Deflated and Inflated Cuff Endotracheal Extubations
DICEE
A Single-center, Patient- and Assessor-blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Patient Outcomes Between Deflated and Inflated Cuff Endotracheal Extubations During Scheduled, Non-airway Surgery in Healthy Adults
1 other identifier
interventional
88
1 country
1
Brief Summary
General anesthesia is a treatment with medicine to make a patient unconscious for surgery. This is sometimes called "being put to sleep" or "being put under." Most of the time, a breathing tube is used to help a machine breathe for patients. The breathing tube has a cuff, which is like a small balloon. After the breathing tube is placed, the cuff is inflated. This keeps the breathing tube in place and keeps fluids like saliva and stomach juices from getting into the windpipe and lungs. When a breathing tube is removed, that is called extubation. Normally, doctors deflate the cuff before removing the breathing tube. This is called deflated cuff extubation. Some doctors worry that keeping the cuff inflated while it is removed can damage the throat or vocal cords. However, some doctors keep the cuff inflated when removing the breathing tube. This is called inflated cuff extubation. These doctors think that keeping the cuff inflated can help keep fluids from entering the airway. Doctors have not studied if deflated cuff extubation is better or worse than inflated cuff extubation. The goal of this study is to see which type of extubation is better at keeping fluids from getting in the airway. Participants who are part of this study will get general anesthesia and have surgery as planned. Near the end of surgery, a small amount of liquid is placed at the back of a participant's mouth. This liquid is called contrast material, and it is like a dye. The contrast material will help determine if any liquid enters the windpipe or lungs. Then, contrast material is removed, along with any other fluids, using normal methods. When it is safe to take the breathing tube out, a deflated cuff extubation or an inflated cuff extubation will be performed. This decision will be made at random, like by the flip of a coin. Information will be collected about participants, the surgery, and how well a participant is breathing. After surgery, a chest x-ray will be taken to see if any of the contrast material is in the windpipe or lungs. Otherwise, everything else after surgery would be normal. 24 to 48 hours after surgery, a member of the research team will ask about any symptoms a participant may have, like sore throat or a hoarse voice. Research would conclude at that time.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 8, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 25, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 17, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2026
December 16, 2025
May 1, 2025
1.2 years
May 8, 2025
December 8, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Airway Contamination
Number of patients with presence of radio-opaque contrast material at or below the level of the carina on portable chest radiograph (yes/no)
0-30 minutes after arrival in the Post Anesthesia Care Unit
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Hypoxemia
0 to 6 minutes after tracheal extubation
Need for Supplemental Oxygen
0-6 minutes after tracheal extubation
Cough
0 to 6 minutes after tracheal extubation
Obstruction
0 to 6 minutes after tracheal extubation
Stridor
0 to 6 minutes after tracheal extubation
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Inflated Cuff Arm: 44
EXPERIMENTALExtubation with an inflated endotracheal tube cuff
Deflated Cuff Arm: 44
ACTIVE COMPARATORExtubation with a deflated endotracheal tube cuff
Interventions
The adjustable pressure limiting valve will be set to 20 centimeters water pressure. To blind the Anesthesiologist Associate Investigator from the patient's group allocation, sham deflation of the endotracheal tube cuff pilot balloon will be performed with a 10 milliliter syringe. The endotracheal tube will be withdrawn into an opaque blue towel while the reservoir bag is simultaneously compressed to generate at least 20 centimeters water pressure positive airway pressure. In the rare event significant resistance is met with attempted extubation, the principal investigator will deflate the cuff in one milliliter increments until extubation is possible. This process does not unblind the Anesthesiologist Associate Investigator.
The adjustable pressure-limiting valve will be set to 20 centimeters water pressure. All air will be removed from the endotracheal tube cuff pilot balloon with a 10 milliliter syringe. The endotracheal tube will be withdrawn into an opaque blue towel, to prevent the Anesthesiologist Associate Investigator from identifying the patient's allocation, while the reservoir bag is simultaneously compressed to generate at least 20 centimeters water pressure positive airway pressure.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults aged 18 to 50 years old
- Scheduled for surgery, not of the airway, head, or neck, with anticipated case duration of less than 3 hours
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Classification of 1 to 3
You may not qualify if:
- Emergent surgery, or surgery requiring prone, sitting or lateral positioning
- Pre-existing laryngeal pathology, obstructive pulmonary disease, pulmonary hypertension, interstitial lung disease, active respiratory infection, recent pneumonia, uncontrolled asthma, or uncontrolled gastroesophageal reflux disease
- Known difficulties with general anesthesia, such as prior anaphylactic reaction, difficult intubation or mask ventilation
- Known allergy to iohexol or a previous severe reaction to any contrast agents
- Unfavorable airway examination, such as Mallampati 4, limited mouth opening, and/or inability to extend neck
- Non-compliance with ASA Practice Guidelines for Preoperative Fasting
- Pregnancy
- Enrollment in another anesthesiology or surgery related interventional research study
- Surgeries scheduled on Friday or a day immediately prior to a holiday
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Naval Medical Center Camp Lejeune
Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, 28547, United States
Related Publications (50)
Lin EC. Radiation risk from medical imaging. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010 Dec;85(12):1142-6; quiz 1146. doi: 10.4065/mcp.2010.0260.
PMID: 21123642BACKGROUNDLasser EC, Lyon SG, Berry CC. Reports on contrast media reactions: analysis of data from reports to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Radiology. 1997 Jun;203(3):605-10. doi: 10.1148/radiology.203.3.9169676.
PMID: 9169676BACKGROUNDCaro JJ, Trindade E, McGregor M. The risks of death and of severe nonfatal reactions with high- vs low-osmolality contrast media: a meta-analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991 Apr;156(4):825-32. doi: 10.2214/ajr.156.4.1825900.
PMID: 1825900BACKGROUNDWolf GL, Arenson RL, Cross AP. A prospective trial of ionic vs nonionic contrast agents in routine clinical practice: comparison of adverse effects. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1989 May;152(5):939-44. doi: 10.2214/ajr.152.5.939.
PMID: 2495706BACKGROUNDKatayama H, Yamaguchi K, Kozuka T, Takashima T, Seez P, Matsuura K. Adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media. A report from the Japanese Committee on the Safety of Contrast Media. Radiology. 1990 Jun;175(3):621-8. doi: 10.1148/radiology.175.3.2343107.
PMID: 2343107BACKGROUNDMolfenter SM, Amin MR, Balou M, Herzberg EG, Frempong-Boadu A. A scoping review of the methods used to capture dysphagia after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: the need for a paradigm shift. Eur Spine J. 2023 Mar;32(3):969-976. doi: 10.1007/s00586-022-07515-1. Epub 2023 Jan 10.
PMID: 36625955BACKGROUNDDe Bodt MS, Wuyts FL, Van de Heyning PH, Croux C. Test-retest study of the GRBAS scale: influence of experience and professional background on perceptual rating of voice quality. J Voice. 1997 Mar;11(1):74-80. doi: 10.1016/s0892-1997(97)80026-4.
PMID: 9075179BACKGROUNDGhio A, Revis J, Smithson-Barriere D, Jarze S, Giovanni A. Reliability and Correlations Between Overall Severity, Roughness and Breathiness in the Perception of Dysphonic Voices: Investigating Cognitive Aspects. J Voice. 2024 Jan;38(1):136-143. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.07.010. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
PMID: 34452778BACKGROUNDTung A, Fergusson NA, Ng N, Hu V, Dormuth C, Griesdale DGE. Pharmacological methods for reducing coughing on emergence from elective surgery after general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation: protocol for a systematic review of common medications and network meta-analysis. Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 24;8(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-0947-2.
PMID: 30678727BACKGROUNDMinogue SC, Ralph J, Lampa MJ. Laryngotracheal topicalization with lidocaine before intubation decreases the incidence of coughing on emergence from general anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2004 Oct;99(4):1253-1257. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000132779.27085.52.
PMID: 15385385BACKGROUNDBazaz R, Lee MJ, Yoo JU. Incidence of dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery: a prospective study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Nov 15;27(22):2453-8. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200211150-00007.
PMID: 12435974BACKGROUNDDejonckere PH, Wieneke GH. GRBAS-scaling of pathological voices: reliability, clinical relevance and differentiated correlation with acoustic measurements, especially with central measurements. Proceedings of the 22nd IALP Congress. Hannover, Germany: 1992.
BACKGROUNDHirano M. Clinical examination of voice. New York: Springer Verlag, 1981:81-4.
BACKGROUNDLin R, Zhu L, Pan X. Validation of the simplified cough symptom score in non-small cell lung cancer patients after surgery. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Aug;70(8):735-739. doi: 10.1007/s11748-022-01791-w. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
PMID: 35224703BACKGROUNDLai K. Chinese National Guidelines on Diagnosis and Management of Cough: consensus and controversy. J Thorac Dis. 2014 Oct;6(Suppl 7):S683-8. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2014.10.06. No abstract available.
PMID: 25383201BACKGROUNDSivanandam LK, Verghese RJ, Balan S, Balamurugesan K. Accidental iohexol bronchography. BMJ Case Rep. 2021 Aug 5;14(8):e244942. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2021-244942. No abstract available.
PMID: 34353841BACKGROUNDSarkar P, Patel N, Chusid J, Shah R, Talwar A. The role of computed tomography bronchography in the management of bronchopleural fistulas. J Thorac Imaging. 2010 Feb;25(1):W10-3. doi: 10.1097/RTI.0b013e31819d12f1.
PMID: 20160584BACKGROUNDMacIntyre P, Peacock C, Gordon I, Mok Q. Use of tracheobronchography as a diagnostic tool in ventilator-dependent infants. Crit Care Med. 1998 Apr;26(4):755-9. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199804000-00028.
PMID: 9559615BACKGROUNDLittle AF, Phelan EM, Boldt DW, Brown TC. Paediatric tracheobronchomalacia and its assessment by tracheobronchography. Australas Radiol. 1996 Nov;40(4):398-403. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1673.1996.tb00434.x.
PMID: 8996899BACKGROUNDDeutsch ES, Smergel E, Crisci K, Panitch H. Tracheobronchography in children. Laryngoscope. 1996 Oct;106(10):1248-54. doi: 10.1097/00005537-199610000-00016.
PMID: 8849796BACKGROUNDHwang CH. Swallowing study using water-soluble contrast agents may increase aspiration sensitivity and antedate oral feeding without respiratory and drug complications: A STROBE-compliant prospective, observational, case-control trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Jul 8;101(27):e29422. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029422.
PMID: 35801762BACKGROUNDHarris JA, Bartelt D, Campion M, Gayler BW, Jones B, Hayes A, Haynos J, Herbick S, Kling T, Lingaraj A, Singer M, Starmer H, Smith C, Webster K. The use of low-osmolar water-soluble contrast in videofluoroscopic swallowing exams. Dysphagia. 2013 Dec;28(4):520-7. doi: 10.1007/s00455-013-9462-0. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
PMID: 23529533BACKGROUNDSun J, Li Z. Study on the Correlation between Barium Radiography and Pulmonary Infection rate in the Evaluation of Swallowing Function. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2018;73:e182. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2018/e182. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
PMID: 29924183BACKGROUNDMorcos SK. Review article: Effects of radiographic contrast media on the lung. Br J Radiol. 2003 May;76(905):290-5. doi: 10.1259/bjr/54892465.
PMID: 12763943BACKGROUNDClaussen D. Omnipaque (iohexol). Gastroenterol Nurs. 1992 Jun;14(6):307-9. doi: 10.1097/00001610-199206000-00007.
PMID: 1623033BACKGROUNDBrick SH, Caroline DF, Lev-Toaff AS, Friedman AC, Grumbach K, Radecki PD. Esophageal disruption: evaluation with iohexol esophagography. Radiology. 1988 Oct;169(1):141-3. doi: 10.1148/radiology.169.1.3420250.
PMID: 3420250BACKGROUNDYan GW, Deng JF, Bhetuwal A, Yang GQ, Fu QS, Chen H, Hu N, Zeng H, Fan XP, Yan GW, Wu XL. A case report and literature review of barium sulphate aspiration during upper gastrointestinal examination. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Nov;96(47):e8821. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008821.
PMID: 29381987BACKGROUNDCork RC, Depa RM, Standen JR. Prospective comparison of use of the laryngeal mask and endotracheal tube for ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg. 1994 Oct;79(4):719-27. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199410000-00018.
PMID: 7943782BACKGROUNDMraovic B, Hipszer B, Loeum C, Andonakakis A, Joseph J. Evaluation of continuous aspiration of subglottic secretions in prevention of microaspiration during general anesthesia: a randomized controlled pilot study. Croat Med J. 2022 Dec 31;63(6):553-563. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2022.63.553.
PMID: 36597567BACKGROUNDMehta S. The risk of aspiration in presence of cuffed endotracheal tubes. Br J Anaesth. 1972 Jun;44(6):601-5. doi: 10.1093/bja/44.6.601. No abstract available.
PMID: 5045553BACKGROUNDWhiffler K, Andrew WK, Thomas RG. The hazardous cuffed endotracheal tube--aspiration and extubation. S Afr Med J. 1982 Feb 13;61(7):240-1.
PMID: 7058448BACKGROUNDAtkins PM, Mion LC, Mendelson W, Palmer RM, Slomka J, Franko T. Characteristics and outcomes of patients who self-extubate from ventilatory support: a case-control study. Chest. 1997 Nov 5;112(5):1317-23. doi: 10.1378/chest.112.5.1317.
PMID: 9367475RESULTBoulain T. Unplanned extubations in the adult intensive care unit: a prospective multicenter study. Association des Reanimateurs du Centre-Ouest. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998 Apr;157(4 Pt 1):1131-7. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.157.4.9702083.
PMID: 9563730RESULTWunsch H, Linde-Zwirble WT, Angus DC, Hartman ME, Milbrandt EB, Kahn JM. The epidemiology of mechanical ventilation use in the United States. Crit Care Med. 2010 Oct;38(10):1947-53. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181ef4460.
PMID: 20639743RESULTda Silva PS, Fonseca MC. Unplanned endotracheal extubations in the intensive care unit: systematic review, critical appraisal, and evidence-based recommendations. Anesth Analg. 2012 May;114(5):1003-14. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31824b0296. Epub 2012 Feb 24.
PMID: 22366845RESULTKiekkas P, Aretha D, Panteli E, Baltopoulos GI, Filos KS. Unplanned extubation in critically ill adults: clinical review. Nurs Crit Care. 2013 May;18(3):123-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-5153.2012.00542.x. Epub 2012 Nov 22.
PMID: 23577947RESULTde Groot RI, Dekkers OM, Herold IH, de Jonge E, Arbous MS. Risk factors and outcomes after unplanned extubations on the ICU: a case-control study. Crit Care. 2011;15(1):R19. doi: 10.1186/cc9964. Epub 2011 Jan 13.
PMID: 21232123RESULTCosentino C, Fama M, Foa C, Bromuri G, Giannini S, Saraceno M, Spagnoletta A, Tenkue M, Trevisi E, Sarli L. Unplanned Extubations in Intensive Care Unit: evidences for risk factors. A literature review. Acta Biomed. 2017 Nov 30;88(5S):55-65. doi: 10.23750/abm.v88i5-S.6869.
PMID: 29189706RESULTBaftiu N, Krasniqi I, Haxhirexha K, Domi R. Survey about the Extubation Practice among Anaesthesiologists in Kosovo. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2018 Feb 12;6(2):350-354. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2018.083. eCollection 2018 Feb 15.
PMID: 29531602RESULTVance A, Hofmeister EH, Laas C, Williams J. The effects of extubation with an inflated versus deflated endotracheal tube cuff on endotracheal fluid volume in the dog. Vet Anaesth Analg. 2011 May;38(3):203-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-2995.2011.00610.x.
PMID: 21492385RESULTEphgrave KS, Kleiman-Wexler R, Pfaller M, Booth B, Werkmeister L, Young S. Postoperative pneumonia: a prospective study of risk factors and morbidity. Surgery. 1993 Oct;114(4):815-9; discussion 819-21.
PMID: 8211699RESULTBrown C. Endotracheal intubation in the dog. Lab Anim (NY). 2007 Feb;36(2):23-4. doi: 10.1038/laban0207-23.
PMID: 17245385RESULTPriebe HJ. Could "safe practice" be compromising safe practice? Should anesthetists have to deflate the cuff of the endotracheal tube before extubation? Minerva Anestesiol. 2016 Feb;82(2):236-9. Epub 2015 Jul 1.
PMID: 26126979RESULTShamsai J. A new technique for removal of endotracheal tube. Anesth Analg. 2006 Oct;103(4):1040. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000239021.80428.cb. No abstract available.
PMID: 17000831RESULTHulme J, Agarwal S. Failure to deflate an endotracheal cuff. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2008 May;52(5):719. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2007.01467.x. No abstract available.
PMID: 18419730RESULTSriramka B, Natarajan A, Sharma K, Zubair S. Failed endotracheal tube cuff deflation due to unusual kinking of inflation tube. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2023 Aug;23(4):241-243. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2023.23.4.241. Epub 2023 Jul 29. No abstract available.
PMID: 37559664RESULTKamata M, Hakim M, Tobias JD. Residual volume in the cuff of the endotracheal tube when the pilot balloon is torn off instead of deflated using a syringe. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Jul;86:15-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2016.04.012. Epub 2016 Apr 12.
PMID: 27260572RESULTSuman S, Ganjoo P, Tandon MS. Difficult extubation due to failure of an endotracheal tube cuff deflation. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2011 Jan;27(1):141-2. No abstract available.
PMID: 21804739RESULTSaidman LJ. Where is the evidence? Anesth Analg. 2007 Jul;105(1):285. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000278606.10006.fa. No abstract available.
PMID: 17578998RESULTCooper RM, O'Sullivan E, Popat M, Behringer E, Hagberg CA. Difficult Airway Society guidelines for the management of tracheal extubation. Anaesthesia. 2013 Feb;68(2):217. doi: 10.1111/anae.12139. No abstract available.
PMID: 23298360RESULT
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michael A Lee, MD
Naval Medical Center Camp Lejeune
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- FED
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Staff Anesthesiologist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 8, 2025
First Posted
May 25, 2025
Study Start
June 17, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2026
Last Updated
December 16, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- Study protocol, SAP, ICF will be available beginning 24APR2025 indefinitely, de-identified individual participant data will be available approximately SEP2026-SEP2033
- Access Criteria
- Medical and research professionals by request
All de-identified participant data