NCT06975670

Brief Summary

: Informed consent is an important aspect of research, however in psychiatry research it remains an ethical dilemma, for the lack of clarity on the consent process deters some researchers from mental health research, and yet a good research must ensure that this moral stand is undertaken. Studies that literally test measures that improve the informed consent process in participants with psychotic disorders have been scanty. To date, there is a noticeable absence of an evidence-based intervention for enhancing the comprehension of consent information in research participants with psychotic disorders in the Ugandan context. Thus, this research study is to explore methods like incorporating multimedia components, such as audio and visual aids, to enhance the participants' grasp of research particulars, thereby enabling them to make informed decisions effectively and give informed consent when they are invited to participate in research projects. Objective: To evaluate the comprehension of informed consent, identify key factors that that are associated with comprehension of consent, and determine the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness of audio-visual aids on enhancing the comprehension of consent information during the consenting process in research involving individuals with psychotic disorders. Methods: This will be a multi-method research design that will be achieved through four sub-studies. Sub-study 1 will be cross-sectional and will involve an assessment of comprehension of informed consent using the University of California Brief Assessment of Capacity to Consent (UBACC) tool. Participants will be patients aged 18- 60 years with a psychotic disorder. Sub-study 2 will be a qualitative study that utilizes a user-centered design approach by engaging a multidisciplinary team of stakeholders to develop a multimedia audio-visual consent tool. Sub-study 3 will be a randomized pilot study designed to evaluate the effectiveness of the multimedia video consent tool and how it compares with the traditional paper method in enhancing participants' comprehension of consent information. Sub-study 4 will be a mixed-methods approach using quantitative and qualitative data from exit interviews to assess the Feasibility and Acceptability of the audio-visual consent tool for individuals with psychotic disorders and the research assistants administering the tool in a mental health research setting

Trial Health

35
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2025

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 9, 2025

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 16, 2025

Completed
14 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 30, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 30, 2025

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 30, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

May 23, 2025

Status Verified

May 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

May 9, 2025

Last Update Submit

May 20, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Enhanced comprehension of consent information

    Shall use the measure of the scores for the UBACC tool

    1 week

Study Arms (2)

Intervention arm

OTHER

The 30 participants assigned to the multimedia consent, which is the intervention arm, will first meet individually with a trained research assistant who will provide a video that explains the protocol and encourage them to watch it. Subjects will be encouraged to have the RA stop the multimedia consent video and repeat any segments that are unclear. Participants will also be encouraged to discuss and clarify issues with the RAs (and not simply have the video rerun). Having such a discussion is vital in that, much as multimedia consent aids appear to be more effective as aids, they should not be viewed as substitutes for person-to-person interaction(Flory \& Emanuel, 2004). In order to control for social element consent enhancement, the role of the RA will be emphasized that he or she is meant to guide the participant, not educating them. The RA will record duration of time the consent will takes for each participant, so that we compare time spent in each consent condition.

Other: multimedia consent tool

control arm

NO INTERVENTION

The 30 participants assigned to the routine paper consent procedure which is the control arm, will first meet individually with a trained research assistant who will provide the subjects with the printed consent form and encourage them to read along while the research assistant (RA) read it aloud. Participants will be motivated to stop the RA and seek for clarification any time during the consent process. To control for social element consent enhancement, the role of the RA will be emphasized that he or she is meant to guide the participant, not educating them. The RA will record duration of time the consent will take for each participant, so that we compare time spent in each consent condition

Interventions

The multimedia consent tool is new and developed for this particular study

Intervention arm

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Psychotic disorders who score below 14.5 on UBACC trials.
  • years

You may not qualify if:

  • Those participants that do not speak English or Luganda will be excluded from the study
  • Hearing or Visual impairments

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Psychotic Disorders

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic DisordersMental Disorders

Study Officials

  • Ponsiano Ochama, PhD

    Makerere University

    STUDY CHAIR

Central Study Contacts

Justine D Namuli, MMED PSYCHIATRY

CONTACT

Harriet N Nambooze, social works(SWASA)

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
They will not know the arm that the patient belonged to during asssesment
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: To randomize participants into two consent arms. The control arm are those who will be given routine traditional paper consent, then the intervention arm, those who will be given a multimedia consent tool and assess if their is improvement in comprehension
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 9, 2025

First Posted

May 16, 2025

Study Start

May 30, 2025

Primary Completion

July 30, 2025

Study Completion

August 30, 2025

Last Updated

May 23, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Data will be deposited in the repository,

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
Time Frame
As advised