NCT06997991

Brief Summary

The objective of this interventional study is the Change in the Michigan Hand Questionnaire (MHQ) score over time in subjects with Eaton Littler grade II and III trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis. The main questions to be answered are:

  • primary outcomes: Differences in the change in the MHQ scale measured as a reduction in the score result of 12 points within 6 months from preoperative.
  • secondary outcomes: Change from baseline in hand function measured by grip strength (Gripstrength); Change from baseline in hand function by lateral grip strength (tippinch and tripodpinch); Change in the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain scale before the procedure then after the procedure, at 1, 3 and 6 months; Safety and tolerance of the treatments.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
25

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2022

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 26, 2022

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2023

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 22, 2025

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 31, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

May 31, 2025

Status Verified

May 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1.1 years

First QC Date

May 22, 2025

Last Update Submit

May 22, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

adipose stem cellsRigenera protocoltrapeziometacarpal arthritismicrofragmented adipose tissue

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in hand and upper limb function measured by the Michigan Hand questionnaire

    The Michigan Hand Questionnaire (MHQ) is a validated instrument specifically designed to assess hand function and the impact of upper extremity conditions on quality of life. The questionnaire explores six main dimensions: general function, activities of daily living (ADL), pain, aesthetics, patient satisfaction, and work function. The score for each domain is converted to a scale of 0 to 100, where: 100 represents the best perceived functional outcome, 0 represents the worst outcome. For some subsections (such as pain), the scale is reversed to ensure correct interpretation of the scores.

    The MHQ will be administered at three key time points: before treatment, 3 months, and 6 months after the therapeutic intervention, in order to monitor clinical progress and treatment effectiveness.

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Evaluation of: 1. Change from baseline in hand function measured by grip strength 2. Change from baseline in hand function measured by lateral grip strength (tip pinch and tripod pinch) 3. Change in visual analogue scale of pain (VAS) over time 4.Safety

    Three key time points: before treatment, 3 months, and 6 months after the therapeutic intervention.

Study Arms (1)

Adipose micro-grafts

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients were positioned supine, and local anesthesia was administered. A small incision was made to introduce a blunt cannula attached to a Luer-lock 60-cc syringe. Klein sterile solution, containing saline and lidocaine, was injected into the subcutaneous fat layer of either the abdominal or thigh region. Subsequently, approximately 30 mL of adipose tissue was extracted. The collected lipoaspirate was processed under sterile conditions in a closed system using Rigenera® technology (HBW, Turin, Italy). Before injecting, the skin was sterilely dressed, and the injection of 2-3 mL of aMAT was performed into TMC joint with a superolateral approach, under fluoroscopic X-ray guidance and using a disposable 20G needle and a 3 mL Luer-Lock Syringe.

Procedure: adipose micro-grafts injection

Interventions

Patients were positioned supine, and local anesthesia was administered. A small incision was made to introduce a blunt cannula attached to a Luer-lock 60-cc syringe. Klein sterile solution, containing saline and lidocaine, was injected into the subcutaneous fat layer of either the abdominal or thigh region. Subsequently, approximately 30 mL of adipose tissue was extracted. The collected lipoaspirate was processed under sterile conditions in a closed system using Rigenera® technology (HBW, Turin, Italy). Before injecting, the skin was sterilely dressed, and the injection of 2-3 mL of aMAT was performed into TMC joint with a superolateral approach, under fluoroscopic X-ray guidance and using a disposable 20G needle and a 3 mL Luer-Lock Syringe.

Adipose micro-grafts

Eligibility Criteria

Age40 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Signed written informed consent.
  • Male or female aged ≥ 40 and ≤ 75 years
  • Normal axial alignment
  • Eaton/Littler stage 2-3
  • MHQ pain scale
  • Willingness to participate in all scheduled follow-ups
  • Willingness to abstain from taking level 2 analgesics and opioids for the duration of the study. NSAIDs and Paracetamol are permitted.

You may not qualify if:

  • Pregnant and/or breastfeeding women.
  • If a woman, of childbearing age and the subject is not using a highly effective method of birth control and is not willing to use it during participation in the clinical trial. Highly effective methods of birth control include: combined hormonal contraception (containing estrogen and progestin) combined with ovulation inhibition (oral, intravaginal, transdermal); progestin-only hormonal contraception combined with ovulation inhibition (oral, injectable, implantable); intrauterine device (IUD); intrauterine hormone-releasing system (IUS); bilateral tubal occlusion; vasectomized partner; sexual abstinence;
  • Intra-articular injection within 3 months of treatment.
  • Immunocompromised for reasons such as corticosteroid therapy, chemotherapy, antiangiogenic or immunosuppressive agents, or due to immunodeficiency syndromes
  • Previous hand surgery within the last 6 months
  • History of connective tissue disease, such as systemic lupus erythematosus, systemic sclerosis, Sjögren's syndrome or mixed connective tissue disease
  • Infections in the trapezium-metacarpal joint, skin disease or infections in the area of the injection site

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti

Ancona, Italy

Location

Related Publications (7)

  • Mayoly A, Witters M, Jouve E, Bec C, Iniesta A, Kachouh N, Veran J, Grimaud F, Zavarro AC, Fernandez R, Bendahan D, Giraudo L, Dumoulin C, Chagnaud C, Casanova D, Sabatier F, Legre R, Jaloux C, Magalon J. Intra Articular Injection of Autologous Microfat and Platelets-Rich Plasma in the Treatment of Wrist Osteoarthritis: A Pilot Study. J Clin Med. 2022 Sep 29;11(19):5786. doi: 10.3390/jcm11195786.

    PMID: 36233654BACKGROUND
  • Erne HC, Cerny MK, Ehrl D, Bauer AT, Schmauss V, Moog P, Broer PN, Loew S, Schmauss D. Autologous Fat Injection versus Lundborg Resection Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Trapeziometacarpal Joint Osteoarthritis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Jan;141(1):119-124. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003913.

    PMID: 28922320BACKGROUND
  • Cook GS, Lalonde DH. MOC-PSSM CME article: Management of thumb carpometacarpal joint arthritis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008 Jan;121(1 Suppl):1-9. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000294708.70340.8c.

    PMID: 18182958BACKGROUND
  • De Francesco F, Gravina P, Busato A, Farinelli L, Soranzo C, Vidal L, Zingaretti N, Zavan B, Sbarbati A, Riccio M, Gigante A. Stem Cells in Autologous Microfragmented Adipose Tissue: Current Perspectives in Osteoarthritis Disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Sep 22;22(19):10197. doi: 10.3390/ijms221910197.

    PMID: 34638538BACKGROUND
  • Kolasinski SL, Neogi T, Hochberg MC, Oatis C, Guyatt G, Block J, Callahan L, Copenhaver C, Dodge C, Felson D, Gellar K, Harvey WF, Hawker G, Herzig E, Kwoh CK, Nelson AE, Samuels J, Scanzello C, White D, Wise B, Altman RD, DiRenzo D, Fontanarosa J, Giradi G, Ishimori M, Misra D, Shah AA, Shmagel AK, Thoma LM, Turgunbaev M, Turner AS, Reston J. 2019 American College of Rheumatology/Arthritis Foundation Guideline for the Management of Osteoarthritis of the Hand, Hip, and Knee. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020 Feb;72(2):220-233. doi: 10.1002/art.41142. Epub 2020 Jan 6.

    PMID: 31908163BACKGROUND
  • Zhang W, Moskowitz RW, Nuki G, Abramson S, Altman RD, Arden N, Bierma-Zeinstra S, Brandt KD, Croft P, Doherty M, Dougados M, Hochberg M, Hunter DJ, Kwoh K, Lohmander LS, Tugwell P. OARSI recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis, Part II: OARSI evidence-based, expert consensus guidelines. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2008 Feb;16(2):137-62. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2007.12.013.

    PMID: 18279766BACKGROUND
  • Farinelli L, Riccio M, Gigante A, De Francesco F. Pain Management Strategies in Osteoarthritis. Biomedicines. 2024 Apr 4;12(4):805. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12040805.

    PMID: 38672160BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ArthritisJoint DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesRheumatic Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Director Dpt Reconstructive and Hand Surgery

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 22, 2025

First Posted

May 31, 2025

Study Start

July 26, 2022

Primary Completion

September 1, 2023

Study Completion

September 1, 2023

Last Updated

May 31, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-05

Locations