Hospitality Oriented Service Perception Evolution With Robots (HOSPER)
HOSPER
1 other identifier
interventional
200
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The HOSPER project aims to determine if using Pepper and NAO social robots at the IRCCS INRCA in Ancona's (Italy) entrance is a viable way to improve the current reception and guidance services for hospital visitors. The robots will offer proactive assistance and directions to departments.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Dec 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 18, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 14, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 3, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 30, 2025
CompletedJune 3, 2025
May 1, 2025
7 months
May 14, 2025
May 23, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
perceived quality of the innovative reception service
The perceived quality will be evaluated by an ad hoc Customer Satisfaction questionnaire. The definition of this indicator is evaluated by quantifying several variables, including: the attention received from the robot in terms of accuracy of the interaction and courtesy (score from 1 - not at all satisfied - to 7 - very satisfied), the clarity and completeness of the information received (score from 1 - not at all satisfied - to 7 - very satisfied), the respect for personal privacy (score from 1 - not at all satisfied - to 7 - very satisfied), the overall satisfaction with the service provided (score from 1 - not at all satisfied - to 7 - very satisfied), and whether the service would be recommended to others (score from 1 - absolutely not - to 7 - definitely yes).
immediately after the intervention
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Usability
immediately after the intervention
Study Arms (2)
ARM 1
EXPERIMENTALOlder subjects attending the INRCA hospital entrance
ARM 2
ACTIVE COMPARATOROlder subjects attending the INRCA hospital entrance
Interventions
The robot NAO welcomes the user and asks how it can assist them. At this point, the user responds, and the robot, in turn, replies in two possible ways: If it has not understood the request, it prompts the user to rephrase it, and the process returns to the previous point. If it has understood the request, it explains the route the user needs to follow. Once the interaction has been successful or two consecutive attempts have failed, the robot asks the user if the necessary information has been provided. If yes, the robot dismisses the user. If no, the interaction resumes from the point where the robot asks for the department to reach or the exam to take.
The robot PEPPER welcomes the user and asks how it can assist them, stating the following phrase: "Good morning and welcome to INRCA. I am PEPPER and I am here to provide directions to help you reach your desired location within the hospital. Which department do you need to reach or which exam do you need to take? " At this point, the user responds, and the robot, in turn, replies in two possible ways: If it has not understood the request, it prompts the user to rephrase it, and the process returns to the previous point. If it has understood the request, it explains the route the user needs to follow. Once the interaction has been successful or two consecutive attempts have failed, the robot asks the user if the necessary information has been provided. If yes, the robot dismisses the user as follows: "Thank you for your participation. Have a good day." If no, the interaction resumes from the point where the robot asks for the department to reach or the exam to take.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Possession of full cognitive capacity;
You may not qualify if:
- Lack of written informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
IRCCS INRCA Hospital
Ancona, 60127, Italy
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Letizia Ferrara, MD
IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 14, 2025
First Posted
June 3, 2025
Study Start
December 18, 2024
Primary Completion
July 30, 2025
Study Completion
July 30, 2025
Last Updated
June 3, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share