MEP Up-conditioning to Target Corticospinal Plasticity
uMEP2
Operant Conditioning of the Wrist Extensor Motor Evoked Potential to Target Corticospinal Plasticity and Upper Limb Motor Recovery After Cervical Spinal Cord Injury
2 other identifiers
interventional
11
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Individuals with chronic cervical spinal cord injury will complete a 10-week training protocol where participants receive non-invasive brain stimulation and feedback on the size of the corresponding muscle response (wrist extensor). Investigators will assess the impact of the brain stimulation training on 1) the brain-to-spinal cord-to-muscle connection and 2) motor functions of the arm and hand. Also, brain and spine magnetic resonance imaging will be collected before and after the training. The imaging measurements will tell investigators about how spinal damage, brain function, and brain structure relate to motor presentation and the response to the training.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for early_phase_1
Started May 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 8, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 25, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 27, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 31, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 31, 2027
March 30, 2026
March 1, 2026
1.8 years
May 8, 2025
March 25, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Extensor Carpi Radialis (ECR) Motor Evoked Potential (MEP) amplitude
Size of MEP elicited at the fixed stimulus intensity (e.g., \~ 10-15% maximum stimulator output) of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) above motor threshold) (in %M wave maximum amplitude)
Reported as an average of the 6 baseline sessions (over weeks 1-2) and average of the last 6 conditioning sessions (over weeks 8-10)
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Maximum Voluntary Contraction - ECR
Reported as an average of the 6 baseline sessions (over weeks 1-2) and average of the last 6 conditioning sessions (over weeks 8-10)
Capabilities Upper Extremity Test (CUE-T)
Baseline, after the 24th conditioning session (typically within 1 week), 1 month and 3 months post
Graded and Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility, and Prehension (GRASSP)
Baseline, after the 24th conditioning session (typically within 1 week), 1 month and 3 months post
Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM III)
Baseline, after the 24th conditioning session (typically within 1 week), 1 month and 3 months post
Life Situation Questionnaire Revised (LSQ-R)
Baseline, after the 24th conditioning session (typically within 1 week), 1 month and 3 months post
Other Outcomes (8)
ECR MEP recruitment curve
Baseline, after the 24th conditioning session (typically within 1 week), 1 month and 3 months post
Silent Period Duration
Reported as an average of the 6 baseline sessions (over weeks 1-2) and average of the last 6 conditioning sessions (over weeks 8-10)
Spine imaging - lesion overlap with lateral corticospinal tract (LCST) or motor tract damage
Baseline
- +5 more other outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Operant Up-Conditioning of the Motor Evoked Potential
EXPERIMENTALThe intervention consists of approximately 6 baseline sessions and 24 conditioning sessions at a pace of 3 sessions/week, 1-2 hour duration, over 10 weeks. At the beginning of each session, electromyographic (EMG) recording and nerve stimulating electrodes are placed over the arm. In all sessions, motor evoked potentials (MEPs) will be measured while the sitting subject provides a pre-set level of background muscle EMG with joint angles fixed. In 225 control trials of each baseline sessions and the first 20 trials of conditioning sessions the subject will receive no feedback as to MEP size (i.e., control MEPs). In 225 conditioning trials of each conditioning session, the subject will be encouraged to increase the target muscle MEP, and will receive immediate feedback as to whether MEP size was above a criterion (i.e., whether the trial was a success).
Interventions
At the beginning of each session, EMG recording and nerve stimulating electrodes are placed over the arm. In all sessions, MEPs will be measured while the sitting subject provides a pre-set level of background muscle EMG with joint angles fixed. In 225 control trials of each baseline sessions and the first 20 trials of conditioning sessions the subject will receive no feedback as to MEP size (i.e., control MEPs). In 225 conditioning trials of each conditioning session, the subject will be encouraged to increase the target muscle MEP, and will receive immediate feedback as to whether MEP size was above a criterion (i.e., whether the trial was a success).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult (≥18 yrs old)
- A history of injury to spinal cord at or above C6
- \>6 months post SCI
- Weak wrist extension at least unilaterally
- Expectation that current medication will be maintained without change for at least 3 months. Stable use of anti-spasticity medication (e.g., baclofen, diazepam, tizanidine) is accepted.
You may not qualify if:
- Motoneuron injury
- Medically unstable condition
- Cognitive impairment
- A history of epileptic seizures
- Metal implants in the cranium
- Implanted biomedical device in or above the chest (e.g., a cardiac pacemaker, cochlear implant)
- Extensive use of functional electrical stimulation to the arm on a daily basis
- Pregnancy (due to changes in posture and potential medical instability)
- Contraindications to MRI
- No measurable MEP elicited in the ECR
- Unable to produce any voluntary ECR EMG activity
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Allison Lewis, DPT, PhD
Medical University of South Carolina
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- early phase 1
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Post-doctoral Scholar, Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 8, 2025
First Posted
May 25, 2025
Study Start
May 27, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
March 31, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
March 31, 2027
Last Updated
March 30, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Access Criteria
- Data on NICHD DASH is available via controlled access. The requester must provide details about the study, funding source, principal investigator, and the names and email addresses of the authorized representative or Institutional Business Official, as well as any affiliated personnel. Additionally, the submission must include the NICHD DASH Data Use Agreement and, if required by the requested study, IRB Approval for Data Request. The requesting institution must also maintain active Federalwide Assurance (FWA) status MRI data in OpenNEURO is open to the public. Participants can opt in or out of sharing MRI data.
De-identified data will be shared with the OpenNEURO repository (MRI data) and the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Data and Specimen Hub (DASH) (clinical assessments and EMG data).