NCT07002411

Brief Summary

The HOSPER project aims to determine if using Pepper and NAO social robots at the IRCCS INRCA in Ancona's (Italy) entrance is a viable way to improve the current reception and guidance services for hospital visitors. The robots will offer proactive assistance and directions to departments.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
200

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2024

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 18, 2024

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 14, 2025

Completed
20 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 3, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 30, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 30, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

June 3, 2025

Status Verified

May 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

May 14, 2025

Last Update Submit

May 23, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Older people

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • perceived quality of the innovative reception service

    The perceived quality will be evaluated by an ad hoc Customer Satisfaction questionnaire. The definition of this indicator is evaluated by quantifying several variables, including: the attention received from the robot in terms of accuracy of the interaction and courtesy (score from 1 - not at all satisfied - to 7 - very satisfied), the clarity and completeness of the information received (score from 1 - not at all satisfied - to 7 - very satisfied), the respect for personal privacy (score from 1 - not at all satisfied - to 7 - very satisfied), the overall satisfaction with the service provided (score from 1 - not at all satisfied - to 7 - very satisfied), and whether the service would be recommended to others (score from 1 - absolutely not - to 7 - definitely yes).

    immediately after the intervention

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Usability

    immediately after the intervention

Study Arms (2)

ARM 1

EXPERIMENTAL

Older subjects attending the INRCA hospital entrance

Other: Innovative hospital reception service with social robot NAO

ARM 2

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Older subjects attending the INRCA hospital entrance

Other: Innovative hospital reception service with social robot PEPPER

Interventions

The robot NAO welcomes the user and asks how it can assist them. At this point, the user responds, and the robot, in turn, replies in two possible ways: If it has not understood the request, it prompts the user to rephrase it, and the process returns to the previous point. If it has understood the request, it explains the route the user needs to follow. Once the interaction has been successful or two consecutive attempts have failed, the robot asks the user if the necessary information has been provided. If yes, the robot dismisses the user. If no, the interaction resumes from the point where the robot asks for the department to reach or the exam to take.

ARM 1

The robot PEPPER welcomes the user and asks how it can assist them, stating the following phrase: "Good morning and welcome to INRCA. I am PEPPER and I am here to provide directions to help you reach your desired location within the hospital. Which department do you need to reach or which exam do you need to take? " At this point, the user responds, and the robot, in turn, replies in two possible ways: If it has not understood the request, it prompts the user to rephrase it, and the process returns to the previous point. If it has understood the request, it explains the route the user needs to follow. Once the interaction has been successful or two consecutive attempts have failed, the robot asks the user if the necessary information has been provided. If yes, the robot dismisses the user as follows: "Thank you for your participation. Have a good day." If no, the interaction resumes from the point where the robot asks for the department to reach or the exam to take.

ARM 2

Eligibility Criteria

Age65 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsOlder Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Possession of full cognitive capacity;

You may not qualify if:

  • Lack of written informed consent

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

IRCCS INRCA Hospital

Ancona, 60127, Italy

RECRUITING

Study Officials

  • Letizia Ferrara, MD

    IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Anna Rita Bonfigli

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 14, 2025

First Posted

June 3, 2025

Study Start

December 18, 2024

Primary Completion

July 30, 2025

Study Completion

July 30, 2025

Last Updated

June 3, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations