Comparing Erector Spinae and Fascia Iliaca Blocks for Pain Relief After Femur Surgery.
Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block for Analgesia in Proximal and Midshaft Femur Surgeries in Adult Patients: A Randomized Controlled Study
1 other identifier
interventional
92
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This clinical study compares two types of nerve blocks used to control pain in adult patients undergoing surgery on the upper (proximal) or middle (midshaft) part of the femur (thigh bone). The two blocks being studied are the Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) block and the Fascia Iliaca Compartment (FIC) block. Both techniques are commonly used in hospitals to reduce postoperative pain. The goal is to determine which nerve block provides more effective pain relief, reduces the need for opioid medications, and supports faster recovery in patients following femur surgery. Results from this study may improve pain management strategies for similar procedures in the future. Adults scheduled for proximal or midshaft femur surgery may be eligible to participate. Eligibility is determined based on clinical criteria reviewed by the study team.Administration of one of the two nerve blocks before surgery.Standard surgical and postoperative care. Monitoring of pain levels at specific time points after surgery Recording of opioid medication usage Evaluation of patient satisfaction and any side effects related to the nerve block Duration: The intervention (nerve block) is administered once before surgery. Data collection continues during the immediate postoperative period and for a short time following surgery to assess outcomes. Both nerve blocks are considered safe and are regularly used in clinical practice. All procedures are performed by qualified clinicians, and safety monitoring is conducted throughout the study. Participants may experience improved pain relief and reduced need for opioid medications. While direct benefit cannot be guaranteed, information gained from the study may help improve pain management for future patients undergoing similar surgeries. Participation in the study is completely voluntary. Patients may choose not to participate or may withdraw from the study at any time without affecting the quality of their medical care.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 5, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 18, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 25, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 10, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 10, 2025
CompletedDecember 2, 2025
November 1, 2025
4 months
May 18, 2025
November 25, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
duration of the block
time starting immediatelyafter giving the block till the first postoperative analgesic rescue which will be used if the pain score exceeds 4/10
15 minutes after extubation till 24 hours postoperative
Study Arms (2)
ESPB Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORpatients was placed in the lateral position . the block was performed bz ipsilateral injection of a mixture containing 15mls bupivcaine 0,5% and 20mls normal saline.
FICB
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients was placed insupine position . the block performed using a mixture of 15mls bupivcaine 0,5% and 20mls normal saline.
Interventions
ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block (at lumbar level) in lateral position .
ultrasound guided suprainguinal approach in supine position
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age 18-80
- American society of Anathesiologist physical status ASA Ior II
- Patients undergoing Fixation of femur fractures
You may not qualify if:
- Refusal of participation in study.
- Bleeding disorders (platelets count \< 80,000, INR \>1.5, Prothrombin concentration \< 60%).
- Skin lesion, wounds or infection at the puncture site. Known allergy to local anesthetic drugs.
- Known local anesthetic (LA) drug sensitivity. -
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cairo Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
kasr alainy hospital -Cairo university , cairo
Cairo, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Lecturer of Anesthesia, surgical ICU and Pain Management Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 18, 2025
First Posted
May 25, 2025
Study Start
March 5, 2025
Primary Completion
July 10, 2025
Study Completion
August 10, 2025
Last Updated
December 2, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-11