Comparison of Traditional and Ultrasound-Guided Techniques for Vascular Access in Patients With Difficult Venous Access in Emergency Department.
PUVASECO
1 other identifier
interventional
200
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this clinical trial is to compare the use of ultrasound versus the traditional palpation and visualization technique for vascular punctures, both peripheral venous and arterial punctures for arterial blood gas sampling, in patients presenting to hospital emergency departments. The main questions it seeks to answer are: Does the use of ultrasound facilitate peripheral venous cannulation in patients with difficult venous access in the emergency department? Does the use of ultrasound facilitate arterial puncture in patients presenting to the emergency department who require arterial blood gases? The researchers will compare the use of ultrasound with the traditional technique in vascular punctures by emergency department nurses. To determine the differences in the number of attempts needed, the number of professionals needed to perform the technique, the time invested, the pain produced with both techniques, etc., the researchers will compare the use of ultrasound with the traditional technique for vascular punctures by emergency department nurses.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Aug 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 14, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 10, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 15, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 20, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 31, 2026
CompletedApril 13, 2026
April 1, 2026
5 months
May 14, 2025
April 6, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Scores obtained by DIVA patients on the A-DICAVE scale
Results of the assessment by the adult patients included in the study using the A-DICAVE scale (Adult Venous Catheterisation Difficulty Scale). With values from 0 to 5. Values greater than or equal to 3 indicate that the patient has difficult venous access.
At the beginning
Scores obtained by DIVA patients on the DIVA scale
Assessment of paediatric patients using the DIVA scale (Dificil Acceso Vascular). Values above 4 indicate that the patient has a difficult venous access.
At the beginning
Number of patients undergoing successful peripheral venous cannulation
Successful peripheral venous cannulation using both techniques
During the intervention, expected time 1 year.
Time spent on the techniques to be compared
Time spent on the techniques from start to completion of the procedure
During the intervention, expected time 1 year.
Number of professionals involved in the technique
Number of nursing professionals required to perform the technique successfully.
During the intervention, expected time 1 year.
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Pain produced by the techniques
During the intervention, expected time 1 year.
Satisfaction perceived by professionals after performing the techniques
During the intervention, expected time 1 year.
Study Arms (2)
Echoguided technique
EXPERIMENTALUltrasound will be used for peripheral venous cannulation and arterial puncture by direct visualisation of the needle in the selected structure.
Traditional technique
ACTIVE COMPARATORVascular puncture will be performed using the traditional visualisation/palpation technique.
Interventions
Peripheral venous cannulation with short peripheral vascular access device, performed by ultrasound technique.
Arterial puncture using a needle and heparinised syringe to extract a sample for arterial blood gas analysis, using the ultrasound-guided technique.
Cannulation of a short peripheral vascular access device using the traditional visualisation and palpation technique.
Arterial puncture using a needle and heparinised syringe to extract an arterial blood sample for arterial gamosetry analysis, performed using the traditional arterial pulse palpation technique.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Prescription for CIP or GA cannulation.
- Informed consent signed by the patient or patient's representative.
- A score ≥3 on the A-DICAVE scale or ≥4 on the DIVA scale for PIVC.
You may not qualify if:
- Scores below 3 on the A-DICAVE scale or below 4 on the DIVA scale for PIVC.
- Inability to obtain informed consent from the patient or patient's representative
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Mercedes Segunda Peralta Gámezlead
- University Rovira i Virgilicollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Hospital Emergency Department of the Nuestra Señora de Sonsoles Hospital in Ávila.
Ávila, 05004, Spain
Related Publications (15)
Romo-Miguel P, Ballesteros-Pena S. Ultrasound-guided puncture vs conventional technique for arterial blood gas analysis sampling in adults: A systematic review. Enferm Intensiva (Engl Ed). 2024 Oct-Dec;35(4):368-375. doi: 10.1016/j.enfie.2023.10.003. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
PMID: 38453623RESULTTran QK, Flanagan K, Fairchild M, Yardi I, Pourmand A. Nurses and Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Versus Traditional Venous Access: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Emerg Nurs. 2022 Mar;48(2):145-158.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2021.12.003. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
PMID: 35125291RESULTSalleras-Duran L, Fuentes-Pumarola C, Fontova-Almato A, Roqueta-Vall-Llosera M, Camara-Liebana D, Ballester-Ferrando D. Pain and Satisfaction Perceptions of Ultrasound-Guided Versus Conventional Peripheral Intravenous Catheterization: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Pain Manag Nurs. 2024 Feb;25(1):e37-e44. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2023.07.010. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
PMID: 37633742RESULTOsakidetza. Guía de procedimiento de punción arterial para gasometría en población adulta. 2020. Available on: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339483856_ guia_de_procedimiento_de_puncion_arterial_para_gasometria_en_poblacion_adulta.
RESULTKaganovskaya M, Wuerz L. Development of an educational program using ultrasonography in vascular access for nurse practitioner students. Br J Nurs. 2021 Jan 28;30(2):S34-S42. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2021.30.2.S34.
PMID: 33529109RESULTOcsa C, Gimeno V, Cortés M, Naccarato G, Reinoso G, Nuñez P. Desarrollo de un programa de capacitación en la colocación de catéteres venosos periféricos guiada por ecografía: Experiencia en un hospital pediátrico de tercer nivel. Emerg pediatr. 2024;3(1):44-8.
RESULTAmick AE, Feinsmith SE, Davis EM, Sell J, Macdonald V, Trinquero P, Moore AG, Gappmeier V, Colton K, Cunningham A, Ford W, Feinglass J, Barsuk JH. Simulation-Based Mastery Learning Improves Ultrasound-Guided Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Insertion Skills of Practicing Nurses. Simul Healthc. 2022 Feb 1;17(1):7-14. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000545.
PMID: 33428356RESULTMcKinney A, Steanson K, Lebar K. A Standardized Training Program in Ultrasound-Guided Intravenous Line Placement: Improving Nurses' Confidence and Success. Adv Neonatal Care. 2023 Feb 1;23(1):17-22. doi: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000969. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
PMID: 35170498RESULTRodriguez-Herrera A, Solaz-Garcia A, Molla-Olmos E, Ferrer-Puchol D, Esteve-Claramunt F, Trujillo-Barbera S, Garcia-Bermejo P, Casana-Mohedo J. Use of the Ultrasound Technique as Compared to the Standard Technique for the Improvement of Venous Cannulation in Patients with Difficult Access. Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Jan 29;10(2):261. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10020261.
PMID: 35206876RESULTLam C, Dunstan L, Sweeny A, Watkins S, George S, Snelling PJ. A survey of paediatric difficult peripheral intravenous access in the emergency department and use of point-of-care ultrasound. Australas J Ultrasound Med. 2023 Jul 13;26(3):184-190. doi: 10.1002/ajum.12353. eCollection 2023 Aug.
PMID: 37701768RESULTPittiruti M, Van Boxtel T, Scoppettuolo G, Carr P, Konstantinou E, Ortiz Miluy G, Lamperti M, Goossens GA, Simcock L, Dupont C, Inwood S, Bertoglio S, Nicholson J, Pinelli F, Pepe G. European recommendations on the proper indication and use of peripheral venous access devices (the ERPIUP consensus): A WoCoVA project. J Vasc Access. 2023 Jan;24(1):165-182. doi: 10.1177/11297298211023274. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
PMID: 34088239RESULTSalleras-Duran L, Fuentes-Pumarola C, Ballester-Ferrando D, Congost-Devesa L, Delclos-Rabassa J, Fontova-Almato A. Development, Diagnostic Sensitivity, and Prognostic Accuracy of the Adult-Difficult Venous Catheterization Scale for Emergency Departments. J Emerg Nurs. 2020 Nov;46(6):827-837.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2020.06.013. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
PMID: 32972765RESULTSalleras-Duran L, Fuentes-Pumarola C. [Ultrasound-guided peripheral catheterization]. Enferm Clin. 2016 Sep-Oct;26(5):298-306. doi: 10.1016/j.enfcli.2015.04.002. Epub 2015 Jun 4. Spanish.
PMID: 26051396RESULTGenre Grandpierre R, Bobbia X, Muller L, Markarian T, Occean BV, Pommet S, Roger C, Lefrant JY, de la Coussaye JE, Claret PG. Ultrasound guidance in difficult radial artery puncture for blood gas analysis: A prospective, randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2019 Mar 20;14(3):e0213683. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213683. eCollection 2019.
PMID: 30893349RESULTRodríguez Calero MA, Miquel Rodríguez Calero CA. Definiendo la vía venosa periférica de difícil canalización y los factores de riesgo asociados. Revisión sistemática Defining the venous peripheral via of difficult canalization and risk factors associated. Sistemic review. Medicina Balear. 2019;34(1):12-2018.
RESULT
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Graduate in nursing, master's degree in research in nursing sciences.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 14, 2025
First Posted
June 10, 2025
Study Start
August 15, 2025
Primary Completion
January 20, 2026
Study Completion
March 31, 2026
Last Updated
April 13, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
It is considered that the individual information of the participants will not be relevant, as the information will consist of the variables that allow the comparison of the techniques under study, and these data will be shared with the results. Sharing more information could only violate the protection of participants' privacy without providing relevant data.