NCT07007871

Brief Summary

The tutoring and counseling program for adolescents from low socioeconomic backgrounds facing mental health challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic will be assessed using a randomized controlled trial. The study will recruit secondary students with confirmed or suspected mental illnesses and trained university student tutors with backgrounds in education or psychology. The program provides both online and in-person support. Various measures, including surveys on depression, anxiety, stress, academic performance, executive function, emotional and behavioral issues, and tutor efficacy, will be used. Qualitative feedback will be gathered through open-ended questions. It is hoped that the findings will contribute valuable insights into effective support strategies for this vulnerable population.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
170

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2020

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2020

Completed
2.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 30, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 30, 2022

Completed
2.4 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 20, 2025

Completed
17 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 6, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

June 6, 2025

Status Verified

May 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2.1 years

First QC Date

May 20, 2025

Last Update Submit

May 28, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Adolescentscounsellingmental healthtutoringpandemic

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (14)

  • Depression, anxiety, and stress

    The Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21) is a set of three self-report scales designed to measure the emotional states of depression, anxiety, and stress. Each of the three DASS-21 scales contains seven items, divided into subscales with similar content. Students are asked to rate on a 4-point Likert scale from 0 (never) to 3 (almost always).

    One week before the intervention

  • Depression, anxiety, and stress

    The Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21) is a set of three self-report scales designed to measure the emotional states of depression, anxiety, and stress. Each of the three DASS-21 scales contains seven items, divided into subscales with similar content. Students are asked to rate on a 4-point Likert scale from 0 (never) to 3 (almost always).

    One week after the intervention

  • Executive function

    The Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) is designed to assess executive function in the home environment. A short version of the BRIEF consists of nine items, with the following three scales obtained: Working memory, inhibition, and cognitive flexibility. Parents are asked to rate their child's behavior on a 3-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (never) to 3 (often).

    One week before the intervention

  • Executive function

    The Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) is designed to assess executive function in the home environment. A short version of the BRIEF consists of nine items, with the following three scales obtained: Working memory, inhibition, and cognitive flexibility. Parents are asked to rate their child's behavior on a 3-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (never) to 3 (often).

    One week after the intervention

  • Conduct problem and emotional symptoms

    The emotional symptoms and conduct problems subscales of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) are administered to parents to assess the child's behavior over the last six months. Each subscale consists of five items using a 3-point Likert scale: 0 (not true), 1 (somewhat true), and 2 (certainly true). Higher scores reflect more severe difficulties.

    One week before the intervention

  • Conduct problem and emotional symptoms

    The emotional symptoms and conduct problems subscales of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) are administered to parents to assess the child's behavior over the last six months. Each subscale consists of five items using a 3-point Likert scale: 0 (not true), 1 (somewhat true), and 2 (certainly true). Higher scores reflect more severe difficulties.

    One week after the intervention

  • Teacher-reported academic achievement

    Students' academic achievement in Chinese, English, and Mathematics is rated by teachers using a 5-point scale. The scale ranged from 1 (bottom 20% of the performance) to 5 (top 20% of performance).

    One week before the intervention

  • Teacher-reported academic achievement

    Students' academic achievement in Chinese, English, and Mathematics is rated by teachers using a 5-point scale. The scale ranged from 1 (bottom 20% of the performance) to 5 (top 20% of performance).

    One week after the intervention

  • Parental stress

    The Parental Stress Scale (PSS) has 18 items using a 6-point Likert scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 6 (strongly agree). A composite score is calculated by adding all items (after the 7 items were reversed). A higher PSS score indicates higher stress levels.

    One week before the intervention

  • Parental stress

    The Parental Stress Scale (PSS) has 18 items using a 6-point Likert scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 6 (strongly agree). A composite score is calculated by adding all items (after the 7 items were reversed). A higher PSS score indicates higher stress levels.

    One week after the intervention

  • Tutor efficacy for inclusive practice

    The Teacher Efficacy for Inclusive Practices scale (TEIP) is designed to measure perceived tutor efficacy in teaching in inclusive classrooms. The scale consists of 18 items scored on a 6-point Likert scale, from 1 (strongly disagree) to 6 (strongly agree). The 18 items are divided into three subscales: Efficacy to use inclusive instructions, efficacy in collaboration, and efficacy in managing behaviors.

    One week before the intervention

  • Tutor efficacy for inclusive practice

    The Teacher Efficacy for Inclusive Practices scale (TEIP) is designed to measure perceived tutor efficacy in teaching in inclusive classrooms. The scale consists of 18 items scored on a 6-point Likert scale, from 1 (strongly disagree) to 6 (strongly agree). The 18 items are divided into three subscales: Efficacy to use inclusive instructions, efficacy in collaboration, and efficacy in managing behaviors.

    One week after the intervention

  • Open-Ended Questions

    Open-ended questions are also included in the questionnaire to gather written feedback from the students regarding their expectations and experiences of participating in the tutoring and counseling program. Examples of open-ended questions for students include: "What difficulties have you encountered in study and life?", "What are your expectations for taking part in this tutoring and counseling program?", and "In what ways do you believe this tutoring and counseling program has been most helpful to you?". Examples of open-ended questions for tutors include: "What have you learned as a well-being tutor?", and "What are your thoughts on implementing the tutoring and counseling program for students with psychological needs?".

    One week before the intervention

  • Open-Ended Questions

    Open-ended questions are also included in the questionnaire to gather written feedback from the students regarding their expectations and experiences of participating in the tutoring and counseling program. Examples of open-ended questions for students include: "What difficulties have you encountered in study and life?", "What are your expectations for taking part in this tutoring and counseling program?", and "In what ways do you believe this tutoring and counseling program has been most helpful to you?". Examples of open-ended questions for tutors include: "What have you learned as a well-being tutor?", and "What are your thoughts on implementing the tutoring and counseling program for students with psychological needs?".

    One week after the intervention

Study Arms (2)

Experimental Group

EXPERIMENTAL

Students allocated to the experimental group begin receiving the tutoring and counseling program.

Other: Tutoring and Counselling (1)

Waitlist Control Group

OTHER

Students assigned to the waitlist control group receive the program after the experimental group completes it.

Other: Tutoring and Counselling (2)

Interventions

During the intervention, students participate in a structured program designed to support those with confirmed or suspected mental illness. The program includes two weekly group tutorial sessions lasting 1.5 hours each, organized in small groups of 4-5 students to foster interaction and peer support. Students also receive two individual counseling sessions per month, each lasting one hour. Tutor-group assignments are based on tutor availability and location for logistical efficiency.

Experimental Group

Students assigned to the waitlist control group receive the program after the experimental group completes it. Students participate in a structured program designed to support those with confirmed or suspected mental illness. The program includes two weekly group tutorial sessions lasting 1.5 hours each, organized in small groups of 4-5 students to foster interaction and peer support. Students also receive two individual counseling sessions per month, each lasting one hour. Tutor-group assignments are based on tutor availability and location for logistical efficiency.

Waitlist Control Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age12 Years - 18 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • aged between 12 and 18 years
  • studying at secondary schools in HK
  • low socioeconomic status
  • confirmed or suspected mental illness

You may not qualify if:

  • diagnosed with neurological needs
  • received tutoring and counselling

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

EdUHK

Tai Po, Hong Kong

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Psychological Well-Being

Interventions

Counseling

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Personal SatisfactionBehavior

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Mental Health ServicesBehavioral Disciplines and ActivitiesCommunity Health ServicesHealth ServicesHealth Care Facilities Workforce and Services

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: A randomized waitlist-controlled design will be used to examine the effectiveness of the tutoring and counseling service program. Eligible secondary school students will be allocated to the experimental group and waitlist control group, alongside trained university student tutors with education or psychology background. All assessments will be conducted individually for each student by independent assessors who are blinded to the treatment conditions.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 20, 2025

First Posted

June 6, 2025

Study Start

December 1, 2020

Primary Completion

December 30, 2022

Study Completion

December 30, 2022

Last Updated

June 6, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-05

Locations