The Effects Of Occupation-Based Self-Regulation Program On Sensory Processing, Executive Functions and Occupational Performance In Preschool Children With Screen Addiction
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this interventional study was to measure the effectiveness of a self-regulation program for screen addiction in preschool children aged 4-5 years. The main questions it aimed to answer were: Does a self-regulation intervention program reduce screen addiction in preschool children? Does a self-regulation intervention program improve self-regulation skills in preschool children? Does a self-regulation intervention program improve sensory processing skills in preschool children? Does a self-regulation intervention program improve reading performance in preschool children?
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 21, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 18, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 4, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2025
CompletedJune 6, 2025
June 1, 2025
11 days
May 18, 2025
June 3, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Screen Time
The average daily screen time for one week at the beginning of the study and the average daily screen time for one week at the end will be measured.
The average daily screen time for one week at the beginning of the study and the average daily screen time for one week at the end will be measured.
Sensory Processing
The Dunn Sensory Profile was developed to assess responses in children to a variety of common sensory experiences. Parents are asked to rate the frequency of responses in their children to 125 common experiences using a Likert scale format. These questions and responses are divided into eight categories: Auditory, Visual, Activity Level, Taste/Smell, Body Position, Movement, Touch, and Emotional/Social. The sensory profile was deemed appropriate for children ages 3-10 and was standardized on 1,200 children with and without disabilities. Content and construct validity have been established. Responses are summarized in six sensory processing domains (Auditory Processing, Visual Processing, Vestibular Processing, Tactile Processing, Multisensory Processing, Oral Sensory Processing), five modulation processes, and three behavioral and emotional responses domains. The validity and reliability studies of the scale in Turkish.
Both assessments will take 15 minutes each, one at the beginning of the study, the day before the intervention, and one at the end of the study, the day after the intervention.
Executive Function/Self Regulation
The scale consists of 3 levels of applications. At the first level, the child is asked to touch his feet when he is told to "touch his head" and to touch his head when he is told to "touch his feet". If he is successful at this level, he is asked to touch his shoulders when he is told to "touch his knee" and to touch his knees when he is told to "touch his shoulder". If he is successful at this level, he is asked to touch his knees when he is told to "touch his head", to touch his shoulders when he is told to "touch his feet", to touch his feet when he is told to "touch his shoulder" and to touch his head when he is told to "touch his knees". If he can do the given command without any mistakes, he is given 2 points, if he is oriented towards the wrong and does it correctly, he is given 1 point and if he gives the wrong answer, he is given 0 points. A total score of 0-60 is given with 10 applications at each level. As the score increases, the self-regulation score will increase.
Both assessments will take 30 minutes each, one at the beginning of the study, the day before the intervention, and one at the end of the study, the day after the intervention.
Occupational Performance
The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) is a general questionnaire based on a semistructured interview. The semistructured design allows individuals to identify important occupations that they have difficulty performing. COPM is derived from the Canadian Activity Performance Model, which defines occupational performance as the ability to organize, select, and perform meaningful occupations that are culturally defined and age-appropriate for taking care of oneself, enjoying life, building the economic fabric of society, and contributing to the social world. The fifth version of the COPM was published in 2014 and its Turkish adaptation has been made.
Both assessments will take 10 minutes each, one at the beginning of the study, the day before the intervention, and one at the end of the study, the day after the intervention.
Problematic Media Use
It was developed to determine problematic media use in children between the ages of 4 and 11. The items of the scale were created by taking into account the Internet Gaming Disorder criteria expressed in DSM V. The scale consists of a 27-item form. The scale is Likert-type and each item is scored between 1 (never) and 5 (always). The total score obtained from the Problematic Media Use Scale is calculated by averaging the scores obtained from all items. High scores obtained from the scale indicate problematic use. While the scale, which is filled out by parents considering the child's behavior, does not provide information on the problematic use of a specific media tool, it tries to determine the problematic use of visual media tools (such as phones, tablets, computers, televisions) in general, in other words, screen addiction.
Both assessments will take 5 minutes each, one at the beginning of the study, the day before the intervention, and one at the end of the study, the day after the intervention.
Occupational Profile
This assessment tool comprises 25 items organized into six sections. The initial five sections (volition, habituation, communication \& interaction skills, process skills, motor skills) evaluate the child's personal attributes and their influence on participation and performance in various activities. The final section investigates the impact of the environment on the child's capacity to engage in and perform these activities. A four-point ordinal scale is employed for scoring individual items, using the following codes: F = Facilitates A = Allows I = Inhibits R = Restricts participation Numerical values are assigned to each code, ranging from 4 to 0. Specifically, 'F' is assigned a value of 4, 'A' is 3, 'I' is 2, and 'R' is 1. The item scores are summed, yielding a maximum total score of 100 for the entire assessment. The minimum score is 25.
Both assessments will take 10 minutes each, one at the beginning of the study, the day before the intervention, and one at the end of the study, the day after the intervention.
Study Arms (2)
Intervention Group
EXPERIMENTALAll 20 children participating in the study are individuals who have more than 2 hours of screen time per day. The individuals in the study do not have any known diagnosis that affects their self-regulation skills. Both their families and themselves are participating in the study voluntarily. They are randomly divided into two groups of 10 people. Each arm consists of 10 individuals. This is an intervention program that will be applied to the individuals in this arm for 8 weeks regarding self-regulation skills. During these eight weeks, one session per week will be applied in groups and one session will be applied individually. The intervention will include sensory processing skills and executive function skills. In addition, awareness training was provided to the families of the participants in this arm about the effects and harms of screen addiction.
Control Group
OTHERAll 20 children participating in the study were individuals who had more than 2 hours of screen time per day. The individuals in the study did not have any known diagnosis that affected their self-regulation skills. Both their families and themselves participated in the study voluntarily. They were randomly divided into two groups of 10 people. Each arm consisted of 10 individuals. Awareness training was provided to the families of the participants in this arm about the effects and harms of screen addiction.
Interventions
The intervention includes both group and individual applications. It has a large occupation/activity pool that can be selected in a person-centered manner. The activities are focused on supporting and developing the areas of influence in the sensory processing skills of individuals or the areas in executive functions, and providing occupations that will replace the screen and shape life in children for the screen abuse. It shapes the will, habits and routines necessary for the child to prefer alternative activities instead of the screen. For this purpose, an intervention program has been shaped to ensure that the child gains in the areas of daily life activities, productivity activities and leisure activities with the right developing skills, the child's wishes, the family's wishes, social expectations. As far as we know, it is the first flood regulation intervention program applied to children with screen addiction from an occupational therapy perspective.
Family awareness training on the harms of screen addiction and prolonged exposure to the screen, as a one-time event.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Children between 48-59 months of age
- Who do not have any additional diagnosis
- Spend 2 hours or more on screens per day and
- Attend kindergarten will be included.
You may not qualify if:
- Have any diagnosed disorder that may cause sensory processing disorder or executive function disorder,
- Have any diagnosed disorder that may lead to limitation of occupational performance, or
- Individuals who have not attended kindergarten will not be included in the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Health Sciences University
Ankara, 06010, Turkey (TĂ¼rkiye)
Related Publications (25)
Argumosa-Villar L, Boada-Grau J, Vigil-Colet A. Exploratory investigation of theoretical predictors of nomophobia using the Mobile Phone Involvement Questionnaire (MPIQ). J Adolesc. 2017 Apr;56:127-135. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.02.003. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
PMID: 28231484BACKGROUNDCarswell A, McColl MA, Baptiste S, Law M, Polatajko H, Pollock N. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: a research and clinical literature review. Can J Occup Ther. 2004 Oct;71(4):210-22. doi: 10.1177/000841740407100406.
PMID: 15586853BACKGROUNDWennberg B, Janeslatt G, Gustafsson PA, Kjellberg A. Occupational performance goals and outcomes of time-related interventions for children with ADHD. Scand J Occup Ther. 2021 Feb;28(2):158-170. doi: 10.1080/11038128.2020.1820570. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
PMID: 32955952BACKGROUNDMathews, S. B., Mozolic-Staunton, B., Jefford, E., & Salehi, N. (2020). Canadian Occupational Performance Measure and early intervention: A scoping review. Journal of Occupational Therapy, Schools, & Early Intervention, 13(4), 353-373.
BACKGROUNDDadson P, Brown T, Stagnitti K. Relationship between screen-time and hand function, play and sensory processing in children without disabilities aged 4-7 years: A exploratory study. Aust Occup Ther J. 2020 Aug;67(4):297-308. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12650. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
PMID: 32003027BACKGROUNDKoziol LF, Budding DE, Chidekel D. Sensory integration, sensory processing, and sensory modulation disorders: putative functional neuroanatomic underpinnings. Cerebellum. 2011 Dec;10(4):770-92. doi: 10.1007/s12311-011-0288-8.
PMID: 21630084BACKGROUNDWang L, Wu L, Lin X, Zhang Y, Zhou H, Du X, Dong G. Altered brain functional networks in people with Internet gaming disorder: Evidence from resting-state fMRI. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging. 2016 Aug 30;254:156-63. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2016.07.001. Epub 2016 Jul 6.
PMID: 27447451BACKGROUNDBrand M, Young KS, Laier C, Wolfling K, Potenza MN. Integrating psychological and neurobiological considerations regarding the development and maintenance of specific Internet-use disorders: An Interaction of Person-Affect-Cognition-Execution (I-PACE) model. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016 Dec;71:252-266. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.08.033. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
PMID: 27590829BACKGROUNDTakeuchi H, Taki Y, Hashizume H, Asano K, Asano M, Sassa Y, Yokota S, Kotozaki Y, Nouchi R, Kawashima R. Impact of videogame play on the brain's microstructural properties: cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. Mol Psychiatry. 2016 Dec;21(12):1781-1789. doi: 10.1038/mp.2015.193. Epub 2016 Jan 5.
PMID: 26728566BACKGROUNDAtkin AJ, Sharp SJ, Corder K, van Sluijs EM; International Children's Accelerometry Database (ICAD) Collaborators. Prevalence and correlates of screen time in youth: an international perspective. Am J Prev Med. 2014 Dec;47(6):803-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.07.043. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
PMID: 25241193BACKGROUNDRasmussen M, Damsgaard MT, Morgen CS, Kierkegaard L, Toftager M, Rosenwein SV, Krolner RF, Due P, Holstein BE. Trends in social inequality in overweight and obesity among adolescents in Denmark 1998-2018. Int J Public Health. 2020 Jun;65(5):607-616. doi: 10.1007/s00038-020-01342-1. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
PMID: 32076738BACKGROUNDYang L, Cao C, Kantor ED, Nguyen LH, Zheng X, Park Y, Giovannucci EL, Matthews CE, Colditz GA, Cao Y. Trends in Sedentary Behavior Among the US Population, 2001-2016. JAMA. 2019 Apr 23;321(16):1587-1597. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.3636.
PMID: 31012934BACKGROUNDMagee CA, Lee JK, Vella SA. Bidirectional relationships between sleep duration and screen time in early childhood. JAMA Pediatr. 2014 May;168(5):465-70. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.4183.
PMID: 24589672BACKGROUNDReid Chassiakos YL, Radesky J, Christakis D, Moreno MA, Cross C; COUNCIL ON COMMUNICATIONS AND MEDIA. Children and Adolescents and Digital Media. Pediatrics. 2016 Nov;138(5):e20162593. doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-2593.
PMID: 27940795BACKGROUNDRadesky JS, Christakis DA. Increased Screen Time: Implications for Early Childhood Development and Behavior. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2016 Oct;63(5):827-39. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2016.06.006.
PMID: 27565361BACKGROUNDAmerican Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on Public Education. American Academy of Pediatrics: Children, adolescents, and television. Pediatrics. 2001 Feb;107(2):423-6. doi: 10.1542/peds.107.2.423.
PMID: 11158483BACKGROUNDLissak G. Adverse physiological and psychological effects of screen time on children and adolescents: Literature review and case study. Environ Res. 2018 Jul;164:149-157. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2018.01.015. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
PMID: 29499467BACKGROUNDRasmussen MGB, Pedersen J, Olesen LG, Brage S, Klakk H, Kristensen PL, Brond JC, Grontved A. Short-term efficacy of reducing screen media use on physical activity, sleep, and physiological stress in families with children aged 4-14: study protocol for the SCREENS randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2020 Mar 23;20(1):380. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8458-6.
PMID: 32293374BACKGROUNDTorpil B, Ekici Caglar G, Bumin G, Pekcetin S. Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM-TR) for People with Multiple Sclerosis. Occup Ther Health Care. 2021 Jul;35(3):306-317. doi: 10.1080/07380577.2021.1933673. Epub 2021 Jun 14.
PMID: 34126836BACKGROUNDBowyer, P., Lee, J., Kramer, J., Taylor, R.R., Kielhofner, G. (2012). Determining the clinical utility of the Short Child Occupational Profile (SCOPE). British Journal of Occupational, 75(1), 19.
BACKGROUNDDomoff SE, Harrison K, Gearhardt AN, Gentile DA, Lumeng JC, Miller AL. Development and Validation of the Problematic Media Use Measure: A Parent Report Measure of Screen Media "Addiction" in Children. Psychol Pop Media Cult. 2019 Jan;8(1):2-11. doi: 10.1037/ppm0000163. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
PMID: 30873299BACKGROUNDMcClelland MM, Cameron CE, Duncan R, Bowles RP, Acock AC, Miao A, Pratt ME. Predictors of early growth in academic achievement: the head-toes-knees-shoulders task. Front Psychol. 2014 Jun 17;5:599. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00599. eCollection 2014.
PMID: 25071619BACKGROUNDKayihan H, Akel BS, Salar S, Huri M, Karahan S, Turker D, Korkem D. DEVELOPMENT OF A TURKISH VERSION OF THE SENSORY PROFILE: TRANSLATION, CROSS-CULTURAL ADAPTATION, AND PSYCHOMETRIC VALIDATION. Percept Mot Skills. 2015 Jun;120(3):971-86. doi: 10.2466/08.27.PMS.120v17x8. Epub 2015 Jun 9.
PMID: 26057421BACKGROUNDKashefimehr B, Kayihan H, Huri M. The Effect of Sensory Integration Therapy on Occupational Performance in Children With Autism. OTJR (Thorofare N J). 2018 Apr;38(2):75-83. doi: 10.1177/1539449217743456. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
PMID: 29281930BACKGROUNDBowyer PL, Kramer J, Kielhofner G, Maziero-Barbosa V, Girolami G. Measurement properties of the Short Child Occupational Profile (SCOPE). Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2007;27(4):67-85.
PMID: 18032150BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PhD Lecturer
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 18, 2025
First Posted
June 4, 2025
Study Start
March 21, 2025
Primary Completion
April 1, 2025
Study Completion
June 30, 2025
Last Updated
June 6, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share