Capsular Tension Ring With Hydeophilic Intraocular Lesnes to Decrease Posterior Capsule Opacification Versus Hydrophobic Ones
Assessment of the Outcomes of Routine Insertion of Capsular Tension Ring (CTR) With Hydrophilic Versus Hydrophobic Intraocular Lenses (IOLs) Alone After Phacoemulsification
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
evaluate the clinical outcomes of routine CTR insertion in conjunction with hydrophilic versus hydrophobic IOLs following phacoemulsification.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 8, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 8, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 16, 2025
CompletedMay 16, 2025
May 1, 2025
7 months
May 8, 2025
May 8, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change in BCVA (LogMAR)
The formula: logMAR score (0.1 NL + 0.02 nl) where NL = number of lines completely read and nl = number of additional letters read ap- plies. For this method, the higher the logMAR VA score, the better the visual acuity.
at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively.
Refractive error measurements (spherical equivalent)
SE was calculated as the spherical power of the refractive error plus one-half of the cylinder power. Hyperopia was defined as a spherical equivalent (SE) values of ≥ + 1.00 diopter (D) and emmetropia as a SE ranging between 0.99 and - 0.49 D. Myopia was defined as a SE refraction of ≤ -0.50 D.
at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively.
Study Arms (2)
Group A: CTR + Hydrophilic IOL
ACTIVE COMPARATORphacoemulsification and insertion of CTR the hydrophilic IOL
Group B: Hydrophobic IOL alone
ACTIVE COMPARATORphacoemulsification and insertiion of hydrophobic IOL
Interventions
cataract extracton with phacoemulsification
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults aged 40-80 years.
- Visually significant cataract (≥3+ on Lens Opacities Classification System III "LOCSIII").
- Clear cornea.
You may not qualify if:
- Previous ocular surgery.
- Zonular instability requiring CTR insertion beyond routine practice.
- Complicated cataract cases (e.g., traumatic cataract).
- Active intraocular inflammation or infection.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Benha Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Al-Azhar Faculty of Medicine
Cairo, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Lecturer
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 8, 2025
First Posted
May 16, 2025
Study Start
February 8, 2024
Primary Completion
September 1, 2024
Study Completion
September 1, 2024
Last Updated
May 16, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-05