NCT06988228

Brief Summary

This study aims to investigate the effects of 15% dextrose solution on pain and range of motion in patients aged 40 to 75 years who have experienced a stroke and suffering from hemiplegic shoulder pain

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2024

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 24, 2024

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 17, 2025

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 23, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2025

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

January 9, 2026

Status Verified

May 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

May 17, 2025

Last Update Submit

January 7, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

%15 prolotherapy%15 dextrose injectionhemiplegic shoulder painpost-stroke rehabilitationfugl-meyerbarthel ındex

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Pain intensity measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS, 0-10 cm; higher scores = worse pain)

    Pain intensity will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), a 10-centimeter scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). Higher scores indicate worse outcomes (greater pain intensity). Pain will be evaluated in three different conditions: at rest, after exercise, and during daily activities. Participants will rate their pain separately for each condition. The change in VAS scores from baseline to 1 month and 3 months after the final injection will be evaluated.

    Baseline, 1 month after last injection, 3 months after last injection

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Shoulder Range of Motion (ROM) measured using a standard goniometer (abduction and flexion, degrees)

    Baseline, 1 month after last injection, 3 months after last injection

  • Barthel Index Score (range 0-100; higher scores = better functional independence)

    Baseline, 1 month after last injection, 3 months after last injection

  • Fugl-Meyer Assessment - Upper Extremity (Shoulder Subsection) Score (range 0-40; higher scores = better motor function)

    Baseline, 1 month after last injection, 3 months after last injection

Study Arms (2)

intervention group

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants in this group will receive three sessions of 15% dextrose solution injections at two-week intervals, in addition to conventional exercise therapy.

Biological: 15% Dextrose Injection

control group

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Participants in this group will receive three sessions of isotonic saline solution injections at two-week intervals, in addition to conventional exercise therapy.

Other: izotonic saline injection

Interventions

15% dextrose solution will be administered by injection in three sessions at two-week intervals. It will be applied in combination with conventional exercise therapy.

intervention group

Participants will receive isotonic saline solution injections in three sessions at two-week intervals, as a placebo comparator to the 15% dextrose injections. All participants will also receive conventional exercise therapy.

control group

Eligibility Criteria

Age40 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients aged between 40 and 75 years
  • History of stroke
  • Brunnstrom stage 2 or higher in the upper extremity
  • Provided written informed consent and agreed to participate in the study

You may not qualify if:

  • History of any prior injection therapy to the shoulder region
  • Previous radiotherapy or surgery involving the shoulder
  • Pre-stroke shoulder pain
  • History of shoulder surgery
  • History of inflammatory joint disease
  • Presence of neuromuscular disorders
  • Full-thickness rotator cuff tear
  • Patients with aphasia or severe cognitive impairment
  • Presence of pectoral muscle spasticity
  • Active malignancy with acute inflammation at the treatment site
  • Known coagulation disorder with INR ≥ 4
  • Presence of vascular conditions such as deep vein thrombosis, phlebitis, varicose veins, or arterial disease in the affected limb

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Istanbul Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Training and Research Hospital

Istanbul, bahçelievler, 34186, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Coskun Benlidayi I, Basaran S. Hemiplegic shoulder pain: a common clinical consequence of stroke. Pract Neurol. 2014 Apr;14(2):88-91. doi: 10.1136/practneurol-2013-000606. Epub 2013 Aug 12.

    PMID: 23940374BACKGROUND
  • Hauser RA, Lackner JB, Steilen-Matias D, Harris DK. A Systematic Review of Dextrose Prolotherapy for Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain. Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Jul 7;9:139-59. doi: 10.4137/CMAMD.S39160. eCollection 2016.

    PMID: 27429562BACKGROUND
  • Thor JA, Mohamed Hanapi NH, Halil H, Suhaimi A. Perineural Injection Therapy in the Management of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: A Sweet Solution to Pain. Pain Med. 2017 Oct 1;18(10):2041-2045. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnx063. No abstract available.

    PMID: 28460075BACKGROUND
  • Kumar P. Hemiplegic shoulder pain in people with stroke: present and the future. Pain Manag. 2019 Mar 1;9(2):107-110. doi: 10.2217/pmt-2018-0075. Epub 2019 Jan 25. No abstract available.

    PMID: 30681020BACKGROUND
  • Mansiz-Kaplan B, Nacir B, Pervane-Vural S, Tosun-Meric O, Duyur-Cakit B, Genc H. Effect of Perineural Dextrose Injection on Ulnar Neuropathy at the Elbow: A Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 Nov;103(11):2085-2091. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.04.013. Epub 2022 Jun 9.

    PMID: 35690093BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Interventions

Glucose

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

HexosesMonosaccharidesSugarsCarbohydrates

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Masking Details
This is a single-blinded study. Participants are blinded to the type of solution (dextrose or isotonic saline) administered during the injections.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: The study includes two parallel groups. Both receive conventional exercise therapy. The intervention group receives three sessions of 15% dextrose solution injections, and the control group receives three sessions of isotonic saline solution injections, administered at two-week intervals.
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
principal investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 17, 2025

First Posted

May 23, 2025

Study Start

December 24, 2024

Primary Completion

August 1, 2025

Study Completion

September 1, 2025

Last Updated

January 9, 2026

Record last verified: 2025-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

De-identified individual participant data (IPD) will be available upon reasonable request from qualified researchers after the publication of study results. Data sharing will require approval by the principal investigator and compliance with ethical guidelines.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
Time Frame
De-identified IPD and supporting information will be available 6 months after publication of the primary results and will remain accessible for up to 3 years.
Access Criteria
Qualified researchers may request access to the IPD and supporting documents. Requests will be reviewed and approved by the principal investigator. A data use agreement and adherence to ethical standards will be required.

Locations