Fine-needle Biopsy Combined With Macroscopic On-site Evaluation for Diagnosis of Solid Pancreatic Lesions
Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Biopsy With or Without Macroscopic On-site Evaluation for Diagnosis of Solid Pancreatic Lesions: A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Non-Inferiority Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
148
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the diagnostic efficacy, core tissue acquisition ability, number of punctures and puncture time of macroscopic on-site evaluation (MOSE) and two punctures alone in Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) for solid pancreatic lesions. The main questions it aims to answer is: whether the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNB performed with two needle passes is not inferior to that of MOSE. Participants with solid pancreatic lesions who needs histological diagnosis will receive EUS-FNB using 22G Franseen. In Group 1, the macroscopically visible core (MVC) of the specimen was assessed. If the MVC of the sample obtained from the first needle was ≥10mm, the tissue strip was placed in Bottle A and fixed with formalin. A second needle was then used to obtain another tissue strip, which was directly placed into Bottle B containing formalin. However, if the MVC of the first needle sample was \< 10mm, the puncture procedure was continued until the cumulative length of sample's MVC was ≥10mm, and all the sample collected during this process were placed into Bottle A and fixed with formalin. In Group 2, two needles were used to obtain tissue strips, and all the tissue strips were placed into Bottle A formalin. Researchers will compare the diagnostic efficacy, core tissue acquisition ability, number of punctures and puncture time between the MOSE technique and two-needle puncture method.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 28, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 29, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 25, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 26, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 26, 2026
ExpectedJune 6, 2025
March 1, 2025
9 months
April 28, 2025
June 5, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Diagnostic accuracy
Diagnostic accuracy was calculated as the proportion of true positive and true negative in all evaluated cases.
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Median puncture number
2 months
Tissue adequacy
2 months
Puncture time
2 months
Other Outcomes (2)
Diagnostic sensitivity
2 months
Diagnostic specificity
2 months
Study Arms (2)
MOSE group
EXPERIMENTALPatients assigned to this group will receive EUS-FNB as routine. The obtained tissue will be evaluated by Macroscopic On-site Evaluation
Non-mose group
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients assigned to this group will receive EUS-FNB as routine. Two needles were punctured and all tissue strips were placed into bottle A formalin.
Interventions
The length of the tissue strips was judged using the specimen table and photographed for record. If the MVC of the first needle sample was ≥10mm, the tissue strip was placed into bottle A formalin for fixation. A second needle of tissue strip was pushed directly into the B-bottle formalin. If the first needle sample MVC was \< 10mm, the puncture was continued until the total length of sample MVC was ≥10mm, and all samples were placed into bottle A formalin.
Two needles were punctured and all tissue strips were placed into bottle A formalin.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- (Before the trial, subjects must meet all of the requirements listed below in order to be enrolled)
- years old (inclusive), male and female;
- patients with pancreatic solid mass \> 1cm detected by CT/MRI/PET-CT or EUS and requiring EUS-FNB diagnosis.
- written informed consent was obtained;
You may not qualify if:
- (Before the trial, participants could not be enrolled if they met any of the following requirements)
- contraindications to endoscopy, such as severe cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases;
- bleeding coagulation dysfunction (prothrombin international normalized ratio ≥1.5, platelet count ≤ 50 000) or use of antiplatelet drugs;
- confirmed pregnancy or possible pregnancy;
- pathological diagnosis has been obtained by other methods;
- refuse to participate in the study, are participating in another observational clinical trial, or have participated in another clinical trial within 60 days.
- other situations where EUS-FNB could not be performed.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Changhai Hospital
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200433, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Zhao Shen Li, M.D
Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University (Second Military Medical University), shanghai, China
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 28, 2025
First Posted
May 29, 2025
Study Start
June 25, 2025
Primary Completion
March 26, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
August 26, 2026
Last Updated
June 6, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share