Clinical Utility of a PCR Compared to Culture and Sensitivity Testing for the Management of cUTI in Adults.
PCR
Clinical Validity and Utility of PCR Compared to Conventional Culture and Sensitivity Testing for the Management of Complicated Urinary Tract Infections in Adults.
1 other identifier
interventional
773
1 country
6
Brief Summary
Complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) often lead to the overuse of empiric antibiotics, risking inappropriate treatment and contributing to antimicrobial resistance. This randomized, multi-center, investigator-blinded clinical trial is the first global head-to-head comparison of molecular diagnostic testing (Polymerase Chain Reaction : PCR) versus conventional culture and sensitivity (C\&S) for managing cUTIs in adults. Conducted across six U.S. clinical sites, the study aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of PCR-guided treatment relative to C\&S-guided care. Eligible adult patients were randomized 1:1 into two diagnostic arms-PCR or C\&S-after providing informed consent. Urine samples were collected before randomization, tested by both methods, but clinicians remained blinded to the comparator results to avoid bias. Treatment decisions were based only on the assigned test results. Urine was collected at baseline (Day 1) and at end-of-study (Day 28). Samples were processed centrally: the PCR method (DocLab UTM 2.0) detected 28 uropathogens and 16 antibiotic resistance gene classes; C\&S testing quantified bacterial loads and assessed antimicrobial susceptibility using standard thresholds (≥10⁵ CFU/mL). The primary endpoint was the number of patients in each arm achieving a Favorable Clinical Outcome (FCl) at Day 28, defined as either:
- Clinical Cure (complete symptom resolution requiring no further antibiotics), or
- Clinical Improvement (partial symptom resolution without new symptoms or IV antibiotics). Secondary endpoints included:
- Microbiological eradication at EOS (via C\&S and PCR).
- Clinician satisfaction with diagnostic usefulness and result clarity.
- Turnaround time comparison between PCR and C\&S.
- Concordance analysis of test results between PCR and C\&S.
- FCl rates in discordant cases, where PCR and C\&S results disagreed.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jul 2023
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
6 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 31, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 31, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 21, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 30, 2025
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 11, 2025
CompletedSeptember 11, 2025
July 1, 2025
9 months
May 21, 2025
May 30, 2025
August 21, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Favorable Clinical Outcomes (FCl)
The number (and percentage) of subjects in each study arm with favorable clinical outcomes (FCl) at the EOS visit. The FCl was defined as a patient's clinical response, assessed by the treating investigator, indicating either clinical improvement or cure. Clinical improvement was defined as the resolution of at least one symptom of cUTI present at baseline, absence of new cUTI symptoms, and/or avoidance of parenteral antibiotic therapy following randomization. Clinical cure was defined as the complete resolution of all acute signs and symptoms of cUTI present at baseline, to the extent that no further antimicrobial therapy (either IV or oral) was required for the treatment of the cUTI.
at End Of Study (EOS) visit (Day 28)
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Microbiological Eradication
at End Of Study (EOS) visit (Day 28)
Treating Investigator Satisfaction Score
at End Of Study (EOS) visit (Day 28)
Turnaround Time
at End Of Study (EOS) visit (Day 28)
Overall Agreeability
at End Of Study (EOS) visit (Day 28)
Favorable Clinical Outcome of Patients With Discordant Results
at End Of Study (EOS) visit (Day 28)
Study Arms (2)
PCR Arm
OTHERTreatment guided by the PCR results
C&S Arm
OTHERTreatment guided by the C\&S results
Interventions
Patients receive treatment prescribed by a blinded clinician, based solely on the PCR diagnostic results
Patients receive treatment prescribed by a blinded investigator (clinician), based solely on the C\&S diagnostic results.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- I1. At least 18 years of age at the time of consent
- I2. Presenting at least two of the following new, persistent or worsening cUTI signs and symptoms at screening visit: a) fever (temperature \>38 degrees Celsius or \>100.4 degrees Fahrenheit), hypothermia (temperature \<35.5 degrees Celsius or \<95.9 degrees Fahrenheit), rigors, or chills b) dysuria, urinary frequency, urgency, or hematuria c) suprapubic pain or pelvic pain d) costovertebral angle (CVA) tenderness e) nausea or vomiting f) radiographic evidence of pyelonephritis g) leukocytosis
- I3. Urine specimen with evidence of pyuria a) dipstick analysis positive for nitrite and/or leukocyte esterase, or; b) ≥10 white blood cells (WBCs) per cubic millimeter \[mm3\], or; c) ≥10 WBCs per high power field (hpf), or; d) clinically suspected pyuria (e.g. change in urine color, sediment in urine, or foul-smelling urine)
- I4. Having cUTI that requires microbiological diagnosis and treatment as suspected by the Investigator
- I5. Presenting active UTI that failed to resolve on first-line therapy or identified as a high-risk\* patient population; \*High-risk patient population include those who are elderly (≥65years), male, pregnant, having recurrent UTI (≥3/year), with underlying co-morbidities (e.g. diabetes, immunosuppression, or CKD), or with known functional and anatomical abnormalities of the urinary tract (e.g. stones, stents, recent instrumentation, indwelling catheters, neurogenic bladder, or PKD)
- I6. Able to provide at least 8 mL urine at visit 1 and 3
- I7. Willing to abstain from sexual intercourse or use condoms during any sexual contact until the End-of-Study (EOS) visit is complete
- I8. Willing to comply with protocol requirements, including availability for follow-up for the duration of the study
You may not qualify if:
- E1. Unable or unwilling to provide written informed consent
- E2. Unable to read and write in English (surveys are not available or validated in any other language than English)
- E3. Currently participating in or has participated in an interventional clinical trial with an investigational product or device within 30 days prior to the Screening Visit
- E4. Currently on or chronic use of any antibiotics for any clinical indication, other than UTI
- E5. Receipt of any dose of a potentially therapeutic oral or systemic antibiotics for the treatment of UTI within 48 hours before the study baseline urine is obtained
- E6.Pregnant women with known fetal congenital anomaly (e.g., genetic abnormality or major congenital malformation) based on antenatal ultrasound
- E7. Any rapidly progressing disease or immediately life-threatening illness, including acute hepatic failure, or respiratory failure
- E8. Medical condition or other factor that in the judgment of the investigator might affect ability to comply with procedures
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Doc Lab Inclead
- Dicentra Inc.collaborator
Study Sites (6)
Silicon Valley Medical Development
San Jose, California, 95124, United States
Albany Urology Clinic & Surgery Center
Albany, Georgia, 31707, United States
Augusta Urology Associates
Evans, Georgia, 30809, United States
Colquitt Regional Medical Center
Moultrie, Georgia, 31768, United States
Phoenix Urology of St Joseph
Saint Joseph, Missouri, 64506, United States
Norman Urology Associates
Norman, Oklahoma, 73071, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Roel Chavez
- Organization
- Doc Lab Inc
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Roel Chavez
Doc Lab Inc
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Thomas K Huard, PhD
MED-US Consulting, LLC
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 21, 2025
First Posted
May 30, 2025
Study Start
July 31, 2023
Primary Completion
April 30, 2024
Study Completion
May 31, 2024
Last Updated
September 11, 2025
Results First Posted
September 11, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share