Mindmatters: Tutoring and Counseling Program
Evaluating the Impact of a Tutoring and Counseling Program for Low Income Secondary School Students With Mental Challenges in Hong Kong During COVID-19: A Randomized Control Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
170
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The tutoring and counseling program for adolescents from low socioeconomic backgrounds facing mental health challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic will be assessed using a randomized controlled trial. The study will recruit secondary students with confirmed or suspected mental illnesses and trained university student tutors with backgrounds in education or psychology. The program provides both online and in-person support. Various measures, including surveys on depression, anxiety, stress, academic performance, executive function, emotional and behavioral issues, and tutor efficacy, will be used. Qualitative feedback will be gathered through open-ended questions. It is hoped that the findings will contribute valuable insights into effective support strategies for this vulnerable population.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Dec 2020
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 30, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 20, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 6, 2025
CompletedJune 6, 2025
May 1, 2025
2.1 years
May 20, 2025
May 28, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (14)
Depression, anxiety, and stress
The Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21) is a set of three self-report scales designed to measure the emotional states of depression, anxiety, and stress. Each of the three DASS-21 scales contains seven items, divided into subscales with similar content. Students are asked to rate on a 4-point Likert scale from 0 (never) to 3 (almost always).
One week before the intervention
Depression, anxiety, and stress
The Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21) is a set of three self-report scales designed to measure the emotional states of depression, anxiety, and stress. Each of the three DASS-21 scales contains seven items, divided into subscales with similar content. Students are asked to rate on a 4-point Likert scale from 0 (never) to 3 (almost always).
One week after the intervention
Executive function
The Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) is designed to assess executive function in the home environment. A short version of the BRIEF consists of nine items, with the following three scales obtained: Working memory, inhibition, and cognitive flexibility. Parents are asked to rate their child's behavior on a 3-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (never) to 3 (often).
One week before the intervention
Executive function
The Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) is designed to assess executive function in the home environment. A short version of the BRIEF consists of nine items, with the following three scales obtained: Working memory, inhibition, and cognitive flexibility. Parents are asked to rate their child's behavior on a 3-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (never) to 3 (often).
One week after the intervention
Conduct problem and emotional symptoms
The emotional symptoms and conduct problems subscales of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) are administered to parents to assess the child's behavior over the last six months. Each subscale consists of five items using a 3-point Likert scale: 0 (not true), 1 (somewhat true), and 2 (certainly true). Higher scores reflect more severe difficulties.
One week before the intervention
Conduct problem and emotional symptoms
The emotional symptoms and conduct problems subscales of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) are administered to parents to assess the child's behavior over the last six months. Each subscale consists of five items using a 3-point Likert scale: 0 (not true), 1 (somewhat true), and 2 (certainly true). Higher scores reflect more severe difficulties.
One week after the intervention
Teacher-reported academic achievement
Students' academic achievement in Chinese, English, and Mathematics is rated by teachers using a 5-point scale. The scale ranged from 1 (bottom 20% of the performance) to 5 (top 20% of performance).
One week before the intervention
Teacher-reported academic achievement
Students' academic achievement in Chinese, English, and Mathematics is rated by teachers using a 5-point scale. The scale ranged from 1 (bottom 20% of the performance) to 5 (top 20% of performance).
One week after the intervention
Parental stress
The Parental Stress Scale (PSS) has 18 items using a 6-point Likert scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 6 (strongly agree). A composite score is calculated by adding all items (after the 7 items were reversed). A higher PSS score indicates higher stress levels.
One week before the intervention
Parental stress
The Parental Stress Scale (PSS) has 18 items using a 6-point Likert scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 6 (strongly agree). A composite score is calculated by adding all items (after the 7 items were reversed). A higher PSS score indicates higher stress levels.
One week after the intervention
Tutor efficacy for inclusive practice
The Teacher Efficacy for Inclusive Practices scale (TEIP) is designed to measure perceived tutor efficacy in teaching in inclusive classrooms. The scale consists of 18 items scored on a 6-point Likert scale, from 1 (strongly disagree) to 6 (strongly agree). The 18 items are divided into three subscales: Efficacy to use inclusive instructions, efficacy in collaboration, and efficacy in managing behaviors.
One week before the intervention
Tutor efficacy for inclusive practice
The Teacher Efficacy for Inclusive Practices scale (TEIP) is designed to measure perceived tutor efficacy in teaching in inclusive classrooms. The scale consists of 18 items scored on a 6-point Likert scale, from 1 (strongly disagree) to 6 (strongly agree). The 18 items are divided into three subscales: Efficacy to use inclusive instructions, efficacy in collaboration, and efficacy in managing behaviors.
One week after the intervention
Open-Ended Questions
Open-ended questions are also included in the questionnaire to gather written feedback from the students regarding their expectations and experiences of participating in the tutoring and counseling program. Examples of open-ended questions for students include: "What difficulties have you encountered in study and life?", "What are your expectations for taking part in this tutoring and counseling program?", and "In what ways do you believe this tutoring and counseling program has been most helpful to you?". Examples of open-ended questions for tutors include: "What have you learned as a well-being tutor?", and "What are your thoughts on implementing the tutoring and counseling program for students with psychological needs?".
One week before the intervention
Open-Ended Questions
Open-ended questions are also included in the questionnaire to gather written feedback from the students regarding their expectations and experiences of participating in the tutoring and counseling program. Examples of open-ended questions for students include: "What difficulties have you encountered in study and life?", "What are your expectations for taking part in this tutoring and counseling program?", and "In what ways do you believe this tutoring and counseling program has been most helpful to you?". Examples of open-ended questions for tutors include: "What have you learned as a well-being tutor?", and "What are your thoughts on implementing the tutoring and counseling program for students with psychological needs?".
One week after the intervention
Study Arms (2)
Experimental Group
EXPERIMENTALStudents allocated to the experimental group begin receiving the tutoring and counseling program.
Waitlist Control Group
OTHERStudents assigned to the waitlist control group receive the program after the experimental group completes it.
Interventions
During the intervention, students participate in a structured program designed to support those with confirmed or suspected mental illness. The program includes two weekly group tutorial sessions lasting 1.5 hours each, organized in small groups of 4-5 students to foster interaction and peer support. Students also receive two individual counseling sessions per month, each lasting one hour. Tutor-group assignments are based on tutor availability and location for logistical efficiency.
Students assigned to the waitlist control group receive the program after the experimental group completes it. Students participate in a structured program designed to support those with confirmed or suspected mental illness. The program includes two weekly group tutorial sessions lasting 1.5 hours each, organized in small groups of 4-5 students to foster interaction and peer support. Students also receive two individual counseling sessions per month, each lasting one hour. Tutor-group assignments are based on tutor availability and location for logistical efficiency.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- aged between 12 and 18 years
- studying at secondary schools in HK
- low socioeconomic status
- confirmed or suspected mental illness
You may not qualify if:
- diagnosed with neurological needs
- received tutoring and counselling
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
EdUHK
Tai Po, Hong Kong
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 20, 2025
First Posted
June 6, 2025
Study Start
December 1, 2020
Primary Completion
December 30, 2022
Study Completion
December 30, 2022
Last Updated
June 6, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-05