Guided Pterygoid Implant
Comparing Accuracy of Pterygoid Implants Placement Using Computer-guided Surgical Templates Versus Free Hand Technique
1 other identifier
interventional
12
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Introduction \& Background Alveolar ridge resorption after tooth extraction leads to significant bone loss, complicating prosthetic rehabilitation. Traditional bone grafting methods, though effective, involve long healing times and risks. Pterygoid implants offer a graft-free alternative by engaging dense bone structures like the pterygoid process. However, their placement is technically challenging due to limited visibility and proximity to critical structures. Computer-guided surgery may improve accuracy and reduce complications compared to freehand techniques. Research Question Does computer-guided surgery enhance the accuracy of pterygoid implant placement in atrophic maxillae compared to freehand techniques? Aim To compare the accuracy of computer-generated 3D surgical guides versus freehand placement of pterygoid implants. Hypothesis
- H0: No difference in accuracy between techniques.
- Hₐ: there is difference between two techniques Study Design A prospective randomized controlled trial (1:1 allocation) with 12 implants (6 per group(. Patient Selection Inclusion Criteria: Severe posterior maxillary atrophy (Cawood \& Howell V-VI), residual bone height \<4mm, age 21-75. Exclusion Criteria: Contraindications for surgery, uncontrolled systemic diseases, or acute sinus infections. Methods
- Group A: Implants placed using CBCT-based 3D surgical guides.
- Group B: Freehand placement based on anatomical landmarks.
- Primary Outcome: Implant position accuracy (postoperative CBCT vs. virtual plan(.
- Secondary Outcomes: Surgical time, complications, and stability. Surgical Procedure
- Osteotomy: Angled drilling (45-60°) into the pterygoid process.
- Implant Placement: Torque ≥30 Ncm for primary stability.
- Postoperative Care: Antibiotics, analgesics, and follow-up CBCT at one week. Statistical Analysis Data analyzed using SPSS, with G\*Power determining sample size (85% power, α = 0.05(. Ethical Considerations Approved by institutional review boards, with informed consent and confidentiality maintained.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 3, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 12, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 30, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2026
June 12, 2025
June 1, 2025
10 months
June 3, 2025
June 11, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Accuracy of implant position
The primary outcome will be measured by comparing the position of implant in the virtual plan with that in the postoperative implant or the actual implant and this will be done by making a superimposition of the virtual plan with the postoperative CBCT then putting points on the coronal and apical parts of implants and then start to measure the following data: 1. direct linear measurements between the coronal and apical points of the virtual and actual implants (measured in millimeters) 2. angular deviations between the long axis of virtual and postoperative or actual implants.(measured in degrees) 3. indirect measurements of the coronal and apical points of virtual and actual implants to 3d planes.(measured in mm) All of this will be done for both groups.
the patient will make postoperative CBCT after one week of the surgery to compare it with the preoperative virtual planning done on the preoperative CBCT.
Study Arms (2)
Guided Surgery group
ACTIVE COMPARATORImplants placed using CBCT-based 3D surgical guides.
free hand technique group
PLACEBO COMPARATORFreehand placement based on anatomical landmarks.
Interventions
* Clinical examination will be performed and preoperative CBCT will be taken for all the patients prior to the surgery to evaluate the posterior maxilla for the placement of the pterygoid implants. * Ideal pterygoid implant placement will be planned using the BlueSky Bio software (USA) which will be mostly to emerge from the third molar position and to engage the dense pillar of bone formed by the pyramidal process and pterygoid process of sphenoid bone. * surgical guide will be fabricated which will be either soft tissue without flap elevation.
the surgery will be done without the use of the surgical guides depending on the anatomical landmarks.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with severe posterior maxillary atrophy (Class V-VI Cawood \& Howell classification) requiring pterygoid implant placement.
- Patients with severe alveolar bone atrophy in posterior maxilla (Residual alveolar bone height \<4mm in posterior maxilla precluding conventional implant placement).
- Adequate interarch space ≥7mm for prosthetic rehabilitation.
- Presence of pneumatized maxillary sinus with insufficient bone for sinus augmentation.
- Patients aged 21-75 years with completed craniofacial growth.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with systemic conditions contra-indicating general anesthesia.
- Patients with conditions contraindicating implant placement (e.g.:
- radiation to the head and neck, intra-venous bisphosphonates, uncontrolled Diabetes mellitus).
- Patients with acute maxillary sinus infection or maxillary sinus cyst.
- Restricted mouth opening (less than 3cm inter-arch distance anteriorly).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Fayoum University
Al Fayyum, 63514, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- dentist in medical administration at fayoum university
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 3, 2025
First Posted
June 12, 2025
Study Start
July 30, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2026
Last Updated
June 12, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-06