NCT07012083

Brief Summary

This study aims to investigate physicians' adherence to Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) guidelines regarding Anti-rabies post-exposure prophylaxis in Egypt.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
214

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2025

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 20, 2025

Completed
12 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2025

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 10, 2025

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 31, 2026

Completed
29 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

March 30, 2026

Status Verified

May 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

8 months

First QC Date

May 20, 2025

Last Update Submit

March 26, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Adherence to Anti-rabies PEP Guidelines

    This study aims to investigate physicians' adherence to the Advisory Committee on Immunization. Practices (ACIP) guidelines regarding Anti-rabies post-exposure prophylaxis in Egypt. This will be through a score given for the correct response to the case-based questionnaire. This questionnaire include 10 case-based scenarios where anti-rabies post-exposure prophylaxis may or may not be indicated as per ACIP guidelines. True response will be scored 1, wrong response will be scored 0 with maximum total score of 10. Higher score reflects better adherence to guidelines recommendations \& vice versa.

    6 months

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Health & Economic burden of such malpractice

    9 months

Interventions

surveyOTHER

This cross-sectional survey study will be conducted on a consecutive sample of physicians who treat patients with animal bites potentially requiring post-exposure anti-rabies prophylaxis. The sample will include emergency physicians, general practice or family physicians, and surgeons of both sexes, with varying degrees of experience and post-graduate clinical training. All participants will consent to submit an anonymous Google Form-based questionnaire. The designed questionnaire will include introductory personal, academic, and work experience data about the physicians as gender, age, specialty, workplace, highest achieved medical-academic or training degree, and number of years of postgraduate clinical work experience. Candidates will be asked to reflect on their pre and postgraduate education/training quality and their confidence level in prescribing anti-rabies post-exposure prophylaxis treatment. (as a linear scale).

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

This cross-sectional survey study will be conducted on a consecutive sample of physicians who treat patients with animal bites potentially requiring post-exposure anti-rabies prophylaxis. The sample will include emergency physicians, general practice or family physicians, and surgeons of both sexes, with varying degrees of experience and post-graduate clinical training.

You may qualify if:

  • Physicians who treat patients with animal bites potentially requiring post-exposure anti-rabies prophylaxis. The sample will include emergency physicians, general practice or family physicians, and surgeons of both sexes, with varying degrees of experience and post-graduate clinical training.

You may not qualify if:

  • Incomplete record filling

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Faculty of Medicine Tanta university

Tanta, Gharbia Governorate, Egypt

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Catherine M Brown, Alfred DeMaria. Indications for post-exposure rabies prophylaxis In: UpToDate, Connor RF (Ed), Wolters Kluwer. (Accessed on Oct 15, 2024).

    BACKGROUND
  • Protocol for a well-performed rabies post-exposure prophylaxis delivery: To read along with the decision trees, 1- Wound Risk Assessment and 2 - PEP Risk Assessment. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2024. https://doi.org/10.2471/ B09018.

    BACKGROUND
  • Rupprecht CE, Briggs D, Brown CM, Franka R, Katz SL, Kerr HD, Lett SM, Levis R, Meltzer MI, Schaffner W, Cieslak PR; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Use of a reduced (4-dose) vaccine schedule for postexposure prophylaxis to prevent human rabies: recommendations of the advisory committee on immunization practices. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2010 Mar 19;59(RR-2):1-9.

    PMID: 20300058BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Rabies

Interventions

Surveys and Questionnaires

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Rhabdoviridae InfectionsMononegavirales InfectionsRNA Virus InfectionsVirus DiseasesInfections

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Data CollectionEpidemiologic MethodsInvestigative TechniquesHealth Care Evaluation MechanismsQuality of Health CareHealth Care Quality, Access, and EvaluationPublic HealthEnvironment and Public Health

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
CROSS SECTIONAL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Lecturer of Emergency Medicine

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 20, 2025

First Posted

June 10, 2025

Study Start

June 1, 2025

Primary Completion

January 31, 2026

Study Completion

March 1, 2026

Last Updated

March 30, 2026

Record last verified: 2025-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations