Combined Therapy for Cervical Disc Herniation
A Study on the Treatment of Cervical Disc Herniation by Low-temperature Plasma Radiofrequency Ablation Combined With Ozone Injection and Collagenase
1 other identifier
interventional
90
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study mainly explores the efficacy and safety of low-temperature plasma radiofrequency ablation combined with ozone injection and collagenase in the treatment of cervical disc herniation.The primary outcomes included the collection of clinical data for all patients, such as gender, age, surgical segment, preoperative scores, and VAS and JOA scores at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively, as well as a comparison of adverse reaction rates between the two groups. The secondary outcomes involved evaluating clinical efficacy at 1 month and 6 months after surgery using the modified Macnab criteria.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2023
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 10, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 29, 2025
CompletedMay 29, 2025
May 1, 2025
1 year
May 10, 2025
May 28, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively, as well as a comparison of adverse reaction rates between the two groups.
The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score is a psychometric tool used to measure subjective experiences such as pain, anxiety, or satisfaction. The following is a detailed description of the meanings represented by specific numerical values in the VAS score, typically converted to a 0-10 numerical scale for clinical use: 0: Represents the complete absence of the measured sensation (e.g., pain) 1-2: Very mild level. Sensation is barely noticeable and does not interfere with daily activities. 3: Mild but distinct sensation. Noticeable enough to be recognized but still easily ignored or managed. Moderate level. 4-6: Moderate level. Sensation is clearly present and affects daily activities to some extent, but remains tolerable. 7-9: Severe level. Sensation dominates attention and drastically limits functionality; immediate intervention may be needed. 10: Maximal/intolerable level. Sensation is beyond endurance, rendering the individual unable to perform any normal activities.
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
evaluating clinical efficacy at 1 month and 6 months after surgery using the modified Macnab criteria
6 months
Study Arms (2)
Study Group
EXPERIMENTALThe study group received low-temperature plasma radiofrequency ablation and ozone injection as the control group, with the addition of collagenase injection into the epidural space.
Control Group
EXPERIMENTALThe control group underwent low-temperature plasma radiofrequency ablation combined with ozone injection.
Interventions
The "Collagenase injection into the epidural space" is a medical procedure for treating cervical disc herniation. Firstly, the patient is positioned, and the specific location of the epidural space at the affected cervical spine segment is accurately identified with the guidance of imaging devices like fluoroscopy or CT. After local anesthesia, a special puncture needle is inserted into the epidural space following the marked path. Once the needle is in the correct position, an appropriate amount of collagenase solution is slowly injected. After the operation, the patient needs to stay in the hospital for observation to monitor vital signs and neurological conditions. The patient should rest in bed for a certain period and then gradually engage in proper activities. Additionally, personalized rehabilitation treatment plans, including physical therapy and exercise, are usually required to help with recovery.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients must be diagnosed with cervical disc herniation through MRI or CT, with single-level disc protrusion (C3-C7) that occupies ≤1/3 of the central spinal canal.
- Aged between 30 and 80 years.
- Have suffered from persistent neck/shoulder pain or upper extremity radiating pain for ≥3 months.
- The pain does not respond to conventional treatments, including traction, massage, and oral medications.
- Be willing to undergo surgery therapy.
- Have no prior cervical spine surgery.
You may not qualify if:
- Cervical instability, myelopathic spondylosis, severe spinal stenosis (canal occupancy \>1/3), or ligament calcification.
- Severe osteoporosis (T-score \<-2.5).
- Extruded or sequestered disc herniation
- Coagulation disorders or active infections
- Cervical deformities, tumors, or a history of cervical spine surgery
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Nanchong Central Hospital
Nanchong, Sichuan, 637000, China
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 10, 2025
First Posted
May 29, 2025
Study Start
June 1, 2023
Primary Completion
June 1, 2024
Study Completion
July 1, 2024
Last Updated
May 29, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Ethical and Legal Constraints Informed Consent Limitations: Participants in prospective studies have not explicitly consented to broader data sharing. Ethical Risks: Even with de-identification, residual identifiability risks (e.g., through rare demographic or clinical data) may raise ethical concerns about re-identification of participants.