NCT06988072

Brief Summary

The human pathogen BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) is a ubiquitous, small, non-enveloped DNA virus that infects over 90% of people, typically in childhood with mild or no symptoms. Following primary infection, BKPyV establishes latency predominantly in the reno-urinary tract, and can occasionally be detected in the urine without any concomitant clinical symptoms. However, among kidney transplant recipients (KTR), due to impaired cellular and humoral immunity, uncontrolled viral replication in renal tubular epithelial cells (RPTE) can occur, leading to high-level BKPyV DNAemia and significant damage to the reno-urinary system (ie polyomavirus-associated nephropathy). In the absence of any effective antiviral drug, the mainstay of therapy for significant BKPyV replication among KTR is reducing immunosuppressive drugs, despite the subsequent of risk of graft rejection. Current efforts to identify new monitoring and therapeutical strategies need to be supported by a better understanding of the dynamics of BKPyV-specific immune responses following transplantation. Although adaptive cellular and humoral immune responses play a crucial role in the control of BKPyV reactivation among healthy individuals, immunosuppression and transplantation disrupt immune homeostasis and reshape the immune response landscape both in terms of function and fitness to new stimuli. Consequently, pre-transplant prediction of patients who will be able to control post-transplant BKPyV reactivation or who will develop BKPyV-related complications remains challenging. This knowledge gap stems from insufficient studies on the comprehensive analysis of immune responses during BKPyV reactivation. In particular, most studies to date have not investigated the role of NK cells in this context, despite their potent antiviral activity, heterogenous repertoire in each patient and their recently uncovered adaptive properties. The hypothesis is that among KTR with de novo BKPyV DNAemia, the comprehensive analysis of anti-BKPyV immune responses (including both the description of NK cell repertoire and adaptive immune), could allow

  • A better stratification of KTR at-risk for BKPyV-related complications using accessible immune biomarkers.
  • The identification of the most efficient strategies of immunosuppression management for the control of BKPyV DNAemia, that could be further evaluated in a prospective cohort.
  • The identification of immunological correlates for the control of BKPyV DNAemia, which aim at providing a foundation for the development of future immunotherapeutic strategies.

Trial Health

65
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
75

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
26mo left

Started May 2025

Typical duration for all trials

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress31%
May 2025May 2028

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 4, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 23, 2025

Completed
7 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 30, 2025

Completed
3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 30, 2028

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 30, 2028

Last Updated

May 23, 2025

Status Verified

May 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

3 years

First QC Date

April 4, 2025

Last Update Submit

May 16, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Polyomavirus hominis 1Natural killer cellsT-lymphocytesNeutralizing antibodiesAdaptative immunityImmunologic memoryInnate immunity recognitionTrained immunityImmune repertoireBiomarkersBKPyV-association nephropathy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Number of circulating NK cells

    NK cells circulating repertoire defects associated with BKPyV-DNAemia Extensive characterization of the phenotype of circulating NK cells among kidney transplant recipients with de novo BKPyV DNAemia to predict the clinically relevant outcome "BKPyV reactivation control"

    At inclusion

  • Number of circulating NK cells

    NK cells circulating repertoire defects associated with BKPyV-DNAemia Extensive characterization of the phenotype of circulating NK cells among kidney transplant recipients with de novo BKPyV DNAemia to predict the clinically relevant outcome "BKPyV reactivation control"

    At 1 month

  • Number of circulating NK cells

    NK cells circulating repertoire defects associated with BKPyV-DNAemia Extensive characterization of the phenotype of circulating NK cells among kidney transplant recipients with de novo BKPyV DNAemia to predict the clinically relevant outcome "BKPyV reactivation control"

    At 3 months

  • Number of circulating NK cells

    NK cells circulating repertoire defects associated with BKPyV-DNAemia Extensive characterization of the phenotype of circulating NK cells among kidney transplant recipients with de novo BKPyV DNAemia to predict the clinically relevant outcome "BKPyV reactivation control"

    At 12 months

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • Frequency of Functional Impact of BKPyV Reactivation on NK Cell Effector Functions

    Up to 12 months

  • Frequency of T- and B-cell specific functional responses in patients with de novo BKPyV reactivation

    Up to 12 months

  • Correlation between the main changes in immunosuppressive treatment and the anti-BPyV immune response

    Up to 12 months

  • Correlation between the main changes in immunosuppressive treatment and the control of BKPyV viremia

    Up to 12 months

  • Correlation between the main changes in immunosuppressive treatment and the occurrence of BKPyV nephropathy

    Up to 12 months

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

Kidney transplant recipients with de novo BKPyV DNAemia

kidney transplant recipients with de novo BKPyV DNAemia within the first 12 months post-transplantation, including adult and pediatric patients

Other: blood sampling

Control subjects : Healthy adult donors from the National blood bak

Other: blood sampling

Control subjects : Kidney transplant recipients without BKPyV DNAemia

Other: blood sampling

Interventions

At BKPyV reactivation, at 1 month, 3 months and 12 months

Kidney transplant recipients with de novo BKPyV DNAemia

Eligibility Criteria

Age7 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Study population: kidney transplant recipients with de novo BKPyV DNAemia within the first 12 months post-transplantation, including adult and pediatric patients. Control subjects: control subjects will be matched to the study patients (criteria below with a ratio of 1-1-1): * Healthy adult donors from the National blood bak (Etablissement Français du Sang - EFS): these control patients will be matched to study population patients on age (± 5ans) and sex * Kidney transplant recipients without BKPyV DNAemia, enrolled within the active cohorts of the participating centers: these control patients will be matched to study population patients on age (± 5ans), enrolling center, time since transplantation (± 3 months), and sex.

You may qualify if:

  • No objection to participation in the research study (from patients or legal guardians)
  • Affiliated to the French national social security system
  • Age ≥ 7 years old
  • Weight ≥ 12 kg
  • Additional criteria for kidney transplant recipients with BKPyV DNAemia:
  • Detectable de novo BKPyV DNAemia within the first 12 months post-transplantation
  • Additional criteria for kidney transplant recipients without BKPyV DNAemia:
  • No detectable de novo BKPyV DNAemia within the first 12 months post-transplantation
  • Additional criteria for healthy donors (controls):
  • Age ≥ 18 years old
  • Blood donation to the EFS
  • Consent for the use of their blood donation for research purposes.

You may not qualify if:

  • Objection to participation in the research study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Biospecimen

Retention: SAMPLES WITH DNA

blood samples

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Blood Specimen Collection

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Specimen HandlingClinical Laboratory TechniquesDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisPuncturesSurgical Procedures, OperativeInvestigative Techniques

Central Study Contacts

Julien Gras, MD

CONTACT

Jérôme Lambert, MD PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 4, 2025

First Posted

May 23, 2025

Study Start

May 30, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 30, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 30, 2028

Last Updated

May 23, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-05