NCT06988527

Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to assess Honey in orabase (1:1) for treating patients with OLP and improving their quality of life: The research question aims to answer: Does honey in orabase (1:1) improve or reduce OLP symptoms compared to the standardized treatment by triamcinolone acetonide 0.1% drug and improve the patient's quality of life? Participants will: Take drug ABC or a placebo every day for 4 months Visit the clinic once every 2 weeks for checkups and tests Keep a diary of their symptoms and the number of times they use a rescue inhaler

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
56

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_2

Timeline
2mo left

Started May 2025

Shorter than P25 for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress87%
May 2025Jun 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 16, 2025

Completed
4 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 20, 2025

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 25, 2025

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 15, 2026

Expected
15 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 30, 2026

Last Updated

February 17, 2026

Status Verified

September 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1.1 years

First QC Date

May 16, 2025

Last Update Submit

February 12, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Clinical Assessment of OLP lesions using OLP score

    will be assessed by OLP score: Thongprasom et al.: score 0 (no lesions), score 1 (mild white striae only with no erythematous areas), score 2 (white striae exhibiting an atrophic area \< 1 cm2), score 3 (white striae alongside an atrophic area ≥ 1 cm2), score 4 (white striae in an erosive area \< 1 cm2), and score 5 (white striae alongside an erosive area ≥1 cm2). Atrophic OLP was defined as thinning of the oral mucosa, with a smooth red appearance, while erosive OLP involved ulceration and erosion of the mucosal surface.

    baseline to 1 year

  • Pain assessment using Visual analogue scale (VAS)

    (VAS) is a self-reported score typically consisting of a 10 cm horizontal line from right (best) to left (worst) with verbal descriptions (word anchors: 0 cm: No pain; 1 cm: Hardly notice pain; 2 cm: Notice pain does not interfere with activities; 3 cm: Sometimes distracts me; 4 cm: Distracts me, can do usual activities; 5 cm: Interrupts some activities; 6 cm: Hard to ignore, avoid usual activities; 7 cm: focus of attention, prevent doing daily activities; 8 cm: Awful, hard to do anything; 9 cm: Can not bear the pain, unable to do anything; 10 cm: As bad as it could be, nothing else matters)

    baseline- to 1 year

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Long-term satisfaction of patients with OLP treated with honey, recurrence rates, and quality of life after one year of treatment

    baseline to 1 year

Study Arms (2)

Group I with OLP at buccal mucosa

EXPERIMENTAL

The trial Group (I) (honey in orabase 1: 1 paste), four times daily after meals or rinsing

Drug: Honey in orabase 1: 1 paste

Group II with OLP at buccal mucosa

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Group (II): triamcinolone acetonide 0.1% ointment, four times daily after meals or rinsing

Drug: Honey in orabase 1: 1 paste

Interventions

The experimental drug was manufactured and packed at the Faculty of Pharmacy, Price Sattam University, SA. Production of a mucoadhesive paste involves a step-by-step process. in the final step, honey, comprising 50% of the total composition was thoroughly blended with the prepared base to ensure homogeneity

Also known as: Triamcinolone acetonide 0.1% ointment
Group I with OLP at buccal mucosaGroup II with OLP at buccal mucosa

Eligibility Criteria

Age35 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients with a clinical diagnosis of oral lichen planus
  • Symptomatic OLP lesions (erosive/atrophic)
  • Participants are between 35 and 60 years old, who are able to adhere to the study protocol, and sign informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with other oral mucosal disorders, or systemic conditions influencing OLP or wound healing, allergies or hypersensitivity to honey or triamcinolone
  • Patients who administer systemic corticosteroids or immunosuppressive agents.
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Inability to comprehend or adhere to study directives
  • Patients who are not able to sign an informed written consent

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Dar AlUloom University

Riyadh, 11512, Saudi Arabia

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Interventions

HoneyTriamcinolone AcetonideOintments

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

FoodDiet, Food, and NutritionPhysiological PhenomenaFood and BeveragesTriamcinolonePregnadienesPregnanesSteroidsFused-Ring CompoundsPolycyclic CompoundsSteroids, FluorinatedDosage FormsPharmaceutical Preparations

Study Officials

  • Sally A ElHaddad, Assist. Prof

    Dar AlUloom University, SA

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Sally A ElHaddad, Assist Prof

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
This was a double-blind, parallel-group clinical trial. Both participants and outcome assessors were blinded to the intervention. The honey in orabase and triamcinolone formulations were prepared to appear similar in color, texture, and packaging to ensure concealment. Identical containers were used for both treatments, and labeling was done using coded identifiers maintained by a third party not involved in the assessment or data analysis. Participants were instructed to apply the provided formulation as directed without being informed of the specific treatment assignment.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: * Zα/2=1.96=1.96 (for 95% confidence) * Zβ=1.28 (to 90% power) * SD=196 * Δ=1.33 N≈55.65 N=56 56 patients diagnosed with Oral Lichen Planus, randomly assigned to one of the 2 groups
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assist. Prof. Oral Medicine and Periodontology

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 16, 2025

First Posted

May 25, 2025

Study Start

May 20, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 15, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Last Updated

February 17, 2026

Record last verified: 2025-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

will be made available to researchers upon reasonable request, in order to support further research and meta-analyses. Data to be Shared: Demographic data (e.g., age, gender) Baseline clinical characteristics Treatment allocation (coded) Outcome measures (e.g., clinical response, pain scores, lesion size) Adverse events and safety data Follow-up assessments Supporting Documents: Study protocol Statistical analysis plan Informed consent form (redacted) Case report forms (CRFs)

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
IPD will be available beginning 6 months following publication and for up to 5 years. Data will be shared through secure data repositories or direct communication with the corresponding author, after review and approval of a formal data request, including a data use agreement.
Access Criteria
Access to IPD will be granted to qualified researchers affiliated with academic institutions, healthcare organizations, or non-profit research entities. Requests must include: A research proposal with clear scientific objectives and methods Evidence of ethical approval (if applicable) A signed data use agreement ensuring confidentiality, data protection, and responsible data handling Agreement not to attempt to re-identify individual participants Requests will be evaluated by the study team based on scientific merit, ethical considerations, and alignment with the purpose of the original study.

Locations