Enhancing Comprehension of Consent in Patients With Psychotic Disorders
UBACC
ENHANCING COMPREHENSION OF INFORMED CONSENT IN RESEARCH INVOLVING PATIENTS WITH PSYCHOTIC DISORDERS USING AUDIO-VISUAL AIDS
2 other identifiers
interventional
60
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
: Informed consent is an important aspect of research, however in psychiatry research it remains an ethical dilemma, for the lack of clarity on the consent process deters some researchers from mental health research, and yet a good research must ensure that this moral stand is undertaken. Studies that literally test measures that improve the informed consent process in participants with psychotic disorders have been scanty. To date, there is a noticeable absence of an evidence-based intervention for enhancing the comprehension of consent information in research participants with psychotic disorders in the Ugandan context. Thus, this research study is to explore methods like incorporating multimedia components, such as audio and visual aids, to enhance the participants' grasp of research particulars, thereby enabling them to make informed decisions effectively and give informed consent when they are invited to participate in research projects. Objective: To evaluate the comprehension of informed consent, identify key factors that that are associated with comprehension of consent, and determine the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness of audio-visual aids on enhancing the comprehension of consent information during the consenting process in research involving individuals with psychotic disorders. Methods: This will be a multi-method research design that will be achieved through four sub-studies. Sub-study 1 will be cross-sectional and will involve an assessment of comprehension of informed consent using the University of California Brief Assessment of Capacity to Consent (UBACC) tool. Participants will be patients aged 18- 60 years with a psychotic disorder. Sub-study 2 will be a qualitative study that utilizes a user-centered design approach by engaging a multidisciplinary team of stakeholders to develop a multimedia audio-visual consent tool. Sub-study 3 will be a randomized pilot study designed to evaluate the effectiveness of the multimedia video consent tool and how it compares with the traditional paper method in enhancing participants' comprehension of consent information. Sub-study 4 will be a mixed-methods approach using quantitative and qualitative data from exit interviews to assess the Feasibility and Acceptability of the audio-visual consent tool for individuals with psychotic disorders and the research assistants administering the tool in a mental health research setting
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started May 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 9, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 16, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 30, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 30, 2025
CompletedMay 23, 2025
May 1, 2025
2 months
May 9, 2025
May 20, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Enhanced comprehension of consent information
Shall use the measure of the scores for the UBACC tool
1 week
Study Arms (2)
Intervention arm
OTHERThe 30 participants assigned to the multimedia consent, which is the intervention arm, will first meet individually with a trained research assistant who will provide a video that explains the protocol and encourage them to watch it. Subjects will be encouraged to have the RA stop the multimedia consent video and repeat any segments that are unclear. Participants will also be encouraged to discuss and clarify issues with the RAs (and not simply have the video rerun). Having such a discussion is vital in that, much as multimedia consent aids appear to be more effective as aids, they should not be viewed as substitutes for person-to-person interaction(Flory \& Emanuel, 2004). In order to control for social element consent enhancement, the role of the RA will be emphasized that he or she is meant to guide the participant, not educating them. The RA will record duration of time the consent will takes for each participant, so that we compare time spent in each consent condition.
control arm
NO INTERVENTIONThe 30 participants assigned to the routine paper consent procedure which is the control arm, will first meet individually with a trained research assistant who will provide the subjects with the printed consent form and encourage them to read along while the research assistant (RA) read it aloud. Participants will be motivated to stop the RA and seek for clarification any time during the consent process. To control for social element consent enhancement, the role of the RA will be emphasized that he or she is meant to guide the participant, not educating them. The RA will record duration of time the consent will take for each participant, so that we compare time spent in each consent condition
Interventions
The multimedia consent tool is new and developed for this particular study
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Psychotic disorders who score below 14.5 on UBACC trials.
- years
You may not qualify if:
- Those participants that do not speak English or Luganda will be excluded from the study
- Hearing or Visual impairments
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Ponsiano Ochama, PhD
Makerere University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- They will not know the arm that the patient belonged to during asssesment
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 9, 2025
First Posted
May 16, 2025
Study Start
May 30, 2025
Primary Completion
July 30, 2025
Study Completion
August 30, 2025
Last Updated
May 23, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
- Time Frame
- As advised
Data will be deposited in the repository,