NCT07016828

Brief Summary

Introduction \& Background Alveolar ridge resorption after tooth extraction leads to significant bone loss, complicating prosthetic rehabilitation. Traditional bone grafting methods, though effective, involve long healing times and risks. Pterygoid implants offer a graft-free alternative by engaging dense bone structures like the pterygoid process. However, their placement is technically challenging due to limited visibility and proximity to critical structures. Computer-guided surgery may improve accuracy and reduce complications compared to freehand techniques. Research Question Does computer-guided surgery enhance the accuracy of pterygoid implant placement in atrophic maxillae compared to freehand techniques? Aim To compare the accuracy of computer-generated 3D surgical guides versus freehand placement of pterygoid implants. Hypothesis

  • H0: No difference in accuracy between techniques.
  • Hₐ: there is difference between two techniques Study Design A prospective randomized controlled trial (1:1 allocation) with 12 implants (6 per group(. Patient Selection Inclusion Criteria: Severe posterior maxillary atrophy (Cawood \& Howell V-VI), residual bone height \<4mm, age 21-75. Exclusion Criteria: Contraindications for surgery, uncontrolled systemic diseases, or acute sinus infections. Methods
  • Group A: Implants placed using CBCT-based 3D surgical guides.
  • Group B: Freehand placement based on anatomical landmarks.
  • Primary Outcome: Implant position accuracy (postoperative CBCT vs. virtual plan(.
  • Secondary Outcomes: Surgical time, complications, and stability. Surgical Procedure
  • Osteotomy: Angled drilling (45-60°) into the pterygoid process.
  • Implant Placement: Torque ≥30 Ncm for primary stability.
  • Postoperative Care: Antibiotics, analgesics, and follow-up CBCT at one week. Statistical Analysis Data analyzed using SPSS, with G\*Power determining sample size (85% power, α = 0.05(. Ethical Considerations Approved by institutional review boards, with informed consent and confidentiality maintained.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
12

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
2mo left

Started Jul 2025

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress84%
Jul 2025Jun 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 3, 2025

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 12, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 30, 2025

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2026

Expected
29 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 30, 2026

Last Updated

June 12, 2025

Status Verified

June 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

10 months

First QC Date

June 3, 2025

Last Update Submit

June 11, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

guided surgerypterygoid implantatrophic maxilla

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Accuracy of implant position

    The primary outcome will be measured by comparing the position of implant in the virtual plan with that in the postoperative implant or the actual implant and this will be done by making a superimposition of the virtual plan with the postoperative CBCT then putting points on the coronal and apical parts of implants and then start to measure the following data: 1. direct linear measurements between the coronal and apical points of the virtual and actual implants (measured in millimeters) 2. angular deviations between the long axis of virtual and postoperative or actual implants.(measured in degrees) 3. indirect measurements of the coronal and apical points of virtual and actual implants to 3d planes.(measured in mm) All of this will be done for both groups.

    the patient will make postoperative CBCT after one week of the surgery to compare it with the preoperative virtual planning done on the preoperative CBCT.

Study Arms (2)

Guided Surgery group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Implants placed using CBCT-based 3D surgical guides.

Device: guided surgery technique

free hand technique group

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Freehand placement based on anatomical landmarks.

Procedure: Free hand technique

Interventions

* Clinical examination will be performed and preoperative CBCT will be taken for all the patients prior to the surgery to evaluate the posterior maxilla for the placement of the pterygoid implants. * Ideal pterygoid implant placement will be planned using the BlueSky Bio software (USA) which will be mostly to emerge from the third molar position and to engage the dense pillar of bone formed by the pyramidal process and pterygoid process of sphenoid bone. * surgical guide will be fabricated which will be either soft tissue without flap elevation.

Guided Surgery group

the surgery will be done without the use of the surgical guides depending on the anatomical landmarks.

free hand technique group

Eligibility Criteria

Age21 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients with severe posterior maxillary atrophy (Class V-VI Cawood \& Howell classification) requiring pterygoid implant placement.
  • Patients with severe alveolar bone atrophy in posterior maxilla (Residual alveolar bone height \<4mm in posterior maxilla precluding conventional implant placement).
  • Adequate interarch space ≥7mm for prosthetic rehabilitation.
  • Presence of pneumatized maxillary sinus with insufficient bone for sinus augmentation.
  • Patients aged 21-75 years with completed craniofacial growth.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with systemic conditions contra-indicating general anesthesia.
  • Patients with conditions contraindicating implant placement (e.g.:
  • radiation to the head and neck, intra-venous bisphosphonates, uncontrolled Diabetes mellitus).
  • Patients with acute maxillary sinus infection or maxillary sinus cyst.
  • Restricted mouth opening (less than 3cm inter-arch distance anteriorly).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Fayoum University

Al Fayyum, 63514, Egypt

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Atrophic Maxilla

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Bone ResorptionBone DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesMaxillary DiseasesJaw DiseasesStomatognathic Diseases

Central Study Contacts

norhan magdy yousef, BDs

CONTACT

al shimaa ahmed shaban, professor

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
dentist in medical administration at fayoum university

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 3, 2025

First Posted

June 12, 2025

Study Start

July 30, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Last Updated

June 12, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-06

Locations