NCT06982885

Brief Summary

Colorectal cancer (colorectal cancer, CRC) is the third most common malignant tumor globally and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Colonoscopy is considered the preferred method for screening colorectal cancer; early detection and removal of colorectal neoplasms can significantly reduce the incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer. To improve the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopy in colorectal lesions, many endoscopic techniques have been applied clinically, such as image-enhanced endoscopy, including narrow band imaging (narrow-band imaging, NBI), magnifying endoscopy, chromoendoscopy, confocal laser endoscopy, and endocytoscopy (EC). However, with the increasing number of endoscopic resections, the costs associated with the pathological diagnosis of resected specimens have risen year by year. In clinical practice, some non-neoplastic colorectal lesions may not require resection, so it is important to differentiate the nature of lesions during colonoscopy. Endocytoscopy is an ultra-high magnification endoscope that, when combined with chemical staining and narrowband imaging techniques, allows the endoscopist to observe the nuclear morphology of colorectal lesions, the shape of glands, and the morphology of microvessels through the naked eye. This approach avoids the need for pathological examination, achieving the goal of real-time biopsy in vivo. However, the accuracy of endocytoscopic image interpretation requires extensive experience to improve judgment, and there is a certain degree of subjectivity and error in the endoscopist's assessment process. Therefore, to address this issue, clinical applications have proposed using artificial intelligence (AI) for computer-aided diagnosis. The investigator's center has previously developed an AI-assisted diagnostic system based on endocytoscopy with NBI to assist in determining the nature of colorectal lesions. However, forward-looking clinical studies are still lacking to verify the effectiveness of this AI-assisted system. Thus, the investigator aim to conduct such clinical research to validate the clinical efficacy of this AI.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
500

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2025

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 14, 2025

Completed
5 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 19, 2025

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 21, 2025

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

August 7, 2025

Status Verified

August 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

8 months

First QC Date

May 14, 2025

Last Update Submit

August 4, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

endocytoscopyartificial intelligence

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The accuracy of AI in diagnosing tumor lesions (including sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV)) and high confidence rate were evaluated

    2025-12-31

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • The accuracy and high confidence rate of AI in diagnosing non-neoplastic lesions, adenomas and invasive cancers were evaluated

    2025-12-31

  • The accuracy and high confidence rate of AI diagnosis of rectosigmoid adenomas ≤5 mm were evaluated

    2025-12-31

  • The influence of lesion location, size and shape on artificial intelligence diagnosis of lesion nature was evaluated.

    2025-12-31

  • The accuracy and high confidence rate of artificial intelligence, endoscopists and endoscopists combined with artificial intelligence in diagnosing lesion nature were compared

    2025-12-31

  • Compare the time it takes for an endoscopist and an AI to make a diagnosis

    2025-12-31

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Interventions

Artificial intelligence assisted diagnostic system was used to diagnose colorectal lesions

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

patients with colorectal lesions

You may qualify if:

  • colorectal lesions

You may not qualify if:

  • lesions lacking high-quality images;
  • Inflammatory bowel disease, familial adenomatous polyposis and other special diseases;
  • submucosal tumors;
  • Pathological diagnosis of Peutz-Jeghers polyps, juvenile polyps, lymphoma and other pathological types.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

First Hospital of Jilin University

Changchun, Jilin, 130021, China

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Artificial Intelligence

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AlgorithmsMathematical Concepts

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE ONLY
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Director, Head of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Center, Principal Investigator, Clinical Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 14, 2025

First Posted

May 21, 2025

Study Start

May 19, 2025

Primary Completion

December 31, 2025

Study Completion

December 31, 2025

Last Updated

August 7, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-08

Locations