Dynamic Stretching vs. Foam Rolling: Effects on Hamstring Flexibility and Muscle Oxygenation in Tight Hamstrings
The Acute Effects of Dynamic Stretching and Foam Rolling on Peripheral Oxygenation and Hamstring Flexibility in in Healthy Individuals With Hamstring Tightness: A Randomized Controlled Assessor Blinded Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
39
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Hamstring muscle flexibility plays a vital role in functional movement and in the prevention of injuries. Reduced flexibility of the hamstring muscles is common and can lead to biomechanical dysfunctions, a limited range of motion, and poor posture. Interventions such as stretching exercises and myofascial release techniques are widely used to improve muscle flexibility. Dynamic stretching, which involves active muscle movements, has been shown to significantly enhance flexibility and may be more effective than static stretching. The use of a foam roller, which is a self-applied myofascial release technique, also improves flexibility and may offer additional benefits by increasing fascial mobility without impairing muscle strength. Peripheral muscle oxygenation reflects a muscle's ability to utilize oxygen and is increasingly used to assess physical performance and fatigue. Although some studies suggest that stretching exercises and foam roller applications may improve peripheral muscle oxygenation, the evidence remains limited. This study aimed to compare the effects of a single session of isolated dynamic stretching and foam roller application on hamstring muscle flexibility and muscle oxygenation. The hypothesis proposed that dynamic stretching would be more effective than foam roller application in enhancing muscle oxygenation, while both interventions would similarly improve muscle flexibility.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 29, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 7, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 7, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 9, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 17, 2025
CompletedApril 15, 2026
April 1, 2026
8 days
June 9, 2025
April 13, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Muscle Oxygenation Assessment
Muscle oxygenation will be assessed using the MOXY Monitor, which is a portable, wireless device based on near-infrared spectroscopy. The monitor will be placed on the belly of the right biceps femoris muscle and secured with an opaque elastic band to prevent interference from ambient light. Measurements will be taken five minutes before and five minutes after the intervention session. During each measurement period, the device will record data for sixty seconds, and the average muscle oxygen saturation value over this period will be used for analysis.
baseline, immediately after the intervention, ten minutes after the baseline
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Active Knee Extension (AKE) Test
baseline, immediately after the intervention, ten minutes after the baseline
Study Arms (3)
Foam Roller
EXPERIMENTALFor the foam rolling intervention, participants were positioned in an upright seated posture with the foam roller placed under the right thigh. The right leg remained extended, while the left leg was crossed over the right knee for added stability. The foam rolling movement began at the area behind the knee and progressed slowly toward the ischial tuberosity, then returned to the starting point in a continuous back-and-forth rolling pattern.
Dynamic Strecth
EXPERIMENTALThe dynamic stretching protocol consisted of 10 different exercises performed over a total duration of 10 minutes at moderate to high intensity.
Control Group
NO INTERVENTIONThe control group will not receive any intervention and will rest for the same duration.
Interventions
FR will be applied to each hamstring muscle for 3 minutes per leg, totaling 6 minutes. The pressure was self-regulated by participants, who are instructed to apply as much body weight as tolerable. The rolling frequency is maintained at approximately 0.5 Hz, corresponding to one complete rolling cycle every 2 seconds. Before the intervention, participants will receive verbal and visual instructions to ensure correct execution.
10 different exercises will be performed over a 13-meter distance, with a 10-second rest period between exercises. During the session, participants will receive verbal feedback to ensure proper posture and technique. Exercises will be video recorded and shared with participants for review and consistency.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Healthy individuals aged between 18 and 35 years
- Both male and female participants
- Absence of any known health conditions
- Hamstring tightness defined as ≥20° of knee flexion angle in Active Knee Extension test
You may not qualify if:
- Any neuromuscular or orthopedic disorders affecting the lower extremities
- Circulatory or vascular problems
- Respiratory or cardiovascular diseases
- Renal failure
- Presence of pain during measurements or exercise protocols
- Excessive skin sensitivity or active skin infection
- History of intense physical activity within the last 48 hours
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Pelin Pişiricilead
Study Sites (1)
Bahcesehir University
Istanbul, Beşiktaş, 34353, Turkey (Türkiye)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Yusuf Akgöl, PT
Bahcesehir University, Graduate Education Institute, Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Master of Science Program
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Pelin Pişirici, PT, PhD
Bahcesehir University, Faculty of Health Sciences
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Assessor will be blind to the groups.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor, PT, PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 9, 2025
First Posted
June 17, 2025
Study Start
April 29, 2025
Primary Completion
May 7, 2025
Study Completion
May 7, 2025
Last Updated
April 15, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04