Treatment Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction of Oral Lichen Planus Treatment
1 other identifier
interventional
56
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to assess Honey in orabase (1:1) for treating patients with OLP and improving their quality of life: The research question aims to answer: Does honey in orabase (1:1) improve or reduce OLP symptoms compared to the standardized treatment by triamcinolone acetonide 0.1% drug and improve the patient's quality of life? Participants will: Take drug ABC or a placebo every day for 4 months Visit the clinic once every 2 weeks for checkups and tests Keep a diary of their symptoms and the number of times they use a rescue inhaler
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2
Started May 2025
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 16, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 20, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 25, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 15, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2026
February 17, 2026
September 1, 2025
1.1 years
May 16, 2025
February 12, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Clinical Assessment of OLP lesions using OLP score
will be assessed by OLP score: Thongprasom et al.: score 0 (no lesions), score 1 (mild white striae only with no erythematous areas), score 2 (white striae exhibiting an atrophic area \< 1 cm2), score 3 (white striae alongside an atrophic area ≥ 1 cm2), score 4 (white striae in an erosive area \< 1 cm2), and score 5 (white striae alongside an erosive area ≥1 cm2). Atrophic OLP was defined as thinning of the oral mucosa, with a smooth red appearance, while erosive OLP involved ulceration and erosion of the mucosal surface.
baseline to 1 year
Pain assessment using Visual analogue scale (VAS)
(VAS) is a self-reported score typically consisting of a 10 cm horizontal line from right (best) to left (worst) with verbal descriptions (word anchors: 0 cm: No pain; 1 cm: Hardly notice pain; 2 cm: Notice pain does not interfere with activities; 3 cm: Sometimes distracts me; 4 cm: Distracts me, can do usual activities; 5 cm: Interrupts some activities; 6 cm: Hard to ignore, avoid usual activities; 7 cm: focus of attention, prevent doing daily activities; 8 cm: Awful, hard to do anything; 9 cm: Can not bear the pain, unable to do anything; 10 cm: As bad as it could be, nothing else matters)
baseline- to 1 year
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Long-term satisfaction of patients with OLP treated with honey, recurrence rates, and quality of life after one year of treatment
baseline to 1 year
Study Arms (2)
Group I with OLP at buccal mucosa
EXPERIMENTALThe trial Group (I) (honey in orabase 1: 1 paste), four times daily after meals or rinsing
Group II with OLP at buccal mucosa
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup (II): triamcinolone acetonide 0.1% ointment, four times daily after meals or rinsing
Interventions
The experimental drug was manufactured and packed at the Faculty of Pharmacy, Price Sattam University, SA. Production of a mucoadhesive paste involves a step-by-step process. in the final step, honey, comprising 50% of the total composition was thoroughly blended with the prepared base to ensure homogeneity
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with a clinical diagnosis of oral lichen planus
- Symptomatic OLP lesions (erosive/atrophic)
- Participants are between 35 and 60 years old, who are able to adhere to the study protocol, and sign informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with other oral mucosal disorders, or systemic conditions influencing OLP or wound healing, allergies or hypersensitivity to honey or triamcinolone
- Patients who administer systemic corticosteroids or immunosuppressive agents.
- Pregnancy or lactation
- Inability to comprehend or adhere to study directives
- Patients who are not able to sign an informed written consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Dar AlUloom University
Riyadh, 11512, Saudi Arabia
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sally A ElHaddad, Assist. Prof
Dar AlUloom University, SA
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- This was a double-blind, parallel-group clinical trial. Both participants and outcome assessors were blinded to the intervention. The honey in orabase and triamcinolone formulations were prepared to appear similar in color, texture, and packaging to ensure concealment. Identical containers were used for both treatments, and labeling was done using coded identifiers maintained by a third party not involved in the assessment or data analysis. Participants were instructed to apply the provided formulation as directed without being informed of the specific treatment assignment.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assist. Prof. Oral Medicine and Periodontology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 16, 2025
First Posted
May 25, 2025
Study Start
May 20, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 15, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2026
Last Updated
February 17, 2026
Record last verified: 2025-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- IPD will be available beginning 6 months following publication and for up to 5 years. Data will be shared through secure data repositories or direct communication with the corresponding author, after review and approval of a formal data request, including a data use agreement.
- Access Criteria
- Access to IPD will be granted to qualified researchers affiliated with academic institutions, healthcare organizations, or non-profit research entities. Requests must include: A research proposal with clear scientific objectives and methods Evidence of ethical approval (if applicable) A signed data use agreement ensuring confidentiality, data protection, and responsible data handling Agreement not to attempt to re-identify individual participants Requests will be evaluated by the study team based on scientific merit, ethical considerations, and alignment with the purpose of the original study.
will be made available to researchers upon reasonable request, in order to support further research and meta-analyses. Data to be Shared: Demographic data (e.g., age, gender) Baseline clinical characteristics Treatment allocation (coded) Outcome measures (e.g., clinical response, pain scores, lesion size) Adverse events and safety data Follow-up assessments Supporting Documents: Study protocol Statistical analysis plan Informed consent form (redacted) Case report forms (CRFs)