization
Rates of AEs/SAEs/AESI
56 days after allogeneic stem cell transplantation
-Cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR)
2 years after randomization
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Treo - Arm
EXPERIMENTALTreo d-4 - d-2 + Flud d-6 till d-2
MEL - Arm
ACTIVE COMPARATORMel d-2 + Flud d-6 till d-2
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Informed consent signed by the patient capable of giving
- Patient scheduled for allogeneic transplantation within the next 3 weeks
- Age ≥ 18 years
- AML or MDS according to WHO with indication for allogeneic HCT:
- AML in first or second complete remission (CR) or complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi/CRh) or morphologic leukemia-free state (MLFS)
- MDS according to WHO
- Increased risk for treatment-related toxicity by myeloablative conditioning according to at least one of the following criteria:
- Patients aged ≥ 50 years at transplant and/or
- HCT-CI \> 2 and/or
- AML or MDS scheduled for 2nd allogeneic HCT from different donor with minimum of 12 months after 1st allogeneic HCT
- Availability of a suitable donor:
- Matched sibling donor (MSD) or
- matched unrelated donor (MUD, 10/10 HLA) or
- mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD, single allele or antigen mismatch at HLA-A, -B, -C, or -DRB1 and no concurrent -DQB1 mismatch (9/10) shown by confirmatory typing) or
- haploidentical family donor
- +3 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia with t(15;17)(q22;q12)
- Patients with graft failure after previous allogeneic HCT
- Patients with scheduled 2nd allogeneic HCT within 12 months after 1st allogeneic HCT
- Pretreatment with either melphalan or treosulfan within the last 12 months prior to randomization
- Planned TBI as part of conditioning
- Severe organ dysfunction defined by either one of the following criteria:
- Serum bilirubin \> 1.5 × ULN (if not considered Gilbert-syndrome) or
- ALAT or ASAT \> 5 × ULN
- Uncontrolled infection at the time of randomization.
- Active viral hepatitis unless serology demonstrates clearance of infection. Occult or prior hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, defined as negative hepatitis B surface antigen and positive total hepatitis core antibodies, may be included if HBV DNA is undetectable, provided that patients are willing to undergo monthly DNA testing. Patients who have protective titers of hepatitis B surface antibody after vaccination or prior cured hepatitis B are eligible. Patients for hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody are eligible provided PCR if negative for HCV RNA.
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Technische Universität Dresdenlead
- medac GmbHcollaborator
Study Sites (4)
Medizinische Fakultät der TU Dresden, Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I
Dresden, Germany
Universitätsmedizin Halle (Saale)
Halle, Germany
Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel
Kiel, Germany
Universitätsklinikum Münster, Medizinische Klinik A, KMT-Zentrum
Münster, Germany
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 10, 2025
First Posted
June 18, 2025
Study Start
September 1, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2028
Last Updated
September 3, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09