PECS-II vs ESP in Nociception Level Index Guided Breast Surgery

NCT07002541 | Recruiting

• 1 other identifier: 2024.424.IRB1.047
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 90
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

Background: Breast surgery is often associated with significant perioperative pain. While systemic opioids are commonly used, their side effects (nausea, vomiting, respiratory depression, delayed recovery) have encouraged the adoption of regional anesthesia techniques for better analgesia and reduced opioid requirements. PECS-II and Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) blocks are two effective regional techniques frequently utilized in breast surgery. However, comparative data on their impact on intraoperative opioid consumption under nociception-guided anesthesia remains limited. The Nociception Level Index (NOL) is an objective monitoring tool that integrates multiple physiological signals (e.g., heart rate variability, skin conductance, pulse amplitude) to assess nociceptive responses in real-time. When used intraoperatively, it enables more precise opioid titration, potentially optimizing analgesia while minimizing opioid exposure. Objective: To compare the efficacy of PECS-II and ESP blocks in reducing intraoperative remifentanil consumption during breast surgery under general anesthesia guided by NOL monitoring. Methods: This prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted at Koç University Hospital following ethical approval. Ninety female patients aged 18-80 years, classified as ASA I-III and scheduled for elective mastectomy or other breast surgeries, were randomly assigned into three groups (n=30 each): Group 1 (PECS-II Block) Group 2 (ESP Block) Group 3 (Control - no block) Regional blocks were performed before surgery with ultrasound guidance. PECS-II block was administered at the 3rd to 5th rib levels in the mid-axillary line using 30 mL of 0.3% bupivacaine. ESP block was applied at T2-T5 levels with a total of 20 mL 0.5% bupivacaine. All patients received standardized general anesthesia, including propofol, fentanyl, rocuronium, and desflurane maintenance. Remifentanil infusion (0.05-0.1 μg/kg/min) was titrated based on NOL values every 5 minutes: increased by 0.03 μg/kg/min if NOL \>25, and decreased by 0.03 μg/kg/min if NOL \<10. Data collected included: Total intraoperative remifentanil consumption (primary outcome) NOL scores every 5 minutes Postoperative pain scores (NRS) at 1st, 6th, 12th, and 24th hours (at rest and with arm abduction) Total opioid consumption (morphine, tramadol) in the first 24 hours Opioid-related side effects (nausea, vomiting, pruritus) Length of hospital stay Blinding was applied to data collectors (pain nurses and anesthesia technicians), but due to the nature of the procedures, surgeons and anesthesiologists were not blinded. Statistical Analysis: Data were analyzed using SPSS v26. Continuous variables were tested for normality (Shapiro-Wilk), and analyzed with t-tests or Mann-Whitney U as appropriate. Categorical variables were compared using Chi-square tests. Significance was set at p\<0.05. Expected Outcomes and Contribution: It is hypothesized that both PECS-II and ESP blocks will significantly reduce intraoperative remifentanil consumption compared to the control group. Furthermore, these blocks may improve postoperative pain control, reduce opioid-related side effects, and shorten recovery time. This study aims to clarify the relative efficacy of two widely used regional blocks in the context of objective, nociception-guided anesthesia. The findings are expected to support evidence-based use of regional techniques in breast surgery and contribute to the growing body of literature emphasizing opioid-sparing strategies in perioperative care.

Conditions

Intraoperative Pain; Postoperative Pain

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• intraoperative remifentanyl consumption

  The time frame for intraoperative remifentanil consumption refers to the entire duration of the surgical procedure, starting from skin incision to the end of surgery (skin closure).

Study Arms (3)

PECS-II group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Procedure: PECS II block

ESP group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Procedure: ESP block

Control group

NO INTERVENTION

Interventions

PECS II block PROCEDURE

The PECS-II block is an ultrasound-guided interfascial plane block designed to provide analgesia for surgeries involving the anterolateral chest wall, particularly breast surgery. It is an extension of the PECS-I block, which targets the medial and lateral pectoral nerves. In the PECS-II technique, a high-frequency linear ultrasound probe is used to identify the fascial planes. A 22G, 50 mm regional block needle is advanced in-plane under sterile conditions. A total of 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine is administered: 10 mL is injected between the pectoralis major and minor muscles (targeting the pectoral nerves), and 20 mL between the pectoralis minor and serratus anterior muscles (to block the lateral branches of intercostal nerves and intercostobrachial nerve).

PECS-II group

ESP block PROCEDURE

The erector spinae plane (ESP) block is a fascial plane block performed under ultrasound guidance to provide multimodal analgesia for thoracic and abdominal surgeries, including breast procedures. In this technique, a high-frequency linear ultrasound probe is used to visualize the transverse process of the thoracic vertebra, typically at the T4-T5 level. With the patient in a seated position and under standard sterile conditions, a 22G, 50 mm regional block needle is inserted in-plane until the tip reaches the fascial plane between the erector spinae muscle and the transverse process. After negative aspiration, 1-2 mL of test dose is injected to confirm correct needle placement by observing separation of fascial layers. Then, 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine is injected incrementally.

ESP group

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 18 Years - 80 Years
• Sex: female
• Healthy Volunteers: No
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

• Female patients aged 18 to 80 years ASA Physical Status Classification I-III
• Scheduled for elective unilateral or bilateral breast surgery, including one or more of the following:
• Lumpectomy with axillary lymph node biopsy or dissection Breast reconstruction Breast reduction Mastopexy Implant expander removal or placement

You may not qualify if:

• Morbid obesity (BMI \> 40 kg/m²) Presence of non-sinus cardiac rhythm Chronic opioid use (defined as daily use for \>2 weeks in the last month or total use \>4 weeks) History of opioid abuse or dependence Comorbidities causing moderate to severe functional limitation Inability to communicate with study personnel or follow instructions Pregnancy or breastfeeding Known allergy or hypersensitivity to bupivacaine or any study-related medication

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Koç University: lead

Study Sites (1)

Koc University

Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain, Postoperative

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Postoperative Complications; Pathologic Processes; Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms; Pain; Neurologic Manifestations; Signs and Symptoms

Central Study Contacts

Ilayda Kalyoncu Karahan, MD

CONTACT

+905325105014; ilaydaakalyoncu@gmail.com

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: TRIPLE
• Who Masked: PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
• Purpose: PREVENTION
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: Associate professor

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: May 7, 2025
• First Posted: June 3, 2025
• Study Start: December 1, 2024
• Primary Completion: June 1, 2025
• Study Completion: June 30, 2025
• Last Updated: June 3, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-05

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will share

Locations

TU (1)