Bipolar Resection vs Enucleation of Prostate
TURP vs BiTUEP
Bipolar Trans Urethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP) Versus Bipolar Enucleation of the Prostate in Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH): A Prospective Randomized Comparative Clinical Study
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to evaluate efficacy and safety of transurethral resection of the prostate and bipolar enucleation of the prostate.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 29, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 21, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2026
May 21, 2025
May 1, 2025
1.1 years
April 29, 2025
May 17, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Catheter and lower urinary tract symptoms free after Bipolar Transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) versus Bipolar Transurethral enucleation of prostate (TUEP) in patient with BPH with lower urinary tract symptoms
To determine number of patients in each group that will be Catheter and lower urinary tract symptoms free with changes in IPPS \< 20 score after intervention and follow up at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months.
at least 6 months up to one year
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Operative time in minutes in each group of intervention
60 - 90 minutes for each group of intervention
Compare complication rate of TURP versus TUEP
at least 6 months up to one year
Cost effectiveness of TURP versus TUEP in achieving catheter-free rates in BPH patients with urinary retention
at least 6 months up to one year
Compare patient reported symptom measures by IPSS questionnaire after TURP versus TUEP
at least 6 months up to one year
Compare patient reported symptom measures by Michigan Incontinence Symptom Index (M-ISI) questionnaire after TURP versus TUEP
at least 6 months up to one year
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Transurethral resection of prostate
ACTIVE COMPARATORTransurethral resection of prostate (TURP) will be performed under spinal or general anesthesia as per usual care.
Transuretheral enucleation of prostate
ACTIVE COMPARATORTransurethral enucleation of prostate (TUEP) will be performed under spinal or general anesthesia as per usual care.
Interventions
Using bipolar loop diathermy via cystoscopy, excess prostate tissue is resected piecemeal to remove obstruction to the prostatic urethra due to BPH.
Using bipolar enucleation loop diathermy via cystoscopy, to anatomically enucleate prostate.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to BPH.
- Patients with international prostate score system (IPSS) more than 8.
- Patients with maximal urinary flow rate (Qmax) less than 10ml/second.
- Patients with Prostatic volume (60 - 100 gm).
- Patient with indication for surgical intervention.
- Patient age (50-80 years old)
You may not qualify if:
- Prostatic cancer.
- Bladder cancer.
- Urethral stricture.
- Neurogenic bladder.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of Medicine South Valley University
Qina, Qena Governorate, 83523, Egypt
Related Publications (6)
Zhang Y, Yuan P, Ma D, Gao X, Wei C, Liu Z, Li R, Wang S, Liu J, Liu X. Efficacy and safety of enucleation vs. resection of prostate for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2019 Dec;22(4):493-508. doi: 10.1038/s41391-019-0135-4. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
PMID: 30816336BACKGROUNDSeitz M, Sroka R, Gratzke C, Schlenker B, Steinbrecher V, Khoder W, Tilki D, Bachmann A, Stief C, Reich O. The diode laser: a novel side-firing approach for laser vaporisation of the human prostate--immediate efficacy and 1-year follow-up. Eur Urol. 2007 Dec;52(6):1717-22. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.06.028. Epub 2007 Jun 26.
PMID: 17628326BACKGROUNDBachmann A, Schurch L, Ruszat R, Wyler SF, Seifert HH, Muller A, Lehmann K, Sulser T. Photoselective vaporization (PVP) versus transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP): a prospective bi-centre study of perioperative morbidity and early functional outcome. Eur Urol. 2005 Dec;48(6):965-71; discussion 972. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.07.001. Epub 2005 Jul 18.
PMID: 16126327BACKGROUNDGilling PJ, Wilson LC, King CJ, Westenberg AM, Frampton CM, Fraundorfer MR. Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing holmium laser enucleation of the prostate and transurethral resection of the prostate: results at 7 years. BJU Int. 2012 Feb;109(3):408-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10359.x. Epub 2011 Aug 23.
PMID: 21883820BACKGROUNDArcaniolo D, Manfredi C, Veccia A, Herrmann TRW, Lima E, Mirone V, Fusco F, Fiori C, Antonelli A, Rassweiler J, Liatsikos E, Porpiglia F, De Sio M, Autorino R; EAU Section of Uro-Technology (ESUT) Research Group. Bipolar endoscopic enucleation versus bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate: an ESUT systematic review and cumulative analysis. World J Urol. 2020 May;38(5):1177-1186. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02890-9. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
PMID: 31346761BACKGROUNDHo HS, Yip SK, Lim KB, Fook S, Foo KT, Cheng CW. A prospective randomized study comparing monopolar and bipolar transurethral resection of prostate using transurethral resection in saline (TURIS) system. Eur Urol. 2007 Aug;52(2):517-22. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.03.038. Epub 2007 Mar 28.
PMID: 17416453BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Lecturer
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 29, 2025
First Posted
May 21, 2025
Study Start
June 1, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
July 1, 2026
Last Updated
May 21, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share