Perineal Massage Using A Pelvic Wand During Pregnancy
A Pilot Study To Assess The Effect Of Antepartum Perineal Massage Using A Pelvic Wand On Labor Agency And Pelvic Health
1 other identifier
interventional
140
1 country
1
Brief Summary
There is limited research on the optimal strategy to reduce obstetric laceration, postpartum urinary retention, and postpartum pelvic pain. In systematic reviews, clinician-directed massage of the perineal muscles at the time of birth and patient directed massage of the perineal muscles in the third trimester to inconsistently reduce the incidence of severe obstetric laceration.1,2 However, there is significant heterogeneity of these studies is due in large part to the lack of a standardized protocols and unpredictability of clinician availability to perform perineal massage around the time of birth. The purpose of this study is to understand how perineal massage with a pelvic wand in late pregnancy and during labor influences one's sense of self-control over the labor process and birth experience.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Oct 2025
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 14, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 23, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2026
ExpectedMarch 9, 2026
March 1, 2026
6 months
May 14, 2025
March 6, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Mean score difference between the two arms on the Labor Agentry Scale
A clinically significant difference is defined as a mean score difference of 10 points
During hospitalization (assessed up to 5 days)
Secondary Outcomes (6)
The average number of completed massage sessions prior to hospitalization
6-8 weeks prior to birth event
The average number of completed massage sessions during hospitalization
24-48 hours
The average number of completed massage sessions postpartum
6 weeks post birth time point
Number of patients with postpartum urinary symptoms
12 weeks postpartum
Number of patients with pelvic floor dysfunction in the postpartum period
6 weeks postpartum and 12 week postpartum
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Intervention
EXPERIMENTALThe intervention arm will receive standard of care education about the benefits of perineal massage and receive instruction to perform the massage three times weekly. They will then watch a 2-minute video to demonstrate proper use and cleaning of the device to assist with antepartum perineal massage. Trained study personnel will also be available to answer questions on proper use, storage, and cleaning. Participants will be provided with the pelvic wand at enrollment and asked to use the device at least three times weekly for 10 minutes beginning at enrollment until their hospitalization for birth. This frequency and duration are what is recommended by pelvic floor physical therapists and is their standard of care.
Control
NO INTERVENTIONThe control arm will receive standard of care verbal education about the benefits of self-directed (or partner) manual perineal massage in the antepartum period and during the birthing process. They will be given the device after birth before hospital discharge.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Pregnant
- Plan to give birth at BIDMC
- Age ≥18 years old
- English language preference
- weeks 'gestation
You may not qualify if:
- Contraindication to vaginal birth, active genital herpes infection, fetal anomaly requiring cesarean birth).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States
Related Publications (3)
Eason E, Labrecque M, Wells G, Feldman P. Preventing perineal trauma during childbirth: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Mar;95(3):464-71. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(99)00560-8.
PMID: 10711565BACKGROUNDAasheim V, Nilsen ABV, Reinar LM, Lukasse M. Perineal techniques during the second stage of labour for reducing perineal trauma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 13;6(6):CD006672. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006672.pub3.
PMID: 28608597BACKGROUNDHodnett ED, Simmons-Tropea DA. The Labour Agentry Scale: psychometric properties of an instrument measuring control during childbirth. Res Nurs Health. 1987 Oct;10(5):301-10. doi: 10.1002/nur.4770100503.
PMID: 3671777BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sarah Little, MD
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Fellow in Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 14, 2025
First Posted
May 23, 2025
Study Start
October 1, 2025
Primary Completion
April 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2026
Last Updated
March 9, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03