Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Ultrasonic Activated Irrigation Versus Non Activated Irrigation in Pulpectomy of Necrotic Primary Molars : A Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Canal Irrigation Using Ultrasonically Activated vs. Non-Activated Irrigants in Pulpectomy of Necrotic Primary Molars: A Randomized Clinical Trial" This study aims to compare the effectiveness of using ultrasonically activated irrigant versus non-activated irrigant in terms of clinical and radiographic success rates in the pulpectomy of necrotic primary molars, through a randomized clinical trial.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 7, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 17, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2026
June 17, 2025
June 1, 2025
1.2 years
June 7, 2025
June 13, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Post operative pain
Post operative pain assessments will be clinically , binary yes or no oral from patients word
6 months
Soft tissue pathology
This outcome will be measured clinically , binary yes or no by visual inspection
6 months
Pain on percussion
Will measured clinically , binary yes or no using back of mirror for percussion assessment
6 months
Pathological mobility
Will be assessed clinically , binary by yes or no using back of mirror and finger of one hand to check mobility
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Furcation or periapical pathology
6 months
External or internal root resorption
6 months
Study Arms (4)
Intervention group 1
EXPERIMENTALUltrasonic activated sodium hypochlorite
Intervention group 2
EXPERIMENTALUltrasonic activated saline
Intervention group 3
EXPERIMENTALSodium hypochlorite
Control group 4
ACTIVE COMPARATORSaline
Interventions
Using ultrasonic-activated sodium hypochlorite in the canals of primary molars can significantly enhance root canal disinfection by improving the irrigant's penetration and effectiveness. Primary molars often have complex and irregular canal anatomies, which can limit the reach of traditional irrigation methods. Ultrasonic activation creates acoustic streaming and cavitation effects, allowing sodium hypochlorite to better dissolve organic tissue and disrupt bacterial biofilms, especially in hard-to-reach areas. This leads to more thorough cleaning, reduced microbial load, and potentially better clinical outcomes in pediatric endodontics
using ultrasonic-activated saline within the canals of primary teeth lies in its ability to enhance mechanical debridement and improve irrigation effectiveness without the risks associated with stronger chemical agents. Although saline lacks inherent antimicrobial properties, ultrasonic activation generates acoustic streaming and cavitation, which help dislodge debris, disrupt biofilms, and clean intricate canal anatomy more efficiently than passive irrigation. This makes it a safer alternative in pediatric patients, minimizing the risk of cytotoxic effects or damage to developing permanent tooth buds while still improving cleaning outcomes.
using sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) within the canals of primary molars is its excellent antimicrobial and tissue-dissolving properties, which are essential for effective root canal disinfection. Primary molars often have complex and irregular canal systems that harbor bacteria and necrotic tissue. Sodium hypochlorite not only helps eliminate a broad spectrum of microorganisms but also dissolves organic debris, improving canal cleanliness and reducing the risk of post-treatment infection. When used in appropriate concentrations, it can significantly enhance the success of pulpectomy procedures in pediatric patients while maintaining safety.
Saline is commonly used as an irrigant in the root canal treatment of primary molars due to its excellent biocompatibility and safety profile. It is a non-toxic, isotonic solution that poses no risk to the surrounding periapical tissues, which is particularly important in primary teeth where root resorption and open apices are common. This minimizes the chance of damaging the underlying permanent tooth germ, a critical consideration in pediatric dentistry. Saline is also safe if accidentally extruded beyond the apex or ingested, making it a suitable choice for young children.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Clinical Criteria:
- Children aged between 4 to 7 years' old
- Children with deep caries involving pulp in primary molars
- History of abscess, swelling or pus
- Pain on percussion
- Mobility grade 1
- Radiographic criteria:
- Root resorption due to abscess less that â…” of root
- Periapical RL or furcation RL
- Widening in PDL space or loss of lamina dura continuity
You may not qualify if:
- Clinical criteria: -
- Refusal of participation.
- Patient unable to attend to follow up
- Non-restorable tooth.
- Medically compromised patient.
- Uncooperative patient
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cairo Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of dentistry cairo university
Cairo, Egypt
Related Publications (5)
Singh R, Barua P, Kumar M, Safaya R, Monajemi H, Monajemi H. Effect of Ultrasonic Instrumentation in Treatment of Primary Molars. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2017 Sep 1;18(9):750-753. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2120.
PMID: 28874635BACKGROUNDVirdee SS, Seymour DW, Farnell D, Bhamra G, Bhakta S. Efficacy of irrigant activation techniques in removing intracanal smear layer and debris from mature permanent teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Endod J. 2018 Jun;51(6):605-621. doi: 10.1111/iej.12877. Epub 2017 Dec 22.
PMID: 29178166BACKGROUNDKumar RS, Ankola AV, Sankeshwari RM, Hebbal M, Hampiholi V, Kumar S L, Deshpande AP, Choudhury AR, Pai Khot AJ. Effectiveness of various irrigant activation techniques on the penetration of sodium hypochlorite into lateral canals of mature permanent teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Saudi Dent J. 2023 Jan;35(1):1-23. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2022.12.004. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
PMID: 36817024BACKGROUNDAhmed, H.M.A., 2014. Pulpectomy procedures in primary molar teeth. European Journal of General Dentistry, 3(01), pp.3-10
BACKGROUNDFabris AS, Nakano V, Avila-Campos MJ. Bacteriological analysis of necrotic pulp and fistulae in primary teeth. J Appl Oral Sci. 2014 Apr;22(2):118-24. doi: 10.1590/1678-775720130358.
PMID: 24676582BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Internal resident
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 7, 2025
First Posted
June 17, 2025
Study Start
August 1, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
October 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
November 1, 2026
Last Updated
June 17, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-06