Wide-Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet (WALANT) With Versus Without Hyaluronidase for Hand Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The WALANT (Wide Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet) method, introduced by Dr. Donald H. Lalonde over a decade ago, has gained popularity due to its favorable outcomes and patient satisfaction. This technique involves injecting diluted lidocaine and epinephrine, which helps control pain and bleeding without the discomfort of a tourniquet. This research will explore the use of hyaluronidase to enhance the WALANT technique. The study hypothesize that adding hyaluronidase would improve the onset speed and duration of pain control. A double-blinded study involving 100 patients compared WALANT with hyaluronidase (Group A) to WALANT without Hyaluronidase (Group B).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Jun 2025
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 23, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 31, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 20, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2025
CompletedJuly 29, 2025
July 1, 2025
6 months
May 23, 2025
July 24, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Onset time of analgesia.
time to start analgesia
from time of drug injection to start time of analgesia
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Duration of postoperative analgesia
from onset time of analgesia to end of analgesia time postoperatively
Pain intensity
from start of pain postoperatively till the end of first 24 hours postoperatively
The amount of morphine used
From start of postoperative pain to end of first 24 hours postoperatively
Amount of bleeding
From start of surgery to end of sugery
Patient satisfaction
From start of anesthesia till the end of first 24 hours postoperatively
Study Arms (2)
Group A (n=50): WALANT with Hyaluronidase
EXPERIMENTALPatients received a mixture of hyaluronidase 15 IU to every 1 ml lidocaine 1% mixture (a solution composed of epinephrine 1:200,000 and lidocaine 1%). Buffered to reduce injection pain by 1 ml of sodium bicarbonate 8.4% for every 10 ml of the local anesthetic mixture.
Group B (n=50): WALANT without Hyaluronidase:
ACTIVE COMPARATORA mixture of epinephrine 1:200,000 and lidocaine 1% buffered to reduce injection pain by 1 ml of sodium bicarbonate 8.4% for every 10 ml of the local anesthetic mixture.
Interventions
in group A hyaluronidase is expected to shorten the onset of action and prolong the duration of action of lidocaine 1% mixture than in group B where lidocaine 1% mixture only will be given
lidocaine 1 % mixture includes; A mixture of ( epinephrine 1:200,000 and lidocaine 1% ) buffered by 1 ml of sodium bicarbonate 8.4% for every 10 ml of the local anesthetic mixture.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- One hundred individuals scheduled for hand surgery
- between the ages of 18 and 60 years old,
- of both sexes
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I or II.
- were randomized 1:1 to either Group A; (Receiving WALANT with hyaluronidase) or Group B; (Receiving WALANT without hyaluronidase).
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant women,
- patients who refused the terms of the research consent statement,
- psychiatric illness,
- uncooperative patient,
- patients with history of allergy to local anesthetic drugs,
- cardiac arrhythmia,
- patients with bleeding tendency,
- patients with low flow finger perfusion state such as Burger disease and Raynaud's disease,
- patients with connective tissue disease such as Scleroderma
- suspicious disease with malignancy and hand infection
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Misr University for Science and Technology
Giza, Giza Governorate, 15525, Egypt
Related Publications (3)
Farzam R, Deilami M, Jalili S, Kamali K. Comparison of Anesthesia Results between Wide Awake Local Anesthesia no Tourniquet (WALANT) and Forearm Tourniquet Bier Block in Hand Surgeries: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2021 Jan;9(1):116-121. doi: 10.22038/abjs.2020.49526.2487.
PMID: 33778124BACKGROUNDO'Neill N, Abdall-Razak A, Norton E, Kumar A, Shah H, Khatkar H, Alsafi Z, Agha R. Use of Wide-Awake Local Anaesthetic No Tourniquet (WALANT) in upper limb and hand surgery: A systematic review protocol. Int J Surg Protoc. 2020 Mar 13;20:8-12. doi: 10.1016/j.isjp.2020.03.001. eCollection 2020.
PMID: 32258835BACKGROUNDSeretis K, Boptsi A, Boptsi E, Lykoudis EG. The Efficacy of Wide-Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet (WALANT) in Common Plastic Surgery Operations Performed on the Upper Limbs: A Case-Control Study. Life (Basel). 2023 Feb 4;13(2):442. doi: 10.3390/life13020442.
PMID: 36836799BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Mohammed Hani Kamal, Prof.
Anesth.&pain
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Mohammed Safwat Hamza, Ass. prof.
Orthopedics
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- All the above selected are blind regarding the used technique of anesthesia
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Lecturer of anesthesia& pain
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 23, 2025
First Posted
May 31, 2025
Study Start
June 20, 2025
Primary Completion
December 31, 2025
Study Completion
December 31, 2025
Last Updated
July 29, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR
- Time Frame
- After 5 months from today and wil be available for one year
- Access Criteria
- Researchers: Who: Academic researchers, industry scientists, and regulatory agencies. What: Full IPD, including demographic data, treatment assignments, and outcome measures. How: Through data sharing platforms or repositories after submitting a research proposal and obtaining necessary approvals. Regulatory Authorities: Who: Agencies like the FDA or EMA. What: Full IPD and supporting documentation for oversight and review. How: Direct access during the review process of clinical trial applications. Data Sharing Initiatives: Who: Collaborating institutions and consortia. What: Aggregated or anonymized IPD for meta-analyses or systematic reviews. How: Via established partnerships and shared databases. Public and Patient Advocacy Groups: Who: Organizations seeking to promote transparency. What: Summary data and aggregated results, but not individual-level data. How: Through publicly available reports or dashboards.
Demographic Information: Age, sex, race, and other relevant demographic details. Baseline Characteristics: Health status, medical history, and any pre-existing conditions prior to the trial. Treatment Assignment: Information on the intervention or treatment each participant received. Outcome Measures: Data on primary and secondary outcomes as defined in the trial protocol. Adverse Events: Reports of any side effects or adverse events experienced by participants during the trial. Follow-up Data: Information collected during follow-up periods, including long-term outcomes.