NCT06978764

Brief Summary

LIFUP may have a modulatory effect on neuronal circuitry involved in pain, specifically when applied to the anterior thalamic nuclei, which is an important part of the pain circuit .Precise laboratory studies will reveal the indications under which LIFUP produces analgesia. The first step in evaluating LIFUP as a therapy for pain control is to determine whether LIFUP produces analgesia through suppression of the anterior thalamus. The primary objective is to evaluate the short-term analgesic effects of thalamic analgesia caused by LIFUP through:

  1. 1.Quantitative sensory testing (QST) and conditioned pain modulation testing (CPM) that allow the assessment of perceptual responses to quantifiable sensory stimuli, evaluated to characterize somatosensory function or dysfunction.
  2. 2.Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire;
  3. 3.Brief Inventory Form, which includes pain severity index (average of questions 3-6) and pain interference with daily activities (average of questions 9A-9G, ranging from 0 to 70, where 70 indicates maximum possible pain interference);
  4. 4.Douleur Neuropathique-4 to assess neuropathic pain, being positive for scores ≥4;
  5. 5.Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI), which provides characterization of neuropathic pain symptoms in 5 domains (superficial and deep) spontaneous pain, paroxysmal pain, evoked pain and paresthesia.
  6. 6.Hamilton D + A
  7. 7.Medication use (Brief Pain Inventory)
  8. 8.Interference with daily activities (Brief Pain Inventory, quantified by Medication Quantification Scale)
  9. 9.Cognition - Montreal Cognitive Assessment (Mo CA)5 Adverse events
  10. 10.Blinding assessment
  11. 11.Variation in Global Impression of Change (CGI)

Trial Health

55
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
20

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_1

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2024

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 19, 2024

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 10, 2025

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 18, 2025

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2025

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 25, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

May 18, 2025

Status Verified

May 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1.1 years

First QC Date

April 10, 2025

Last Update Submit

May 15, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

plexo braquial

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Pain assessments

    Pain scores in Visual Analog Scale has a numeric scoring that measures the intensity of pain from a scale of 1 to 10. The higher numeric scoring of the scale suggests severity and worse pain sensations. The scale will be analyzed before and after application of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound on the anterior thalamus.

    Before and immediately after intervention. Also 4 hours, 24 hours, 10 days and 28 days after intervention.

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Somatosensory system analysis

    Before intervention as well as immediately after and 28 days after intervention

Other Outcomes (4)

  • Conditioned Pain Modulation

    Before and immediately after intervention and after 28 days after intervention.

  • Neuropathic pain assessment

    Before intervention as well as immediately after and 28 days after intervention

  • Depression and Anxiety analysis

    Before and after 28 days of intervention.

  • +1 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Active

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients receiveing Thalamic LIFUP intervention

Procedure: Thalamic LIFUP

Sham

SHAM COMPARATOR

Patients receiveing Thalamic Sham intervention

Procedure: Thalamic LIFUP

Interventions

Patients will receive intervention in Thalamus region by LIFUP

ActiveSham

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Male or female more than 18 years old;
  • Persistent presence of pain from braquial plexopathy injury for more than 3 months with an average of pain scoring of four or more points in numeric verbal scale (refractory to treatments).

You may not qualify if:

  • history of uncontrolled epilepsy
  • history of depression
  • surgery or hospitalizations in the last 6 months
  • presence of metal brain implants
  • history of alcohol or drug addiction
  • pregnancy
  • history of loss of consciousness lasting more than 15 minutes

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Neurology Department HCFMUSP

São Paulo, São Paulo, 05403000, Brazil

Location

Related Publications (12)

  • Ab Aziz CB, Ahmad AH. The role of the thalamus in modulating pain. Malays J Med Sci. 2006 Jul;13(2):11-8.

    PMID: 22589599BACKGROUND
  • Monna T, Kuroki T, Oka H, Yamamoto S, Murata R, Suyama I, Issiki G, Nakao M. Prevention of vertical transmission of HBV by administration of hepatitis B vaccine combined with HBIG and long-term follow-up of HBsAb titer. Osaka City Med J. 1988 Jul;34(1):9-17. No abstract available.

    PMID: 3419810BACKGROUND
  • Cruccu G, Garcia-Larrea L, Hansson P, Keindl M, Lefaucheur JP, Paulus W, Taylor R, Tronnier V, Truini A, Attal N. EAN guidelines on central neurostimulation therapy in chronic pain conditions. Eur J Neurol. 2016 Oct;23(10):1489-99. doi: 10.1111/ene.13103. Epub 2016 Aug 11.

    PMID: 27511815BACKGROUND
  • Attal N, Ayache SS, Ciampi De Andrade D, Mhalla A, Baudic S, Jazat F, Ahdab R, Neves DO, Sorel M, Lefaucheur JP, Bouhassira D. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct-current stimulation in neuropathic pain due to radiculopathy: a randomized sham-controlled comparative study. Pain. 2016 Jun;157(6):1224-1231. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000510.

    PMID: 26845524BACKGROUND
  • Finnerup NB, Haroutounian S, Kamerman P, Baron R, Bennett DLH, Bouhassira D, Cruccu G, Freeman R, Hansson P, Nurmikko T, Raja SN, Rice ASC, Serra J, Smith BH, Treede RD, Jensen TS. Neuropathic pain: an updated grading system for research and clinical practice. Pain. 2016 Aug;157(8):1599-1606. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000492.

    PMID: 27115670BACKGROUND
  • Peyron R, Laurent B, Garcia-Larrea L. Functional imaging of brain responses to pain. A review and meta-analysis (2000). Neurophysiol Clin. 2000 Oct;30(5):263-88. doi: 10.1016/s0987-7053(00)00227-6.

    PMID: 11126640BACKGROUND
  • de Oliveira RA, de Andrade DC, Machado AG, Teixeira MJ. Central poststroke pain: somatosensory abnormalities and the presence of associated myofascial pain syndrome. BMC Neurol. 2012 Sep 11;12:89. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-12-89.

    PMID: 22966989BACKGROUND
  • Hosomi K, Shimokawa T, Ikoma K, Nakamura Y, Sugiyama K, Ugawa Y, Uozumi T, Yamamoto T, Saitoh Y. Daily repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of primary motor cortex for neuropathic pain: a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, crossover, sham-controlled trial. Pain. 2013 Jul;154(7):1065-72. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.03.016. Epub 2013 Mar 15.

    PMID: 23623156BACKGROUND
  • Kim JS, Bashford G, Murphy KT, Martin A, Dror V, Cheung R. Safety and efficacy of pregabalin in patients with central post-stroke pain. Pain. 2011 May;152(5):1018-1023. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.12.023. Epub 2011 Feb 12.

    PMID: 21316855BACKGROUND
  • Jungehulsing GJ, Israel H, Safar N, Taskin B, Nolte CH, Brunecker P, Wernecke KD, Villringer A. Levetiracetam in patients with central neuropathic post-stroke pain--a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Eur J Neurol. 2013 Feb;20(2):331-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2012.03857.x. Epub 2012 Aug 27.

    PMID: 22925226BACKGROUND
  • Siddall PJ, McClelland JM, Rutkowski SB, Cousins MJ. A longitudinal study of the prevalence and characteristics of pain in the first 5 years following spinal cord injury. Pain. 2003 Jun;103(3):249-257. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(02)00452-9.

    PMID: 12791431BACKGROUND
  • Vartiainen N, Perchet C, Magnin M, Creac'h C, Convers P, Nighoghossian N, Mauguiere F, Peyron R, Garcia-Larrea L. Thalamic pain: anatomical and physiological indices of prediction. Brain. 2016 Mar;139(Pt 3):708-22. doi: 10.1093/brain/awv389. Epub 2016 Feb 8.

    PMID: 26912644BACKGROUND

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 1
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 10, 2025

First Posted

May 18, 2025

Study Start

November 19, 2024

Primary Completion

December 31, 2025

Study Completion

April 25, 2026

Last Updated

May 18, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-05

Locations