Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Patients With Isolated Cervical Dystonia (CD)
A Randomized, Sham-controlled Study of Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) and Its Effects on the Neurophysiological Properties of the Sensorimotor Network and Motor Symptom Severity in Patients With Isolated Cervical Dystonia (CD)
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Cervical dystonia (CD) is a movement disorder characterized by involuntary muscle contractions of the neck, leading to abnormal head postures and movement, pain and impaired motor function. Current treatments for CD, such as botulinum toxin injections and physical therapy, may not always provide sufficient relief of symptoms and may fail to offer long-term benefits for patients. As a result, new therapeutic approaches are needed. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique that modulates neuronal activity. Recent neurophysiological studies suggest that cerebellar tDCS (ctDCS), in particular, could be beneficial in modulating the activity of the sensorimotor network in CD. This clinical trial aims to investigate the effects of ctDCS on the excitability of the sensorimotor network and motor symptom severity in CD patients. Applying transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) we will evaluate the effects of anodal, cathodal and sham ctDCS to improve the understanding of the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying CD and the potential therapeutic role of ctDCS.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 15, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 19, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 11, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2025
CompletedJune 11, 2025
May 1, 2025
1 year
May 19, 2025
June 9, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Changes in sensorimotor network
Before and after each tDCS intervention, TMS will be used to assess the neurophysiological properties of the sensorimotor network with four main metrics: 1. Single-pulse TMS (SP-TMS): MEPs will be recorded from the right FDI in response to single-pulse TMS applied over the left primary motor cortex. 2. Short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI): SICI will be assessed using a paired-pulse TMS protocol, in which two stimuli are delivered at a short interstimulus interval over the primary motor cortex. 3. Short-latency afferent inhibition (SAI): SAI consists of electrical conditioning stimuli to the right index finger preceding the test stimulus delivered by TMS to the left primary motor cortex. 4. Cerebellar-brain-inhibition (CBI): To assess CBI, a conditioning stimulus will be applied over the right cerebellar hemisphere using a second magnetic coil, followed by a cortical test stimulus over the left primary motor cortex.
Baseline (pre-intervention) and immediately after the intervention
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Clinical symptom severity
Baseline (pre-intervention) and immediately after the intervention
Study Arms (3)
Anodal ctDCS
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients receive anodal ctDCS stimulation for 20 minutes with 2 mA
Cathodal ctDCS
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients receive cathodal ctDCS stimulation for 20 minutes with 2 mA
Sham stimulation
SHAM COMPARATORPatients receive ctDCS stimulation for 20 minutes with 0 mA
Interventions
CtDCS will be delivered using an DC-stimulator and two saline-soaked sponge electrodes: one electrode placed 3 cm lateral to the right of the inion, the other electrode on the right buccinator muscle. A 2 mA current will be delivered through these electrodes for a duration of 20 minutes with a 8-second fade-in and fade-out.
The tDCS procedure will be identical to the active (anodal and cathodal) stimulation condition, but stimulation will cease after 30 seconds.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Clinical diagnosis of isolated cervical dystonia
- Written informed consent by the patient
You may not qualify if:
- History of other neurological disorders other than CD
- Secondary dystonia
- Severe head tremor
- Intake of centrally acting medication
- Contraindications to TMS, such as metallic implants, pregnancy and history of seizures
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
Hamburg, Germany
Related Publications (7)
Ugawa Y, Uesaka Y, Terao Y, Hanajima R, Kanazawa I. Magnetic stimulation over the cerebellum in humans. Ann Neurol. 1995 Jun;37(6):703-13. doi: 10.1002/ana.410370603.
PMID: 7778843BACKGROUNDPorcacchia P, Alvarez de Toledo P, Rodriguez-Baena A, Martin-Rodriguez JF, Palomar FJ, Vargas-Gonzalez L, Jesus S, Koch G, Mir P. Abnormal cerebellar connectivity and plasticity in isolated cervical dystonia. PLoS One. 2019 Jan 25;14(1):e0211367. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211367. eCollection 2019.
PMID: 30682155BACKGROUNDNitsche MA, Paulus W. Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol. 2000 Sep 15;527 Pt 3(Pt 3):633-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-1-00633.x.
PMID: 10990547BACKGROUNDHamada M, Strigaro G, Murase N, Sadnicka A, Galea JM, Edwards MJ, Rothwell JC. Cerebellar modulation of human associative plasticity. J Physiol. 2012 May 15;590(10):2365-74. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.230540. Epub 2012 Apr 2.
PMID: 22473780BACKGROUNDGrimm K, Prilop L, Schon G, Gelderblom M, Misselhorn J, Gerloff C, Zittel S. Cerebellar Modulation of Sensorimotor Associative Plasticity Is Impaired in Cervical Dystonia. Mov Disord. 2023 Nov;38(11):2084-2093. doi: 10.1002/mds.29586. Epub 2023 Aug 28.
PMID: 37641392BACKGROUNDBrighina F, Romano M, Giglia G, Saia V, Puma A, Giglia F, Fierro B. Effects of cerebellar TMS on motor cortex of patients with focal dystonia: a preliminary report. Exp Brain Res. 2009 Feb;192(4):651-6. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1572-9. Epub 2008 Sep 25.
PMID: 18815775BACKGROUNDAlbanese A, Bhatia K, Bressman SB, Delong MR, Fahn S, Fung VS, Hallett M, Jankovic J, Jinnah HA, Klein C, Lang AE, Mink JW, Teller JK. Phenomenology and classification of dystonia: a consensus update. Mov Disord. 2013 Jun 15;28(7):863-73. doi: 10.1002/mds.25475. Epub 2013 May 6.
PMID: 23649720BACKGROUND
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Double blind
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr. med.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 19, 2025
First Posted
June 11, 2025
Study Start
September 15, 2024
Primary Completion
September 30, 2025
Study Completion
December 30, 2025
Last Updated
June 11, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share